164 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33123471)
1. Identification of Ovarian Cancer Patients Most Likely to Achieve Chemotherapy Response Score 3 Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy: Development of a Predictive Nomogram.
Liang WF; Li H; Wu JY; Liu CH; Wu MF; Li J
Front Oncol; 2020; 10():560888. PubMed ID: 33123471
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. The added value of CA125 normalization before interval debulking surgery to the chemotherapy response score for the prognostication of ovarian cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for advanced disease.
Liang WF; Wang LJ; Li H; Liu CH; Wu MF; Li J
J Cancer; 2021; 12(3):946-953. PubMed ID: 33403051
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Pathological chemotherapy response score is prognostic in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma: A systematic review and meta-analysis of individual patient data.
Cohen PA; Powell A; Böhm S; Gilks CB; Stewart CJR; Meniawy TM; Bulsara M; Avril S; Brockbank EC; Bosse T; de Azevedo Focchi GR; Ganesan R; Glasspool RM; Howitt BE; Kim HS; Lee JY; Le ND; Lockley M; Manchanda R; Mandalia T; McCluggage WG; McNeish I; Midha D; Srinivasan R; Tan YY; van der Griend R; Yunokawa M; Zannoni GF; ; Singh N
Gynecol Oncol; 2019 Aug; 154(2):441-448. PubMed ID: 31118141
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The chemotherapy response score is a useful histological predictor of prognosis in high-grade serous carcinoma.
Singh P; Kaushal V; Rai B; Rajwanshi A; Gupta N; Dey P; Garg R; Rohilla M; Suri V; Ghoshal S; Srinivasan R
Histopathology; 2018 Mar; 72(4):619-625. PubMed ID: 28914967
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. External validation of chemotherapy response score system for histopathological assessment of tumor regression after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in tubo-ovarian high-grade serous carcinoma.
Lee JY; Chung YS; Na K; Kim HM; Park CK; Nam EJ; Kim S; Kim SW; Kim YT; Kim HS
J Gynecol Oncol; 2017 Nov; 28(6):e73. PubMed ID: 28758379
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Prognostic implications of histological tumor regression (Böhm's score) in patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade serous tubal & ovarian carcinoma.
Rajkumar S; Polson A; Nath R; Lane G; Sayasneh A; Jakes A; Begum S; Mehra G
Gynecol Oncol; 2018 Nov; 151(2):264-268. PubMed ID: 30197060
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Prognostic Value of Pathologic Chemotherapy Response Score in Patients With Ovarian Cancer After Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.
Michaan N; Chong WY; Han NY; Lim MC; Park SY
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2018 Nov; 28(9):1676-1682. PubMed ID: 30256239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Prognostic Role of Histological Tumor Regression in Patients Receiving Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for High-Grade Serous Tubo-ovarian Carcinoma.
Coghlan E; Meniawy TM; Munro A; Bulsara M; Stewart CJ; Tan A; Koay MHE; MaGee D; Codde J; Tan J; Salfinger SG; Mohan GR; Leung Y; Nichols CB; Cohen PA
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2017 May; 27(4):708-713. PubMed ID: 28441251
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Response evaluation after neoadjuvant therapy: evaluation of chemotherapy response score and serological and/or radiological assessment of response in ovarian cancer patients.
Ramspott JP; Baert T; MacKintosh ML; Traut A; Ataseven B; Bommert M; Heitz F; Plett H; Schneider S; Waltering KU; Heikaus S; Harter P; du Bois A
Arch Gynecol Obstet; 2021 Oct; 304(4):1021-1032. PubMed ID: 33661392
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Individualized model for predicting pathological complete response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with breast cancer: A multicenter study.
Qian B; Yang J; Zhou J; Hu L; Zhang S; Ren M; Qu X
Front Endocrinol (Lausanne); 2022; 13():955250. PubMed ID: 36060977
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. A Nomogram to Predict Disease-Free Survival Following Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy for Triple Negative Breast Cancer.
Zhu M; Liang C; Zhang F; Zhu L; Chen D
Front Oncol; 2021; 11():690336. PubMed ID: 34745934
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Assessment of a Chemotherapy Response Score (CRS) System for Tubo-Ovarian High-Grade Serous Carcinoma (HGSC).
Ditzel HM; Strickland KC; Meserve EE; Stover E; Konstantinopoulos PA; Matulonis UA; Muto MG; Liu JF; Feltmate C; Horowitz N; Berkowitz RS; Gupta M; Hecht JL; Lin DI; Jochumsen KM; Welch WR; Hirsch MS; Quade BJ; Lee KR; Crum CP; Mutter GL; Nucci MR; Howitt BE
Int J Gynecol Pathol; 2019 May; 38(3):230-240. PubMed ID: 29750700
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Correlating the KELIM (CA125 elimination rate constant K) score and the chemo-response score as predictors of chemosensitivity in patients with advanced ovarian carcinoma.
Piedimonte S; Murray C; Atenafu EG; Rouzbahman M; Lheureux S; May T
Gynecol Oncol; 2024 May; 187():92-97. PubMed ID: 38735145
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Nomogram based on quantitative dynamic contrast-enhanced magnetic resonance imaging, apparent diffusion coefficient, and clinicopathological features for early prediction of pathologic complete response in breast cancer patients receiving neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
He M; Su J; Ruan H; Song Y; Ma M; Xue F
Quant Imaging Med Surg; 2023 Jul; 13(7):4089-4102. PubMed ID: 37456283
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Pathologic response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy in ovarian cancer and its association with outcome: A surrogate marker of survival.
Marsh LA; Kim TH; Zhang M; Kubalanza K; Treece CL; Chase D; Memarzadeh S; Salani R; Karlan B; Rao J; Konecny GE
Gynecol Oncol; 2023 Oct; 177():173-179. PubMed ID: 37716223
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Lymphocytic infiltration and Chemotherapy Response Score as prognostic markers in ovarian cancer patients treated with Neoadjuvant chemotherapy.
Liontos M; Sotiropoulou M; Kaparelou M; Tzannis K; Tsironis G; Kyriazoglou A; Tsiara A; Zakopoulou R; Koutsoukos K; Zagouri F; Thomakos N; Haidopoulos D; Rodolakis A; Dimopoulos MA; Bamias A
Gynecol Oncol; 2020 Jun; 157(3):599-605. PubMed ID: 32173048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. A Practical Predictive Model Based on Ultrasound Imaging and Clinical Indices for Estimation of Response to Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Breast Cancer.
Ye P; Duan H; Zhao Z; Fang S
Cancer Manag Res; 2021; 13():7783-7793. PubMed ID: 34675673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Development and Validation of a Nomogram for the Estimation of Response to Platinum-Based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Locally Advanced Cervical Cancer.
Chen W; Wang B; Zeng R; Wang T
Cancer Manag Res; 2021; 13():1279-1289. PubMed ID: 33603473
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. External validation of a 'response score' after neoadjuvant chemotherapy in patients with high-grade serous ovarian carcinoma with complete clinical response.
Zorzato PC; Zannoni GF; Tudisco R; Pasciuto T; Di Giorgio A; Franchi M; Scambia G; Fagotti A
Int J Gynecol Cancer; 2020 Jan; 30(1):67-73. PubMed ID: 31754067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Primary debulking surgery versus primary neoadjuvant chemotherapy for high grade advanced stage ovarian cancer: comparison of survivals.
Kobal B; Noventa M; Cvjeticanin B; Barbic M; Meglic L; Herzog M; Bordi G; Vitagliano A; Saccardi C; Skof E
Radiol Oncol; 2018 Sep; 52(3):307-319. PubMed ID: 30210049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
