These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

58 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 331174)

  • 1. A double running suture technique for keratoplasty: earlier visual rehabilitation.
    McNeill JI; Kaufman HE
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1977 Aug; 8(4):58-61. PubMed ID: 331174
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. A comparison of two selective interrupted suture removal techniques for control of post keratoplasty astigmatism.
    Forster RK
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 1997; 95():193-214; discussion 214-20. PubMed ID: 9440170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Shortterm and longterm visual and astigmatic results of an opposing 10-0 nylon double running suture technique for penetrating keratoplasty.
    Dolorico AM; Tayyani R; Ong HV; Gaster RN
    J Am Coll Surg; 2003 Dec; 197(6):991-9. PubMed ID: 14644288
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Keratometric results of penetrating keratoplasty with the Hessburg-Barron and Hanna trephine systems using a standard double-running suture technique.
    Wiffen SJ; Maguire LJ; Bourne WM
    Cornea; 1997 May; 16(3):306-13. PubMed ID: 9143803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Results of a double running suture in penetrating keratoplasty performed on keratoconus patients.
    Young SR; Olson RJ
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1985 Dec; 16(12):779-86. PubMed ID: 3911128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Keratometric results during the first year after keratoplasty: adjustable single running suture technique versus double running suture technique.
    Ramirez M; Hodge DO; Bourne WM
    Ophthalmic Surg Lasers; 2001; 32(5):370-4. PubMed ID: 11563780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Suture technique for perforating keratoplasty (author's transl)].
    Hoffmann F
    Klin Monbl Augenheilkd; 1976 Nov; 169(5):584-90. PubMed ID: 794567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Visual loss following suture removal postkeratoplasty.
    Spigelman AV; Doughman DJ; Lindstrom RL; Nelson JD
    Cornea; 1988; 7(3):214-7. PubMed ID: 3048884
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Changes in corneal power and refraction due to sequential suture removal following nonmechanical penetrating keratoplasty in eyes with keratoconus.
    Langenbucher A; Seitz B
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2006 Feb; 141(2):287-293. PubMed ID: 16458682
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Suturing technique for control of postkeratoplasty astigmatism and myopia.
    Dursun D; Forster RK; Feuer WJ
    Trans Am Ophthalmol Soc; 2002; 100():51-7; discussion 57-9. PubMed ID: 12545677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Repeat keratoplasty for correction of high or irregular postkeratoplasty astigmatism in clear corneal grafts.
    Szentmáry N; Seitz B; Langenbucher A; Naumann GO
    Am J Ophthalmol; 2005 May; 139(5):826-30. PubMed ID: 15860287
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Timing of suture removal in sequential surgery: a pilot study.
    Tejedor J; Pérez-Rodríguez JA
    Cornea; 2009 Sep; 28(8):860-4. PubMed ID: 19654532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Results of penetrating keratoplasty using a double running suture technique.
    Davison JA; Bourne WM
    Arch Ophthalmol; 1981 Sep; 99(9):1591-5. PubMed ID: 7025812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Early visual rehabilitation after keratoplasty: a double running suture technique.
    McNeill JI; Kaufman HE
    Ann Ophthalmol; 1978 Apr; 10(5):652-5. PubMed ID: 354463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of the effect of three suturing techniques on postkeratoplasty astigmatism in keratoconus.
    Javadi MA; Naderi M; Zare M; Jenaban A; Rabei HM; Anissian A
    Cornea; 2006 Oct; 25(9):1029-33. PubMed ID: 17133048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Combined interrupted and continuous versus single continuous adjustable suturing in penetrating keratoplasty: a prospective, randomized study of induced astigmatism during the first postoperative year.
    Karabatsas CH; Cook SD; Figueiredo FC; Diamond JP; Easty DL
    Ophthalmology; 1998 Nov; 105(11):1991-8. PubMed ID: 9818595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Current techniques for improved visual results after penetrating keratoplasty.
    Bourne WM
    Ophthalmic Surg; 1981 May; 12(5):321-7. PubMed ID: 7022297
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Topographic changes that occur with 10-0 running suture removal following penetrating keratoplasty.
    Lin DT; Wilson SE; Reidy JJ; Klyce SD; McDonald MB; Insler MS; Kaufman HE
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1990; 6(1):21-5. PubMed ID: 2248900
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Complications of Mersilene sutures in penetrating keratoplasty.
    Bertram BA; Drews-Botsch C; Gemmill M; Guell J; Murad M; Waring GO
    Refract Corneal Surg; 1992; 8(4):296-305. PubMed ID: 1390410
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Spontaneous wound dehiscence after removal of single continuous penetrating keratoplasty suture: conservative management.
    Ugarte M; Falcon MG
    Cornea; 2006 Dec; 25(10):1260-1. PubMed ID: 17172915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 3.