64 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33123827)
1. DXA-based statistical models of shape and intensity outperform aBMD hip fracture prediction: A retrospective study.
Aldieri A; Paggiosi M; Eastell R; Bignardi C; Audenino AL; Bhattacharya P; Terzini M
Bone; 2024 May; 182():117051. PubMed ID: 38382701
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. A new hip fracture risk index derived from FEA-computed proximal femur fracture loads and energies-to-failure.
Cao X; Keyak JH; Sigurdsson S; Zhao C; Zhou W; Liu A; Lang TF; Deng HW; Gudnason V; Sha Q
Osteoporos Int; 2024 May; 35(5):785-794. PubMed ID: 38246971
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Diabetes is associated with a lower minimum moment of inertia among older women: An analysis of 3D reconstructions of clinical CT scans.
Heckelman LN; Wesorick BR; DeFrate LE; Lee RH
J Biomech; 2021 Nov; 128():110707. PubMed ID: 34488049
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Subregional statistical shape modelling identifies lesser trochanter size as a possible risk factor for radiographic hip osteoarthritis, a cross-sectional analysis from the Osteoporotic Fractures in Men Study.
Faber BG; Bredbenner TL; Baird D; Gregory J; Saunders F; Giuraniuc CV; Aspden RM; Lane NE; Orwoll E; Tobias JH;
Osteoarthritis Cartilage; 2020 Aug; 28(8):1071-1078. PubMed ID: 32387760
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fusion of clinical and stochastic finite element data for hip fracture risk prediction.
Jiang P; Missoum S; Chen Z
J Biomech; 2015 Nov; 48(15):4043-4052. PubMed ID: 26482733
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Patient-specific finite element analysis for assessing hip fracture risk in aging populations.
K N C; Schmidt Genannt Waldschmidt N; Corda JV; Shenoy B S; Shetty S; Keni LG; Bhat N S; Nikam N; Mihcin S
Biomed Phys Eng Express; 2024 Mar; 10(3):. PubMed ID: 38437729
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Can patient-specific finite element models better predict fractures in metastatic bone disease than experienced clinicians?: Towards computational modelling in daily clinical practice.
Eggermont F; Derikx LC; Verdonschot N; van der Geest ICM; de Jong MAA; Snyers A; van der Linden YM; Tanck E
Bone Joint Res; 2018 Jun; 7(6):430-439. PubMed ID: 30034797
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. CT and MRI Assessment and Characterization Using Segmentation and 3D Modeling Techniques: Applications to Muscle, Bone and Brain.
Gargiulo P; Helgason T; Ramon C; Jónsson H; Carraro U
Eur J Transl Myol; 2014 Mar; 24(1):3298. PubMed ID: 26913129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Application of statistical shape modeling to the human hip joint: a scoping review.
Johnson LG; Bortolussi-Courval S; Chehil A; Schaeffer EK; Pawliuk C; Wilson DR; Mulpuri K
JBI Evid Synth; 2023 Mar; 21(3):533-583. PubMed ID: 36705052
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Risk modeling of femoral neck fracture based on geometric parameters of the proximal epiphysis.
Shitova AD; Kovaleva ON; Olsufieva AV; Gadzhimuradova IA; Zubkov DD; Kniazev MO; Zharikova TS; Zharikov YO
World J Orthop; 2022 Aug; 13(8):733-743. PubMed ID: 36159625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. [Three-dimensional morphological study of the effect of false acetabulum on the femoral structure in Crowe type
Liao W; Yang Y; Liao L; Ma Y; Zheng Q
Zhongguo Xiu Fu Chong Jian Wai Ke Za Zhi; 2022 Jun; 36(6):714-721. PubMed ID: 35712929
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Improving the Hip Fracture Risk Prediction with a Statistical Shape-and-Intensity Model of the Proximal Femur.
Aldieri A; Bhattacharya P; Paggiosi M; Eastell R; Audenino AL; Bignardi C; Morbiducci U; Terzini M
Ann Biomed Eng; 2022 Feb; 50(2):211-221. PubMed ID: 35044572
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Finite Element Assessment of Bone Fragility from Clinical Images.
Schileo E; Taddei F
Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2021 Dec; 19(6):688-698. PubMed ID: 34931294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Statistical Shape and Appearance Models: Development Towards Improved Osteoporosis Care.
Grassi L; Väänänen SP; Isaksson H
Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2021 Dec; 19(6):676-687. PubMed ID: 34773211
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. 3D Analysis of the Proximal Femur Compared to 2D Analysis for Hip Fracture Risk Prediction in a Clinical Population.
Jazinizadeh F; Quenneville CE
Ann Biomed Eng; 2021 Apr; 49(4):1222-1232. PubMed ID: 33123827
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Generation of 3D shape, density, cortical thickness and finite element mesh of proximal femur from a DXA image.
Väänänen SP; Grassi L; Flivik G; Jurvelin JS; Isaksson H
Med Image Anal; 2015 Aug; 24(1):125-134. PubMed ID: 26148575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Validation of 3D finite element models from simulated DXA images for biofidelic simulations of sideways fall impact to the hip.
Grassi L; Fleps I; Sahlstedt H; Väänänen SP; Ferguson SJ; Isaksson H; Helgason B
Bone; 2021 Jan; 142():115678. PubMed ID: 33022451
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Advanced 2D image processing technique to predict hip fracture risk in an older population based on single DXA scans.
Jazinizadeh F; Adachi JD; Quenneville CE
Osteoporos Int; 2020 Oct; 31(10):1925-1933. PubMed ID: 32415372
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Are CT-Based Finite Element Model Predictions of Femoral Bone Strength Clinically Useful?
Viceconti M; Qasim M; Bhattacharya P; Li X
Curr Osteoporos Rep; 2018 Jun; 16(3):216-223. PubMed ID: 29656377
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20.
; ; . PubMed ID:
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
