BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

181 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33123794)

  • 1. Variability in interpretation of low-dose chest CT using computerized assessment in a nationwide lung cancer screening program: comparison of prospective reading at individual institutions and retrospective central reading.
    Hwang EJ; Goo JM; Kim HY; Yoon SH; Jin GY; Yi J; Kim Y
    Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):2845-2855. PubMed ID: 33123794
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Implementation of the cloud-based computerized interpretation system in a nationwide lung cancer screening with low-dose CT: comparison with the conventional reading system.
    Hwang EJ; Goo JM; Kim HY; Yi J; Yoon SH; Kim Y
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Jan; 31(1):475-485. PubMed ID: 32797309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Detection of Subsolid Nodules in Lung Cancer Screening: Complementary Sensitivity of Visual Reading and Computer-Aided Diagnosis.
    Silva M; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Jacobs C; Capretti G; Ciompi F; van Ginneken B; Pastorino U; Sverzellati N
    Invest Radiol; 2018 Aug; 53(8):441-449. PubMed ID: 29543693
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cloud-based computer-aided detection system improves identification of lung nodules on computed tomography scans of patients with extra-thoracic malignancies.
    Vassallo L; Traverso A; Agnello M; Bracco C; Campanella D; Chiara G; Fantacci ME; Lopez Torres E; Manca A; Saletta M; Giannini V; Mazzetti S; Stasi M; Cerello P; Regge D
    Eur Radiol; 2019 Jan; 29(1):144-152. PubMed ID: 29948089
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Application of computer-aided diagnosis for Lung-RADS categorization in CT screening for lung cancer: effect on inter-reader agreement.
    Park S; Park H; Lee SM; Ahn Y; Kim W; Jung K; Seo JB
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Feb; 32(2):1054-1064. PubMed ID: 34331112
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Lung cancer screening by nodule volume in Lung-RADS v1.1: negative baseline CT yields potential for increased screening interval.
    Silva M; Milanese G; Sestini S; Sabia F; Jacobs C; van Ginneken B; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop CM; Marchianò A; Sverzellati N; Pastorino U
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Apr; 31(4):1956-1968. PubMed ID: 32997182
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Interobserver variability in Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System categorisation in subsolid nodule-enriched lung cancer screening CTs.
    Yoon SH; Kim YJ; Doh K; Kim J; Lee KH; Lee KW; Kim J
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):7184-7191. PubMed ID: 33733688
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Optimum diameter threshold for lung nodules at baseline lung cancer screening with low-dose chest CT: exploration of results from the Korean Lung Cancer Screening Project.
    Hwang EJ; Goo JM; Kim HY; Yi J; Kim Y
    Eur Radiol; 2021 Sep; 31(9):7202-7212. PubMed ID: 33738597
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Computer-aided diagnosis system versus conventional reading system in low-dose (< 2 mSv) computed tomography: comparative study for patients at risk of lung cancer.
    Wang D; Cao L; Li B
    Sao Paulo Med J; 2022; 141(2):89-97. PubMed ID: 36472867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Occurrence and lung cancer probability of new solid nodules at incidence screening with low-dose CT: analysis of data from the randomised, controlled NELSON trial.
    Walter JE; Heuvelmans MA; de Jong PA; Vliegenthart R; van Ooijen PMA; Peters RB; Ten Haaf K; Yousaf-Khan U; van der Aalst CM; de Bock GH; Mali W; Groen HJM; de Koning HJ; Oudkerk M
    Lancet Oncol; 2016 Jul; 17(7):907-916. PubMed ID: 27283862
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Value of a deep learning-based algorithm for detecting Lung-RADS category 4 nodules on chest radiographs in a health checkup population: estimation of the sample size for a randomized controlled trial.
    Nam JG; Kim HJ; Lee EH; Hong W; Park J; Hwang EJ; Park CM; Goo JM
    Eur Radiol; 2022 Jan; 32(1):213-222. PubMed ID: 34264351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Influence of lung nodule margin on volume- and diameter-based reader variability in CT lung cancer screening.
    Han D; Heuvelmans MA; Vliegenthart R; Rook M; Dorrius MD; de Jonge GJ; Walter JE; van Ooijen PMA; de Koning HJ; Oudkerk M
    Br J Radiol; 2018 Oct; 91(1090):20170405. PubMed ID: 28972803
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Solid, part-solid, or non-solid?: classification of pulmonary nodules in low-dose chest computed tomography by a computer-aided diagnosis system.
    Jacobs C; van Rikxoort EM; Scholten ET; de Jong PA; Prokop M; Schaefer-Prokop C; van Ginneken B
    Invest Radiol; 2015 Mar; 50(3):168-73. PubMed ID: 25478740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Impact of the COVID-19 Pandemic on Lung Cancer Screening Program and Subsequent Lung Cancer.
    Van Haren RM; Delman AM; Turner KM; Waits B; Hemingway M; Shah SA; Starnes SL
    J Am Coll Surg; 2021 Apr; 232(4):600-605. PubMed ID: 33346080
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Lung CT Screening Reporting and Data System Speed and Accuracy Are Increased With the Use of a Semiautomated Computer Application.
    Clark TJ; Flood TF; Maximin ST; Sachs PB
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2015 Dec; 12(12 Pt A):1301-6. PubMed ID: 26507823
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. JOURNAL CLUB: Computer-Aided Detection of Lung Nodules on CT With a Computerized Pulmonary Vessel Suppressed Function.
    Lo SB; Freedman MT; Gillis LB; White CS; Mun SK
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2018 Mar; 210(3):480-488. PubMed ID: 29336601
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Cancer Risk in Nodules Detected at Follow-Up Lung Cancer Screening CT.
    Hammer MM; Byrne SC
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 Apr; 218(4):634-641. PubMed ID: 34755524
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Lung nodule detection performance in five observers on computed tomography (CT) with adaptive iterative dose reduction using three-dimensional processing (AIDR 3D) in a Japanese multicenter study: Comparison between ultra-low-dose CT and low-dose CT by receiver-operating characteristic analysis.
    Nagatani Y; Takahashi M; Murata K; Ikeda M; Yamashiro T; Miyara T; Koyama H; Koyama M; Sato Y; Moriya H; Noma S; Tomiyama N; Ohno Y; Murayama S;
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Jul; 84(7):1401-12. PubMed ID: 25892051
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Application of Lung-Screening Reporting and Data System Versus Pan-Canadian Early Detection of Lung Cancer Nodule Risk Calculation in the Alberta Lung Cancer Screening Study.
    Tremblay A; Taghizadeh N; MacGregor JH; Armstrong G; Bristow MS; Guo LLQ; Lydell C; Pereira R; Lee A; Elliot T; MacEachern P; Graham A; Dickinson JA; Koetzler R; Lam SC; Yang H; Bédard EL; Tammemagi M; Burrowes P
    J Am Coll Radiol; 2019 Oct; 16(10):1425-1432. PubMed ID: 31103442
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.