These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

216 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33120372)

  • 1. Monte Carlo calculation of quality correction factors based on air kerma and absorbed dose to water in medium energy x-ray beams.
    Czarnecki D; Zink K; Pimpinella M; Borbinha J; Teles P; Pinto M
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Dec; 65(24):245042. PubMed ID: 33120372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Extending the IAEA-AAPM TRS-483 methodology for radiation therapy machines with field sizes down to 10 × 2 cm
    Mirzakhanian L; Bassalow R; Huntzinger C; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2020 Oct; 47(10):5209-5221. PubMed ID: 32815187
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors in proton beams using TOPAS/GEANT4.
    Baumann KS; Kaupa S; Bach C; Engenhart-Cabillic R; Zink K
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Mar; 65(5):055015. PubMed ID: 31962306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Monte Carlo simulated beam quality and perturbation correction factors for ionization chambers in monoenergetic proton beams.
    Kretschmer J; Dulkys A; Brodbek L; Stelljes TS; Looe HK; Poppe B
    Med Phys; 2020 Nov; 47(11):5890-5905. PubMed ID: 32989779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. IAEA-AAPM TRS-483-based reference dosimetry of the new RefleXion biology-guided radiotherapy (BgRT) machine.
    Mirzakhanian L; Bassalow R; Zaks D; Huntzinger C; Seuntjens J
    Med Phys; 2021 Apr; 48(4):1884-1892. PubMed ID: 33296515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Comparison and uncertainty evaluation of different calibration protocols and ionization chambers for low-energy surface brachytherapy dosimetry.
    Candela-Juan C; Vijande J; García-Martínez T; Niatsetski Y; Nauta G; Schuurman J; Ouhib Z; Ballester F; Perez-Calatayud J
    Med Phys; 2015 Aug; 42(8):4954-64. PubMed ID: 26233221
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monte Carlo and
    Lawless MJ; Dimaso L; Palmer B; Micka J; Culberson WS; DeWerd LA
    Med Phys; 2018 Dec; 45(12):5564-5576. PubMed ID: 30273996
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Absorbed dose to water based dosimetry versus air kerma based dosimetry for high-energy photon beams: an experimental study.
    Palmans H; Nafaa L; De JJ; Gillis S; Hoornaert MT; Martens C; Piessens M; Thierens H; Van der Plaetsen A; Vynckier S
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Feb; 47(3):421-40. PubMed ID: 11848121
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monte Carlo calculation of beam quality correction factors for PTW cylindrical ionization chambers in photon beams.
    Giménez-Alventosa V; Giménez V; Ballester F; Vijande J; Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2020 Oct; 65(20):205005. PubMed ID: 32434170
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Protocols for the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams: a comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and previous international codes of practice. International Atomic Energy Agency.
    Andreo P; Huq MS; Westermark M; Song H; Tilikidis A; DeWerd L; Shortt K
    Phys Med Biol; 2002 Sep; 47(17):3033-53. PubMed ID: 12361209
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ionization chamber dosimetry based on
    Araki F; Ohno T; Umeno S
    Phys Med Biol; 2018 Sep; 63(18):185018. PubMed ID: 30101751
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of the IAEA TRS-398 and AAPM TG-51 absorbed dose to water protocols in the dosimetry of high-energy photon and electron beams.
    Huq MS; Andreo P; Song H
    Phys Med Biol; 2001 Nov; 46(11):2985-3006. PubMed ID: 11720359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Absorbed-dose beam quality conversion factors for cylindrical chambers in high energy photon beams.
    Seuntjens JP; Ross CK; Shortt KR; Rogers DW
    Med Phys; 2000 Dec; 27(12):2763-79. PubMed ID: 11190960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Response of LiF:Mg,Ti thermoluminescent dosimeters at photon energies relevant to the dosimetry of brachytherapy (<1 MeV).
    Tedgren AC; Hedman A; Grindborg JE; Carlsson GA
    Med Phys; 2011 Oct; 38(10):5539-50. PubMed ID: 21992372
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Comparison of high-energy photon and electron dosimetry for various dosimetry protocols.
    Araki F; Kubo HD
    Med Phys; 2002 May; 29(5):857-68. PubMed ID: 12033582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Monte Carlo calculated beam quality correction factors for two cylindrical ionization chambers in photon beams.
    Alissa M; Zink K; Tessier F; Schoenfeld AA; Czarnecki D
    Phys Med; 2022 Feb; 94():17-23. PubMed ID: 34972070
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Investigation of a synthetic diamond detector response in kilovoltage photon beams.
    Kaveckyte V; Persson L; Malusek A; Benmakhlouf H; Alm Carlsson G; Carlsson Tedgren Å
    Med Phys; 2020 Mar; 47(3):1268-1279. PubMed ID: 31880809
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Experimental and Monte Carlo-based determination of magnetic field correction factors
    Alissa M; Zink K; Kapsch RP; Schoenfeld AA; Frick S; Czarnecki D
    Med Phys; 2023 Jul; 50(7):4578-4589. PubMed ID: 36897832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of penh, fluka, and Geant4/topas for absorbed dose calculations in air cavities representing ionization chambers in high-energy photon and proton beams.
    Baumann KS; Horst F; Zink K; Gomà C
    Med Phys; 2019 Oct; 46(10):4639-4653. PubMed ID: 31350915
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Data for the dosimetry of low- and medium-energy kV x rays.
    Andreo P
    Phys Med Biol; 2019 Oct; 64(20):205019. PubMed ID: 31491771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 11.