These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Why are lineups better than showups? A test of the filler siphoning and enhanced discriminability accounts. Colloff MF; Wixted JT J Exp Psychol Appl; 2020 Mar; 26(1):124-143. PubMed ID: 30883151 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Lineup composition, suspect position, and the sequential lineup advantage. Carlson CA; Gronlund SD; Clark SE J Exp Psychol Appl; 2008 Jun; 14(2):118-128. PubMed ID: 18590368 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Double-blind photo lineups using actual eyewitnesses: an experimental test of a sequential versus simultaneous lineup procedure. Wells GL; Steblay NK; Dysart JE Law Hum Behav; 2015 Feb; 39(1):1-14. PubMed ID: 24933175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. New signal detection theory-based framework for eyewitness performance in lineups. Lee J; Penrod SD Law Hum Behav; 2019 Oct; 43(5):436-454. PubMed ID: 31368723 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The impact of eyewitness identifications from simultaneous and sequential lineups. Wright DB Memory; 2007 Oct; 15(7):746-54. PubMed ID: 17852725 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Blind sequential lineup administration reduces both false identifications and confidence in those false identifications. Charman SD; Quiroz V Law Hum Behav; 2016 Oct; 40(5):477-87. PubMed ID: 27227276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Identifying the guilty word: Simultaneous versus sequential lineups for DRM word lists. Finley JR; Wixted JT; Roediger HL Mem Cognit; 2020 Aug; 48(6):903-919. PubMed ID: 32222916 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Enhancing lineup identification accuracy: two codes are better than one. Melara RD; DeWitt-Rickards TS; O'Brien TP J Appl Psychol; 1989 Oct; 74(5):706-13. PubMed ID: 2793771 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. The effect of lineup size on eyewitness identification. Akan M; Robinson MM; Mickes L; Wixted JT; Benjamin AS J Exp Psychol Appl; 2021 Jun; 27(2):369-392. PubMed ID: 33271047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Sequential lineup laps and eyewitness accuracy. Steblay NK; Dietrich HL; Ryan SL; Raczynski JL; James KA Law Hum Behav; 2011 Aug; 35(4):262-74. PubMed ID: 20632113 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The single lineup paradigm: A new way to manipulate target presence in eyewitness identification experiments. Oriet C; Fitzgerald RJ Law Hum Behav; 2018 Feb; 42(1):1-12. PubMed ID: 29461076 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Sequential lineup presentation promotes less-biased criterion setting but does not improve discriminability. Palmer MA; Brewer N Law Hum Behav; 2012 Jun; 36(3):247-55. PubMed ID: 22667814 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. sdtlu: An R package for the signal detection analysis of eyewitness lineup data. Cohen AL; Starns JJ; Rotello CM Behav Res Methods; 2021 Feb; 53(1):278-300. PubMed ID: 32700238 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Improving the identification accuracy of senior witnesses: do prelineup questions and sequential testing help? Memon A; Gabbert F J Appl Psychol; 2003 Apr; 88(2):341-7. PubMed ID: 12731718 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Eyewitness identification in simultaneous and sequential lineups: an investigation of position effects using receiver operating characteristics. Meisters J; Diedenhofen B; Musch J Memory; 2018 Oct; 26(9):1297-1309. PubMed ID: 29676666 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]