These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

163 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33116382)

  • 1. A Review on Different Tonometers for Intraocular Pressure Measurement After Photorefractive Keratectomy or Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.
    Chow SC; Yeung BYM
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2020; 14():3305-3323. PubMed ID: 33116382
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Changes in intraocular pressure values measured with noncontact tonometer (NCT), ocular response analyzer (ORA) and corvis scheimpflug technology tonometer (CST) in the early phase after small incision lenticule extraction (SMILE).
    Shen Y; Su X; Liu X; Miao H; Fang X; Zhou X
    BMC Ophthalmol; 2016 Nov; 16(1):205. PubMed ID: 27863469
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical evaluation of a new correction algorithm for dynamic Scheimpflug analyzer tonometry before and after laser in situ keratomileusis and small-incision lenticule extraction.
    Chen KJ; Joda A; Vinciguerra R; Eliasy A; Sefat SMM; Kook D; Geraghty B; Roberts CJ; Elsheikh A
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 May; 44(5):581-588. PubMed ID: 29685776
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Intraocular pressure and photorefractive keratectomy: a comparison of three different tonometers.
    Garzozi HJ; Chung HS; Lang Y; Kagemann L; Harris A
    Cornea; 2001 Jan; 20(1):33-6. PubMed ID: 11189000
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Comparison of Changes in Corneal Biomechanical Properties after Photorefractive Keratectomy and Small Incision Lenticule Extraction.
    Yıldırım Y; Ölçücü O; Başcı A; Ağca A; Özgürhan EB; Alagöz C; Demircan A; Demirok A
    Turk J Ophthalmol; 2016 Apr; 46(2):47-51. PubMed ID: 27800259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Goldmann applanation tonometer versus ocular response analyzer for measuring intraocular pressure after congenital cataract surgery.
    Feizi S; Faramarzi A; Kheiri B
    Eur J Ophthalmol; 2018 Sep; 28(5):582-589. PubMed ID: 30246567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Comparing corneal higher-order aberrations in corneal wavefront-guided transepithelial photorefractive keratectomy versus small-incision lenticule extraction.
    Lee H; Yong Kang DS; Reinstein DZ; Arba-Mosquera S; Kim EK; Seo KY; Kim TI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2018 Jun; 44(6):725-733. PubMed ID: 29789156
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The effect of excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy on intraocular pressure measurements using the Goldmann applanation tonometer.
    Mardelli PG; Piebenga LW; Whitacre MM; Siegmund KD
    Ophthalmology; 1997 Jun; 104(6):945-8; discussion 949. PubMed ID: 9186434
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Corneal epithelial alterations resulting from use of chlorine-disinfected contact tonometer after myopic photorefractive keratectomy.
    Maldonado MJ
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Aug; 105(8):1546-9. PubMed ID: 9709772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comparison of Goldmann applanation tonometry and dynamic contour tonometry in the measurement of intraocular pressure in eyes with different corneal thicknesses.
    Roszkowska AM; De Grazia L; Cirone M; Ferreri G
    Ophthalmologica; 2009; 223(4):244-9. PubMed ID: 19321977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Comparison of corneal biomechanical changes after refractive surgery by noncontact tonometry: small-incision lenticule extraction versus flap-based refractive surgery - a systematic review.
    Raevdal P; Grauslund J; Vestergaard AH
    Acta Ophthalmol; 2019 Mar; 97(2):127-136. PubMed ID: 30203530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of intraocular pressure measurement between rebound, non-contact and Goldmann applanation tonometry in treated glaucoma patients.
    Vincent SJ; Vincent RA; Shields D; Lee GA
    Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2012; 40(4):e163-70. PubMed ID: 21883774
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Evaluation of Changes in Human Corneas After Femtosecond Laser-Assisted LASIK and Small-Incision Lenticule Extraction (SMILE) Using Non-Contact Tonometry and Ultra-High-Speed Camera (Corvis ST).
    Sefat SM; Wiltfang R; Bechmann M; Mayer WJ; Kampik A; Kook D
    Curr Eye Res; 2016 Jul; 41(7):917-22. PubMed ID: 26554611
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Comparison of different intraocular pressure measurement techniques in normal eyes and post small incision lenticule extraction.
    Hosny M; Aboalazayem F; El Shiwy H; Salem M
    Clin Ophthalmol; 2017; 11():1309-1314. PubMed ID: 28761329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Corneal biomechanical properties: precision and influence on tonometry.
    Ogbuehi KC; Osuagwu UL
    Cont Lens Anterior Eye; 2014 Jun; 37(3):124-31. PubMed ID: 24121009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. A cross-sectional study to compare intraocular pressure measurement by sequential use of Goldman applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, ocular response analyzer, and Corvis ST.
    Tejwani S; Dinakaran S; Joshi A; Shetty R; Sinha Roy A
    Indian J Ophthalmol; 2015 Nov; 63(11):815-20. PubMed ID: 26669331
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [How does central cornea thickness influence intraocular pressure during applanation and contour tonometry?].
    Schwenteck T; Knappe M; Moros I
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 2012 Sep; 229(9):917-27. PubMed ID: 22972357
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Influence of corneal parameters in keratoconus on IOP readings obtained with different tonometers.
    Firat PG; Orman G; Doganay S; Demirel S
    Clin Exp Optom; 2013 Mar; 96(2):233-7. PubMed ID: 23320621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of intraocular pressures after myopic laser-assisted subepithelial keratectomy: tonometry-pachymetry, Goldmann applanation tonometry, dynamic contour tonometry, and noncontact tonometry.
    Han KE; Kim H; Kim NR; Jun I; Kim EK; Kim TI
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 2013 Jun; 39(6):888-97. PubMed ID: 23688875
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tono-Pen versus Goldmann tonometry after excimer laser photorefractive keratectomy.
    Levy Y; Zadok D; Glovinsky Y; Krakowski D; Nemet P
    J Cataract Refract Surg; 1999 Apr; 25(4):486-91. PubMed ID: 10198852
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.