These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

189 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33121749)

  • 1. Importance of proper conduct of clinical trials.
    Cortegiani A; Absalom AR
    Br J Anaesth; 2021 Feb; 126(2):354-356. PubMed ID: 33121749
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Alternatives to Randomised Controlled Trials for the Poor, the Impatient, and When Evaluating Emerging Technologies.
    Mani K; Björck M
    Eur J Vasc Endovasc Surg; 2019 Apr; 57(4):598-599. PubMed ID: 30509892
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Learning From Major Clinical Trials: Bending Without Breaking.
    Pfeffer MA
    Circulation; 2017 Dec; 136(23):2207-2209. PubMed ID: 29203564
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Bayesian Analysis: A Practical Approach to Interpret Clinical Trials and Create Clinical Practice Guidelines.
    Bittl JA; He Y
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2017 Aug; 10(8):. PubMed ID: 28798016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Bayesian statistical inference enhances the interpretation of contemporary randomized controlled trials.
    Wijeysundera DN; Austin PC; Hux JE; Beattie WS; Laupacis A
    J Clin Epidemiol; 2009 Jan; 62(1):13-21.e5. PubMed ID: 18947971
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Distinguishing Between Efficacy and Real-World Effectiveness: The Case for Thinking Beyond Classic Randomized Controlled Trial Design.
    Sites BD; Masaracchia MM; Davis M
    Reg Anesth Pain Med; 2017; 42(2):131-132. PubMed ID: 28207640
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Statistics Commentary Series. Commentary No. 43: Patient Preference Trials.
    Streiner DL
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2020; 40(6):529-530. PubMed ID: 33044357
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Randomised trials in context: practical problems and social aspects of evidence-based medicine and policy.
    Pearce W; Raman S; Turner A
    Trials; 2015 Sep; 16():394. PubMed ID: 26341114
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Statistics Commentary Series. Commentary No. 44: Internal and External Validity.
    Streiner DL
    J Clin Psychopharmacol; 2020; 40(6):531-533. PubMed ID: 33044353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Re: The design versus the analysis of observational studies for causal effects: parallels with the design of randomized trials.
    Shrier I
    Stat Med; 2008 Jun; 27(14):2740-1; author reply 2741-2. PubMed ID: 18069729
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. What Constitutes an Independent Statistical Analysis?
    Abraham A; Ahn R; Woodbridge A; Madden E; Keyhani S; Korenstein D
    J Gen Intern Med; 2018 Jun; 33(6):786-788. PubMed ID: 29549498
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Guided by the research design: choosing the right statistical test.
    Beath A; Jones MP
    Med J Aust; 2018 Mar; 208(4):163-165. PubMed ID: 29490219
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The citation of relevant systematic reviews and randomised trials in published reports of trial protocols.
    Pandis N; Fleming PS; Koletsi D; Hopewell S
    Trials; 2016 Dec; 17(1):581. PubMed ID: 27927219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Describing the participants in a study.
    Pickering RM
    Age Ageing; 2017 Jul; 46(4):576-581. PubMed ID: 28472376
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. The analysis of 168 randomised controlled trials to test data integrity.
    Fujii Y
    Anaesthesia; 2012 Jun; 67(6):669-70; author reply 670. PubMed ID: 22512837
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Systematic Evaluation of the Robustness of the Evidence Supporting Current Guidelines on Myocardial Revascularization Using the Fragility Index.
    Gaudino M; Hameed I; Biondi-Zoccai G; Tam DY; Gerry S; Rahouma M; Khan FM; Angiolillo DJ; Benedetto U; Taggart DP; Girardi LN; Crea F; Ruel M; Fremes SE
    Circ Cardiovasc Qual Outcomes; 2019 Dec; 12(12):e006017. PubMed ID: 31822120
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. The role and significance of sensitivity analyses in enhancing the statistical validity of clinical studies.
    Baiocchi M; Woo YJ; Chiu P; Goldstone AB
    J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2022 Feb; 163(2):749-753. PubMed ID: 33229182
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Editorial: Randomised controlled trials of factorial design alias on how to speed up research on effectiveness of interventions without compromising its validity.
    Esposito M; Nieri M
    Eur J Oral Implantol; 2016; 9(1):3-4. PubMed ID: 27022633
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Clinical trials methodology: randomization, intent-to-treat, and random-effects regression.
    Atkins DC
    Depress Anxiety; 2009; 26(8):697-700. PubMed ID: 19658122
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. In brief: statistics in brief: Confidence intervals: what is the real result in the target population?
    Dorey FJ
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2010 Nov; 468(11):3137-8. PubMed ID: 20532716
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.