321 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33123329)
21. Carpentier-Edwards PERIMOUNT Magna bioprosthesis: a stented valve with stentless performance?
Totaro P; Degno N; Zaidi A; Youhana A; Argano V
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2005 Dec; 130(6):1668-74. PubMed ID: 16308014
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Comparable long-term results for porcine and pericardial prostheses after isolated aortic valve replacement.
Andreas M; Wallner S; Ruetzler K; Wiedemann D; Ehrlich M; Heinze G; Binder T; Moritz A; Hiesmayr MJ; Kocher A; Laufer G
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2015 Oct; 48(4):557-61. PubMed ID: 25527170
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. A prospective, randomized comparison of 3 contemporary bioprosthetic aortic valves: should hemodynamic performance influence device selection?
Suri RM; Michelena HI; Burkhart HM; Greason KL; Daly RC; Dearani JA; Park SJ; Joyce LD; Stulak JM; Sundt TM; Li Z; Schaff HV
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2012 Dec; 144(6):1387-95, 1398; discussion 1395-7. PubMed ID: 23140964
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Aortic annulus diameter and valve design each determine the valve size implanted.
von Oppell UO; Segadal L; Busund R; Johnston GG; Dimitrakakis G; Masani N; Lung TH
J Heart Valve Dis; 2012 Sep; 21(5):591-8. PubMed ID: 23167223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. The Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna aortic xenograft: a new design with an improved hemodynamic performance.
Dalmau MJ; Maríagonzález-Santos J; López-Rodríguez J; Bueno M; Arribas A
Interact Cardiovasc Thorac Surg; 2006 Jun; 5(3):263-7. PubMed ID: 17670564
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Rapid Deployment Aortic Valves Deliver Superior Hemodynamic Performance In Vitro.
Ai L; Chen H; Lin V; Bapat VN
Innovations (Phila); 2017; 12(5):338-345. PubMed ID: 29023351
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Differences in Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards porcine xenograft aortic valve hemodynamics. Effect of valve size.
Khan SS; Mitchell RS; Derby GC; Oyer PE; Miller DC
Circulation; 1990 Nov; 82(5 Suppl):IV117-24. PubMed ID: 2225396
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. In vivo hemodynamic comparison of porcine and pericardial valves.
Cosgrove DM; Lytle BW; Gill CC; Golding LA; Stewart RW; Loop FD; Williams GW
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 1985 Mar; 89(3):358-68. PubMed ID: 3974271
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Doppler hemodynamic evaluation of prosthetic (Starr-Edwards and Björk-Shiley) and bioprosthetic (Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards) cardiac valves.
Williams GA; Labovitz AJ
Am J Cardiol; 1985 Aug; 56(4):325-32. PubMed ID: 4025173
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Are stentless valves hemodynamically superior to stented valves? Long-term follow-up of a randomized trial comparing Carpentier-Edwards pericardial valve with the Toronto Stentless Porcine Valve.
Cohen G; Zagorski B; Christakis GT; Joyner CD; Vincent J; Sever J; Harbi S; Feder-Elituv R; Moussa F; Goldman BS; Fremes SE
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2010 Apr; 139(4):848-59. PubMed ID: 20080264
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Matched Comparison of Two Different Biological Prostheses for Complete Supra-annular Aortic Valve Replacement.
Fiegl K; Deutsch MA; Rondak IC; Lange R; Guenzinger R
Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2015 Sep; 63(6):459-66. PubMed ID: 25893918
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Carpentier-Edwards aortic pericardial bioprosthetic valve as a valid control in preclinical in vivo ovine studies.
Harvey L; Bianco R; Lahti M; Carney J; Zhang L; Robinson N
Eur J Pharmacol; 2015 Jul; 759():192-9. PubMed ID: 25814251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Small aortic annulus: the hydrodynamic performances of 5 commercially available tissue valves.
Gerosa G; Tarzia V; Rizzoli G; Bottio T
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2006 May; 131(5):1058-64. PubMed ID: 16678590
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Hemodynamic evaluation of Hancock and Carpentier-Edwards bioprostheses.
Levine FH; Carter JE; Buckley MJ; Daggett WM; Akins CW; Austen WG
Circulation; 1981 Aug; 64(2 Pt 2):II192-5. PubMed ID: 7249322
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Early in-vivo hemodynamic comparison of supra-annular aortic bioprostheses: Trifecta versus Perimount Magna Ease.
Modi A; Pousios D; Sadeque S; Velissaris T; Barlow C; Livesey S; Tsang GM; Ohri SK
J Heart Valve Dis; 2014 May; 23(3):325-32. PubMed ID: 25296457
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Hemodynamic performance of the Medtronic Mosaic and Perimount Magna aortic bioprostheses: five-year results of a prospectively randomized study.
Dalmau MJ; González-Santos JM; Blázquez JA; Sastre JA; López-Rodríguez J; Bueno M; Castaño M; Arribas A
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg; 2011 Jun; 39(6):844-52; discussion 852. PubMed ID: 21193320
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Mid-term comparative follow-up after aortic valve replacement with Carpentier-Edwards and Pericarbon pericardial prostheses.
Le Tourneau T; Savoye C; McFadden EP; Grandmougin D; Carton HF; Hennequin JL; Dubar A; Fayad G; Warembourg H
Circulation; 1999 Nov; 100(19 Suppl):II11-6. PubMed ID: 10567272
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Primary echocardiographic results of the Carpentier-Edwards Perimount Magna.
Mizoguchi H; Sakaki M; Inoue K; Kobayashi Y; Iwata T; Suehiro Y; Miura T
J Med Ultrason (2001); 2012 Jul; 39(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 27278975
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Results of a propensity score-matched comparison of the Perimount Magna and Mosaic Ultra aortic valve prostheses.
Wendt D; Buck T; Jánosi RA; Thielmann M; Pul U; Neuhäuser M; Piotrowski JA; Massoudy P; Kamler M; Erbel R; Jakob H
J Heart Valve Dis; 2009 Nov; 18(6):703-11; discussion 712. PubMed ID: 20099721
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Effect of aortic pericardial valve choice on outcomes and left ventricular mass regression in patients with left ventricular hypertrophy.
Rubens FD; Gee YY; Ngu JM; Chen L; Burwash IG
J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg; 2016 Nov; 152(5):1291-1298.e2. PubMed ID: 27423336
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
