These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
131 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33119340)
1. Assessing feigning with the Feigning Evaluation INtegrating Sources (FEINS) in a forensic psychiatric sample. Grossi LM; Green D; Cabeldue M; Pivovarova E Psychol Serv; 2022 May; 19(2):213-224. PubMed ID: 33119340 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The Relationship Between Psychiatric and Cognitive Symptom Feigning Among Forensic Inpatients Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial. Gottfried E; Glassmire D Assessment; 2016 Dec; 23(6):672-682. PubMed ID: 26253572 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. The association between clinicians' initial judgments of feigning and outcomes on symptom validity measures among pretrial forensic psychiatric inpatients. Ng W; Mattos LA; Coffey CA; Molina SM; Gottfried ED; Glassmire DM Int J Law Psychiatry; 2021; 76():101698. PubMed ID: 33819780 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Evaluation of the Response Bias Scale and Improbable Failure Scale in assessing feigned cognitive impairment. Grossi LM; Green D; Einzig S; Belfi B Psychol Assess; 2017 May; 29(5):531-541. PubMed ID: 27504905 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Improving the Detection of Feigned Knowledge Deficits in Defendants Adjudicated Incompetent to Stand Trial. Gottfried ED; Hudson BL; Vitacco MJ; Carbonell JL Assessment; 2017 Mar; 24(2):232-243. PubMed ID: 26423350 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Likelihood of obtaining Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 elevations among forensic psychiatric inpatients with screening elevations on the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test. Glassmire DM; Tarescavage AM; Gottfried ED Psychol Assess; 2016 Dec; 28(12):1586-1596. PubMed ID: 27046275 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. An investigation of the ECST-R in male pretrial patients: evaluating the effects of feigning on competency evaluations. Vitacco MJ; Rogers R; Gabel J Assessment; 2009 Sep; 16(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 19779096 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Differences between Structured Interview of Reported Symptoms (SIRS) and SIRS-2 sensitivity estimates among forensic inpatients: A criterion groups comparison. Tarescavage AM; Glassmire DM Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):488-502. PubMed ID: 27077677 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Convergent validity of a screening measure designed to identify defendants feigning knowledge deficits related to competence to stand trial. Otto RK; Musick JE; Sherrod C Assessment; 2011 Mar; 18(1):60-2. PubMed ID: 20634419 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. A validation of the test of memory malingering in a forensic psychiatric setting. Weinborn M; Orr T; Woods SP; Conover E; Feix J J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2003 Oct; 25(7):979-90. PubMed ID: 13680444 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Screening for feigning in a civil forensic setting. Alwes YR; Clark JA; Berry DT; Granacher RP J Clin Exp Neuropsychol; 2008 Feb; 30(2):133-40. PubMed ID: 18938665 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Overlooking Feigning Behavior May Result in Potential Harmful Treatment Interventions: Two Case Reports of Undetected Malingering. van der Heide D; Boskovic I; van Harten P; Merckelbach H J Forensic Sci; 2020 Jul; 65(4):1371-1375. PubMed ID: 32202670 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Screening for feigned psychiatric symptoms in a forensic sample by using the MMPI-2 and the structured inventory of malingered symptomatology. Lewis JL; Simcox AM; Berry DT Psychol Assess; 2002 Jun; 14(2):170-6. PubMed ID: 12056079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Cross-cultural feigning assessment: A systematic review of feigning instruments used with linguistically, ethnically, and culturally diverse samples. Nijdam-Jones A; Rosenfeld B Psychol Assess; 2017 Nov; 29(11):1321-1336. PubMed ID: 28080105 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Detecting feigned traumatic brain injury with eye tracking during a test of performance validity. Kanser RJ; Bashem JR; Patrick SD; Hanks RA; Rapport LJ Neuropsychology; 2020 Mar; 34(3):308-320. PubMed ID: 31944789 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Clinical and conceptual problems in the attribution of malingering in forensic evaluations. Drob SL; Meehan KB; Waxman SE J Am Acad Psychiatry Law; 2009; 37(1):98-106. PubMed ID: 19297641 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Identifying persons feigning limitations in their competence to proceed in the legal process. Guenther CC; Otto RK Behav Sci Law; 2010; 28(5):603-13. PubMed ID: 20842642 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Forensic applications of the Miller Forensic Assessment of Symptoms Test (MFAST): screening for feigned disorders in competency to stand trial evaluations. Jackson RL; Rogers R; Sewell KW Law Hum Behav; 2005 Apr; 29(2):199-210. PubMed ID: 15912724 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The detection of feigning using multiple PAI scale elevations: a new index. Gaines MV; Giles CL; Morgan RD Assessment; 2013 Aug; 20(4):437-47. PubMed ID: 22946102 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]