These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33121923)

  • 1. N100m latency shortening caused by selective attention.
    Nomura Y; Kawase T; Kanno A; Nakasato N; Kawashima R; Katori Y
    Brain Res; 2021 Jan; 1751():147177. PubMed ID: 33121923
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Rapid change of tonotopic maps in the human auditory cortex during pitch discrimination.
    Ozaki I; Jin CY; Suzuki Y; Baba M; Matsunaga M; Hashimoto I
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Jul; 115(7):1592-604. PubMed ID: 15203060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Neuromagnetic evidence for a pitch processing center in Heschl's gyrus.
    Krumbholz K; Patterson RD; Seither-Preisler A; Lammertmann C; Lütkenhöner B
    Cereb Cortex; 2003 Jul; 13(7):765-72. PubMed ID: 12816892
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Latency of auditory evoked field deflection N100m ruled by pitch or spectrum?
    Lütkenhöner B; Lammertmann C; Knecht S
    Audiol Neurootol; 2001; 6(5):263-78. PubMed ID: 11729329
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Increased right auditory cortex activity in absolute pitch possessors.
    Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
    Neuroreport; 2005 Nov; 16(16):1775-9. PubMed ID: 16237325
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. N100m in adults possessing absolute pitch.
    Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
    Neuroreport; 2004 Jun; 15(9):1383-6. PubMed ID: 15194857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. [Right hemispheric dominancy in the auditory evoked magnetic fields for pure-tone stimuli].
    Kanno A; Nakasato N; Fujiwara S; Yoshimoto T
    No To Shinkei; 1996 Mar; 48(3):240-4. PubMed ID: 8868334
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Evidence of pitch processing in the N100m component of the auditory evoked field.
    Seither-Preisler A; Patterson R; Krumbholz K; Seither S; Lütkenhöner B
    Hear Res; 2006 Mar; 213(1-2):88-98. PubMed ID: 16464550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Single-dipole analyses of the N100m are not suitable for characterizing the cortical representation of pitch.
    Lütkenhöner B
    Audiol Neurootol; 2003; 8(4):222-33. PubMed ID: 12811003
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. N100m in children possessing absolute pitch.
    Hirose H; Kubota M; Kimura I; Yumoto M; Sakakihara Y
    Neuroreport; 2003 May; 14(6):899-903. PubMed ID: 12858057
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. [N100m findings of auditory-evoked fields in patients with psychogenic hearing impairment].
    Sakamoto M; Itasaka Y; Ishikawa K
    Nihon Jibiinkoka Gakkai Kaiho; 2007 Oct; 110(10):672-9. PubMed ID: 18018595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus duration influences the dipole location shift within the auditory evoked field component N100m.
    Rosburg T; Haueisen J; Sauer H
    Brain Topogr; 2002; 15(1):37-41. PubMed ID: 12371675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Preattentive cortical-evoked responses to pure tones, harmonic tones, and speech: influence of music training.
    Nikjeh DA; Lister JJ; Frisch SA
    Ear Hear; 2009 Aug; 30(4):432-46. PubMed ID: 19494778
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Auditory cortical responses evoked by pure tones in healthy and sensorineural hearing loss subjects: functional MRI and magnetoencephalography.
    Zhang YT; Geng ZJ; Zhang Q; Li W; Zhang J
    Chin Med J (Engl); 2006 Sep; 119(18):1548-54. PubMed ID: 16996009
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Auditory attention affects two different areas in the human supratemporal cortex.
    Rif J; Hari R; Hämäläinen MS; Sams M
    Electroencephalogr Clin Neurophysiol; 1991 Dec; 79(6):464-72. PubMed ID: 1721574
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Healthy-side dominance of middle- and long-latency neuromagnetic fields in idiopathic sudden sensorineural hearing loss.
    Li LP; Shiao AS; Chen LF; Niddam DM; Chang SY; Lien CF; Lee SK; Hsieh JC
    Eur J Neurosci; 2006 Aug; 24(3):937-46. PubMed ID: 16930421
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dynamics of cortical responses to tone pairs in relation to task difficulty: a MEG study.
    Nahum M; Renvall H; Ahissar M
    Hum Brain Mapp; 2009 May; 30(5):1592-604. PubMed ID: 18711706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Two-stage processing of sounds explains behavioral performance variations due to changes in stimulus contrast and selective attention: an MEG study.
    Kauramäki J; Jääskeläinen IP; Hänninen JL; Auranen T; Nummenmaa A; Lampinen J; Sams M
    PLoS One; 2012; 7(10):e46872. PubMed ID: 23071654
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Effects of tone repetition on auditory evoked neuromagnetic fields.
    Rosburg T
    Clin Neurophysiol; 2004 Apr; 115(4):898-905. PubMed ID: 15003771
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Auditory cortical responses in humans with profound unilateral sensorineural hearing loss from early childhood.
    Vasama JP; Mäkelä JP
    Hear Res; 1997 Feb; 104(1-2):183-90. PubMed ID: 9119762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.