141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33123220)
1. Templating in shoulder arthroplasty - A comparison of 2D CT to 3D CT planning software: A systematic review.
Olaiya OR; Nadeem I; Horner NS; Bedi A; Leroux T; Alolabi B; Khan M
Shoulder Elbow; 2020 Oct; 12(5):303-314. PubMed ID: 33123220
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. The influence of three-dimensional planning on decision-making in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BS; Hudek R; Burkhart KJ; Gohlke F
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2017 Aug; 26(8):1477-1483. PubMed ID: 28162884
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Variability and reliability of 2-dimensional vs. 3-dimensional glenoid version measurements with 3-dimensional preoperative planning software.
Reid JJ; Kunkle BF; Greene AT; Eichinger JK; Friedman RJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2022 Feb; 31(2):302-309. PubMed ID: 34411724
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Accuracy of 3-Dimensional Planning, Implant Templating, and Patient-Specific Instrumentation in Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Iannotti JP; Walker K; Rodriguez E; Patterson TE; Jun BJ; Ricchetti ET
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2019 Mar; 101(5):446-457. PubMed ID: 30845039
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Mixed-reality improves execution of templated glenoid component positioning in shoulder arthroplasty: a CT imaging analysis.
Kopriva JM; McKissack HM; Griswold BG; Hussain ZB; Cooke HL; Gottschalk MB; Wagner ER
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2024 Feb; ():. PubMed ID: 38320671
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Three-Dimensional Templating and Use of Standard Instrumentation in Primary Anatomic Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Amini MH; Ricchetti ET; Iannotti JP
JBJS Essent Surg Tech; 2017 Sep; 7(3):e28. PubMed ID: 30233963
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Surgeon acceptance of an initial 3D glenoid preoperative plan: rates and risk factors.
Hartzler RU; Denard PJ; Griffin JW; Werner BC; Romeo AA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Apr; 30(4):787-794. PubMed ID: 32650080
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Three-dimensional measures of posterior bone loss and retroversion in Walch B2 glenoids predict the need for an augmented anatomic glenoid component.
Cronin KJ; Kirsch JM; Gates S; Patel MS; Joyce CD; Hill BW; Gutman MJ; Williams GR; Namdari S
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Oct; 30(10):2386-2392. PubMed ID: 33753274
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The addition of preoperative three-dimensional analysis alters implant choice in shoulder arthroplasty.
Werner BC; Denard PJ; Tokish JM; Bedi A; Donegan RP; Metcalfe N; Dines JS
Shoulder Elbow; 2022 Aug; 14(4):378-384. PubMed ID: 35846399
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Variability in total shoulder arthroplasty planning software compared to a control CT-derived 3D printed scapula.
Shah SS; Sahota S; Denard PJ; Provencher MT; Parsons BO; Hartzler RU; Dines JS
Shoulder Elbow; 2021 Jun; 13(3):268-275. PubMed ID: 34659466
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Insufficient consensus regarding circle size and bone loss width using the ratio-"best fit circle"-method even with three-dimensional computed tomography.
Lacheta L; Herbst E; Voss A; Braun S; Jungmann P; Millett PJ; Imhoff A; Martetschläger F
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc; 2019 Oct; 27(10):3222-3229. PubMed ID: 30725122
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Evaluation of Preoperative Implant Placement in Total Shoulder Arthroplasty.
Hamilton MA; Polakovic S; Saadi P; Jones RB; Parsons IM; Cheung EV
Bull Hosp Jt Dis (2013); 2015 Dec; 73 Suppl 1():S47-51. PubMed ID: 26631196
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Determining glenoid component version after total shoulder arthroplasty.
Mehta MP; Vogel LA; Shiu BB; Dennis ER; Petkovic D; Levine WN; Jobin CM
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2018 Sep; 27(9):1588-1595. PubMed ID: 29759906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Automated Three-Dimensional Measurement of Glenoid Version and Inclination in Arthritic Shoulders.
Boileau P; Cheval D; Gauci MO; Holzer N; Chaoui J; Walch G
J Bone Joint Surg Am; 2018 Jan; 100(1):57-65. PubMed ID: 29298261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. The reverse shoulder arthroplasty angle: a new measurement of glenoid inclination for reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Boileau P; Gauci MO; Wagner ER; Clowez G; Chaoui J; Chelli M; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Jul; 28(7):1281-1290. PubMed ID: 30935825
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Is preoperative planning effective for intraoperative glenoid implant size and type selection during anatomic and reverse shoulder arthroplasty?
Raiss P; Walch G; Wittmann T; Athwal GS
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2123-2127. PubMed ID: 32340791
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. 3D preoperative planning for humeral head selection in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Lima DJL; Markel J; Yawman JP; Whaley JD; Sabesan VJ
Musculoskelet Surg; 2020 Aug; 104(2):155-161. PubMed ID: 30949924
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Impact of preoperative 3-dimensional planning and intraoperative navigation of shoulder arthroplasty on implant selection and operative time: a single surgeon's experience.
Rosenthal Y; Rettig SA; Virk MS; Zuckerman JD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Dec; 29(12):2564-2570. PubMed ID: 33190756
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Proper benefit of a three dimensional pre-operative planning software for glenoid component positioning in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Jacquot A; Gauci MO; Chaoui J; Baba M; Deransart P; Boileau P; Mole D; Walch G
Int Orthop; 2018 Dec; 42(12):2897-2906. PubMed ID: 29968136
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Reduction of scapulohumeral subluxation with posterior augmented glenoid implants in anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: Short-term 3D comparison between pre- and post-operative CT.
Terrier A; Goetti P; Becce F; Farron A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2020 Jun; 106(4):681-686. PubMed ID: 32284278
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
