These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

607 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33119106)

  • 1. Cost-effectiveness of Population-Wide Genomic Screening for Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer in the United States.
    Guzauskas GF; Garbett S; Zhou Z; Spencer SJ; Smith HS; Hao J; Hassen D; Snyder SR; Graves JA; Peterson JF; Williams MS; Veenstra DL
    JAMA Netw Open; 2020 Oct; 3(10):e2022874. PubMed ID: 33119106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Cost-effectiveness of population screening for BRCA mutations in Ashkenazi jewish women compared with family history-based testing.
    Manchanda R; Legood R; Burnell M; McGuire A; Raikou M; Loggenberg K; Wardle J; Sanderson S; Gessler S; Side L; Balogun N; Desai R; Kumar A; Dorkins H; Wallis Y; Chapman C; Taylor R; Jacobs C; Tomlinson I; Beller U; Menon U; Jacobs I
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Jan; 107(1):380. PubMed ID: 25435542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Cost-Effectiveness of Gene-Specific Prevention Strategies for Ovarian and Breast Cancer.
    Wei X; Sun L; Slade E; Fierheller CT; Oxley S; Kalra A; Sia J; Sideris M; McCluggage WG; Bromham N; Dworzynski K; Rosenthal AN; Brentnall A; Duffy S; Evans DG; Yang L; Legood R; Manchanda R
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Feb; 7(2):e2355324. PubMed ID: 38334999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Cost-effectiveness of Population-Based BRCA1, BRCA2, RAD51C, RAD51D, BRIP1, PALB2 Mutation Testing in Unselected General Population Women.
    Manchanda R; Patel S; Gordeev VS; Antoniou AC; Smith S; Lee A; Hopper JL; MacInnis RJ; Turnbull C; Ramus SJ; Gayther SA; Pharoah PDP; Menon U; Jacobs I; Legood R
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2018 Jul; 110(7):714-725. PubMed ID: 29361001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Cost-Effectiveness of Population-Based Multigene Testing for Breast and Ovarian Cancer Prevention.
    Guo F; Adekanmbi V; Hsu CD; Berenson AB; Kuo YF; Shih YT
    JAMA Netw Open; 2024 Feb; 7(2):e2356078. PubMed ID: 38353949
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Specifying the ovarian cancer risk threshold of 'premenopausal risk-reducing salpingo-oophorectomy' for ovarian cancer prevention: a cost-effectiveness analysis.
    Manchanda R; Legood R; Antoniou AC; Gordeev VS; Menon U
    J Med Genet; 2016 Sep; 53(9):591-9. PubMed ID: 27354448
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Population Genomic Screening for Three Common Hereditary Conditions : A Cost-Effectiveness Analysis.
    Guzauskas GF; Garbett S; Zhou Z; Schildcrout JS; Graves JA; Williams MS; Hao J; Jones LK; Spencer SJ; Jiang S; Veenstra DL; Peterson JF
    Ann Intern Med; 2023 May; 176(5):585-595. PubMed ID: 37155986
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Economic modeling of risk-adapted screen-and-treat strategies in women at high risk for breast or ovarian cancer.
    Müller D; Danner M; Schmutzler R; Engel C; Wassermann K; Stollenwerk B; Stock S; Rhiem K
    Eur J Health Econ; 2019 Jul; 20(5):739-750. PubMed ID: 30790097
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cost-effectiveness of population-wide genomic screening for familial hypercholesterolemia in the United States.
    Spencer SJ; Jones LK; Guzauskas GF; Hao J; Williams MS; Peterson JF; Veenstra DL
    J Clin Lipidol; 2022; 16(5):667-675. PubMed ID: 35961838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Economic Modelling of Screen-and-Treat Strategies for Brazilian Women at Risk of Hereditary Breast and Ovarian Cancer.
    Simoes Correa-Galendi J; Del Pilar Estevez Diz M; Stock S; Müller D
    Appl Health Econ Health Policy; 2021 Jan; 19(1):97-109. PubMed ID: 32537695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A Cost-effectiveness Analysis of Multigene Testing for All Patients With Breast Cancer.
    Sun L; Brentnall A; Patel S; Buist DSM; Bowles EJA; Evans DGR; Eccles D; Hopper J; Li S; Southey M; Duffy S; Cuzick J; Dos Santos Silva I; Miners A; Sadique Z; Yang L; Legood R; Manchanda R
    JAMA Oncol; 2019 Dec; 5(12):1718-1730. PubMed ID: 31580391
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Estimating Cost-effectiveness of a Multimodal Ovarian Cancer Screening Program in the United States: Secondary Analysis of the UK Collaborative Trial of Ovarian Cancer Screening (UKCTOCS).
    Moss HA; Berchuck A; Neely ML; Myers ER; Havrilesky LJ
    JAMA Oncol; 2018 Feb; 4(2):190-195. PubMed ID: 29222541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cost-effectiveness of population-wide genomic screening for Lynch syndrome in the United States.
    Guzauskas GF; Jiang S; Garbett S; Zhou Z; Spencer SJ; Snyder SR; Graves JA; Williams MS; Hao J; Peterson JF; Veenstra DL
    Genet Med; 2022 May; 24(5):1017-1026. PubMed ID: 35227606
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Cost-Effectiveness of Unselected Multigene Germline and Somatic Genetic Testing for Epithelial Ovarian Cancer.
    Manchanda R; Sun L; Sobocan M; Rodriguez IV; Wei X; Kalra A; Oxley S; Sideris M; Fierheller CT; Morgan RD; Chandrasekaran D; Rust K; Spiliopoulou P; Miller RE; Crusz SM; Lockley M; Singh N; Faruqi A; Casey L; Brockbank E; Phadnis S; Mills-Baldock T; El-Khouly F; Jenkins LA; Wallace A; Ahmed M; Kumar A; Swisher EM; Gourley C; Norquist BM; Evans DG; Legood R
    J Natl Compr Canc Netw; 2024 Apr; 22(2D):. PubMed ID: 38866043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Defining the risk threshold for risk reducing salpingo-oophorectomy for ovarian cancer prevention in low risk postmenopausal women.
    Manchanda R; Legood R; Pearce L; Menon U
    Gynecol Oncol; 2015 Dec; 139(3):487-94. PubMed ID: 26436478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Cost-effectiveness of Breast Cancer Screening With Magnetic Resonance Imaging for Women at Familial Risk.
    Geuzinge HA; Obdeijn IM; Rutgers EJT; Saadatmand S; Mann RM; Oosterwijk JC; Tollenaar RAEM; de Roy van Zuidewijn DBW; Lobbes MBI; van 't Riet M; Hooning MJ; Ausems MGEM; Loo CE; Wesseling J; Luiten EJT; Zonderland HM; Verhoef C; Heijnsdijk EAM; Tilanus-Linthorst MMA; de Koning HJ;
    JAMA Oncol; 2020 Sep; 6(9):1381-1389. PubMed ID: 32729887
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrospective cost-effectiveness analysis of screening mammography.
    Stout NK; Rosenberg MA; Trentham-Dietz A; Smith MA; Robinson SM; Fryback DG
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2006 Jun; 98(11):774-82. PubMed ID: 16757702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Cost effectiveness of the NHS breast screening programme: life table model.
    Pharoah PD; Sewell B; Fitzsimmons D; Bennett HS; Pashayan N
    BMJ; 2013 May; 346():f2618. PubMed ID: 23661112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Cost-effectiveness of MRI compared to mammography for breast cancer screening in a high risk population.
    Moore SG; Shenoy PJ; Fanucchi L; Tumeh JW; Flowers CR
    BMC Health Serv Res; 2009 Jan; 9():9. PubMed ID: 19144138
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 31.