141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33123220)
21. Version and inclination obtained with 3-dimensional planning in total shoulder arthroplasty: do different programs produce the same results?
Denard PJ; Provencher MT; Lädermann A; Romeo AA; Parsons BO; Dines JS
JSES Open Access; 2018 Dec; 2(4):200-204. PubMed ID: 30675595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Does commercially available shoulder arthroplasty preoperative planning software agree with surgeon measurements of version, inclination, and subluxation?
Erickson BJ; Chalmers PN; Denard P; Lederman E; Horneff G; Werner BC; Provencher MT; Romeo AA
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2021 Feb; 30(2):413-420. PubMed ID: 32544424
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Three-dimensional planning and use of patient-specific guides improve glenoid component position: an in vitro study.
Walch G; Vezeridis PS; Boileau P; Deransart P; Chaoui J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2015 Feb; 24(2):302-9. PubMed ID: 25183662
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Reliability of measurements performed on two dimensional and three dimensional computed tomography in glenoid assessment for instability.
Kubicka AM; Stefaniak J; Lubiatowski P; Długosz J; Dzianach M; Redman M; Piontek J; Romanowski L
Int Orthop; 2016 Dec; 40(12):2581-2588. PubMed ID: 27492723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Assessment of surgeon variability in preoperative planning of reverse total shoulder arthroplasty: a quantitative comparison of 49 cases planned by 9 surgeons.
Parsons M; Greene A; Polakovic S; Byram I; Cheung E; Jones R; Papandrea R; Youderian A; Wright T; Flurin PH; Zuckerman J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Oct; 29(10):2080-2088. PubMed ID: 32471752
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative study of glenoid version and inclination using two-dimensional images from computed tomography and three-dimensional reconstructed bone models.
Choi CH; Kim HC; Kang D; Kim JY
Clin Shoulder Elb; 2020 Sep; 23(3):119-124. PubMed ID: 33330245
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Pre-operative arthritic glenoid assessment: 3D automated planning software versus manual multiplanar measurements of version and inclination.
Hall T; Wong JRY; Dirckx M; Rajesparan K; Rashid A
J Orthop; 2023 Feb; 36():24-28. PubMed ID: 36582547
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Reliability of a novel 3-dimensional computed tomography method for reverse shoulder arthroplasty postoperative evaluation.
Venne G; Pickell M; Ellis RE; Bicknell RT
JSES Open Access; 2019 Oct; 3(3):168-173. PubMed ID: 31709357
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Computer navigation leads to more accurate glenoid targeting during total shoulder arthroplasty compared with 3-dimensional preoperative planning alone.
Schoch BS; Haupt E; Leonor T; Farmer KW; Wright TW; King JJ
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Nov; 29(11):2257-2263. PubMed ID: 32586595
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Intersurgeon and intrasurgeon variability in preoperative planning of anatomic total shoulder arthroplasty: a quantitative comparison of 49 cases planned by 9 surgeons.
Parsons M; Greene A; Polakovic S; Rohrs E; Byram I; Cheung E; Jones R; Papandrea R; Youderian A; Wright T; Flurin PH; Zuckerman J
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2020 Dec; 29(12):2610-2618. PubMed ID: 33190760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Comparison of the accuracy of 2D and 3D templating methods for planning primary total hip replacement: a systematic review and meta-analysis.
Bishi H; Smith JBV; Asopa V; Field RE; Wang C; Sochart DH
EFORT Open Rev; 2022 Jan; 7(1):70-83. PubMed ID: 35076413
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Computer navigation re-creates planned glenoid placement and reduces correction variability in total shoulder arthroplasty: an in vivo case-control study.
Nashikkar PS; Scholes CJ; Haber MD
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2019 Dec; 28(12):e398-e409. PubMed ID: 31353300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Patient-specific glenoid guides provide accuracy and reproducibility in total shoulder arthroplasty.
Gauci MO; Boileau P; Baba M; Chaoui J; Walch G
Bone Joint J; 2016 Aug; 98-B(8):1080-5. PubMed ID: 27482021
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Preoperative planning for accurate glenoid component positioning in reverse shoulder arthroplasty.
Berhouet J; Gulotta LV; Dines DM; Craig E; Warren RF; Choi D; Chen X; Kontaxis A
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 May; 103(3):407-413. PubMed ID: 28238965
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Design and development of a computer assisted glenoid implantation technique for shoulder replacement surgery.
Nguyen D; Ferreira LM; Brownhill JR; Faber KJ; Johnson JA
Comput Aided Surg; 2007 May; 12(3):152-9. PubMed ID: 17538787
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Accuracy and reproducibility of preoperative three-dimensional planning for total hip arthroplasty using biplanar low-dose radiographs : A pilot study.
Mainard D; Barbier O; Knafo Y; Belleville R; Mainard-Simard L; Gross JB
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2017 Jun; 103(4):531-536. PubMed ID: 28323248
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Accuracy of the preoperative planning for cementless total hip arthroplasty. A randomised comparison between three-dimensional computerised planning and conventional templating.
Sariali E; Mauprivez R; Khiami F; Pascal-Mousselard H; Catonné Y
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2012 Apr; 98(2):151-8. PubMed ID: 22381566
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Reliability analysis of glenoid component inclination measurements on postoperative radiographs and computed tomography-based 3D models in total and reversed shoulder arthroplasty patients.
Van Haver A; Heylen S; Vuylsteke K; Declercq G; Verborgt O
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Apr; 25(4):632-40. PubMed ID: 26652701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Comparison of glenoid inclination angle using different clinical imaging modalities.
Daggett M; Werner B; Gauci MO; Chaoui J; Walch G
J Shoulder Elbow Surg; 2016 Feb; 25(2):180-5. PubMed ID: 26356363
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. CT-Based 3D Printing of the Glenoid Prior to Shoulder Arthroplasty: Bony Morphology and Model Evaluation.
Wang KC; Jones A; Kambhampati S; Gilotra MN; Liacouras PC; Stuelke S; Shiu B; Leong N; Hasan SA; Siegel EL
J Digit Imaging; 2019 Oct; 32(5):816-826. PubMed ID: 30820811
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
