These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

87 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33119181)

  • 21. The Dutch public are positive about the colorectal cancer-screening programme, but is this a well-informed opinion?
    Douma LN; Uiters E; Timmermans DR
    BMC Public Health; 2016 Nov; 16(1):1208. PubMed ID: 27899154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. The Effect of a Health Education Intervention on Jordanian Participants' Colorectal Cancer Knowledge, Health Perceptions, and Screening Practices.
    Abuadas FH; Petro-Nustas WJ; Abuadas MH
    Cancer Nurs; 2018; 41(3):226-237. PubMed ID: 28252461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. The case for philanthropic investment to increase colorectal cancer screening rates: A novel paradigm to address a public health challenge.
    Carmeli A; Dranikoff L; Kundu A; Ladabaum U
    Cancer Med; 2020 Feb; 9(3):1220-1229. PubMed ID: 31808317
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Understanding the impact of colorectal cancer education: a randomized trial of health fairs.
    Briant KJ; Wang L; Holte S; Ramos A; Marchello N; Thompson B
    BMC Public Health; 2015 Nov; 15():1196. PubMed ID: 26621127
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. How many "Get Screened" messages does it take? Evidence from colorectal cancer screening promotion in the United States, 2012.
    Cooper CP; Gelb CA; Hawkins NA
    Prev Med; 2014 Mar; 60():27-32. PubMed ID: 24333876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Koreans’ Awareness and Preventive Behaviors Regarding Colorectal Cancer Screening.
    Lee SY
    Asian Pac J Cancer Prev; 2018 Sep; 19(9):2657-2664. PubMed ID: 30256565
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Impact of Tailored Interventions on Receipt of a Preference-Concordant Colorectal Cancer Screening Test.
    Christy SM; Monahan PO; Stump TE; Rawl SM; Champion VL
    Med Decis Making; 2020 Jan; 40(1):29-41. PubMed ID: 31814511
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The impact of personalised risk information compared to a positive/negative result on informed choice and intention to undergo colonoscopy following colorectal Cancer screening in Scotland (PERICCS) - a randomised controlled trial: study protocol.
    Steele RJC; Digby J; Chambers JA; O'Carroll RE
    BMC Public Health; 2019 Apr; 19(1):411. PubMed ID: 30991987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Providers' knowledge, attitudes, and practices related to colorectal cancer control in Brazil.
    Perin DM; Saraiya M; Thompson TD; de Moura L; Simoes EJ; Parra DC; Brownson RC
    Prev Med; 2015 Dec; 81():373-9. PubMed ID: 26441300
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Knowledge and practice of colorectal screening in a suburban group of Iraqi American women.
    Jillson I; Faeq Z; Kabbara KW; Cousin C; Mumford W; Blancato J
    J Cancer Educ; 2015 Jun; 30(2):284-93. PubMed ID: 25787223
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Failure of Colonoscopy Knowledge to Predict Colonoscopy Uptake.
    Basch CH; Basch CE; Zybert P; Wolf RL
    J Community Health; 2016 Oct; 41(5):1094-9. PubMed ID: 27098522
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Factors affecting patient adherence to publicly funded colorectal cancer screening programmes: a systematic review.
    Dressler J; Johnsen AT; Madsen LJ; Rasmussen M; Jorgensen LN
    Public Health; 2021 Jan; 190():67-74. PubMed ID: 33360029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Storytelling for promoting colorectal cancer screening among underserved Latina women: a randomized pilot study.
    Larkey LK; Lopez AM; Minnal A; Gonzalez J
    Cancer Control; 2009 Jan; 16(1):79-87. PubMed ID: 19078934
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Knowledge, attitudes, and behavioral intentions in relation to the early detection of colorectal cancer in the United Kingdom.
    McCaffery K; Wardle J; Waller J
    Prev Med; 2003 May; 36(5):525-35. PubMed ID: 12689797
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Why do some participants in colorectal cancer screening choose not to undergo colonoscopy following a positive test result? A qualitative study.
    Bie AKL; Brodersen J
    Scand J Prim Health Care; 2018 Sep; 36(3):262-271. PubMed ID: 30238859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Do people with a different goal-orientation or specific focus make different decisions about colorectal cancer-screening participation?
    Douma LN; Uiters E; Timmermans DRM
    PLoS One; 2019; 14(2):e0213003. PubMed ID: 30817788
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Contrasts in Practices and Perceived Barriers to Colorectal Cancer Screening by Nurses and Physicians Working in Primary Care Settings in Oman.
    Muliira JK; D'Souza MS; Ahmed SM
    J Cancer Educ; 2016 Mar; 31(1):15-25. PubMed ID: 25739678
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Endoscopic non-technical skills team training: the next step in quality assurance of endoscopy training.
    Matharoo M; Haycock A; Sevdalis N; Thomas-Gibson S
    World J Gastroenterol; 2014 Dec; 20(46):17507-15. PubMed ID: 25516665
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Gender differences in colorectal cancer screening barriers and information needs.
    Friedemann-Sánchez G; Griffin JM; Partin MR
    Health Expect; 2007 Jun; 10(2):148-60. PubMed ID: 17524008
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Feasibility Study to Assess the Impact of a Lifestyle Intervention during Colorectal Cancer Screening in France.
    Huybrechts I; Kliemann N; Perol O; Cattey-Javouhey A; Benech N; Maire A; Lignini T; Carretier J; Saurin JC; Fervers B; Gunter MJ
    Nutrients; 2021 Oct; 13(11):. PubMed ID: 34835941
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.