These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

150 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33124715)

  • 1. Improving predictive capacity of the Amino acid Derivative Reactivity Assay test method for skin sensitization potential with an optimal molar concentration of test chemical solution.
    Imamura M; Wanibuchi S; Yamamoto Y; Kojima H; Ono A; Kasahara T; Fujita M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2021 Feb; 41(2):303-329. PubMed ID: 33124715
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Expanding the applicability of the amino acid derivative reactivity assay: Determining a weight for preparation of test chemical solutions that yield a predictive capacity identical to the conventional method using molar concentration and demonstrating the capacity to detect sensitizers in liquid mixtures.
    Yamamoto Y; Fujita M; Wanibuchi S; Katsuoka Y; Ono A; Kasahara T
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2019; 97():67-79. PubMed ID: 30796999
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Applicability of amino acid derivative reactivity assay (4 mM) for the prediction of skin sensitization by combining multiple alternative methods to evaluate key events.
    Imamura M; Yamamoto Y; Fujita M; Wanibuchi S; Nakashima N; Kojima H; Ono A; Kasahara T
    J Appl Toxicol; 2022 Jul; 42(7):1159-1167. PubMed ID: 34993977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The within- and between-laboratories reproducibility and predictive capacity of Amino acid Derivative Reactivity Assay using 4 mM test chemical solution: Results of ring study implemented at five participating laboratories.
    Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Wanibuchi S; Watanabe S; Yamaga H; Wakabayashi K; Tahara Y; Horie N; Fujimoto K; Takeuchi K; Kamiya K; Kawakami T; Kojima K; Sozu T; Kojima H; Kasahara T; Ono A
    J Appl Toxicol; 2022 Feb; 42(2):318-333. PubMed ID: 34855227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Precipitation of test chemicals in reaction solutions used in the amino acid derivative reactivity assay and the direct peptide reactivity assay.
    Yamamoto Y; Wanibuchi S; Sato A; Kasahara T; Fujita M
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2019; 100():106624. PubMed ID: 31445998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Cause of and countermeasures for oxidation of the cysteine-derived reagent used in the amino acid derivative reactivity assay.
    Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Watanabe S; Sugawara T; Wakabayashi K; Tahara Y; Horie N; Fujimoto K; Kusakari K; Kurokawa Y; Kawakami T; Kojima K; Kojima H; Ono A; Katsuoka Y; Tanabe H; Yokoyama H; Kasahara T
    J Appl Toxicol; 2019 Feb; 39(2):191-208. PubMed ID: 30221369
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. The within- and between-laboratory reproducibility and predictive capacity of the in chemico amino acid derivative reactivity assay: Results of validation study implemented in four participating laboratories.
    Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Watanabe S; Sugawara T; Wakabayashi K; Tahara Y; Horie N; Fujimoto K; Kusakari K; Kurokawa Y; Kawakami T; Kojima K; Sozu T; Nakayama T; Kusao T; Richmond J; Nicole K; Kim BH; Kojima H; Kasahara T; Ono A
    J Appl Toxicol; 2019 Nov; 39(11):1492-1505. PubMed ID: 31313332
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Amino acid derivative reactivity assay-organic solvent reaction system: A novel alternative test for skin sensitization capable of assessing highly hydrophobic substances.
    Yamaga H; Watanabe S; Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Kasahara T; Kataoka S
    J Appl Toxicol; 2021 Oct; 41(10):1634-1648. PubMed ID: 33636015
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of in chemico skin sensitization methods and development of an in chemico skin photosensitization assay.
    Patel NH; Mishra PK; Nagane R; Deshpande A; Tamboli IY; Date R
    ALTEX; 2019; 36(3):373-387. PubMed ID: 30865783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The amino acid derivative reactivity assay with fluorescence detection and its application to multi-constituent substances.
    Wanibuchi S; Yamamoto Y; Sato A; Kasahara T; Fujita M
    J Toxicol Sci; 2019; 44(12):821-832. PubMed ID: 31813901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. A novel in chemico method to detect skin sensitizers in highly diluted reaction conditions.
    Yamamoto Y; Tahara H; Usami R; Kasahara T; Jimbo Y; Hioki T; Fujita M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2015 Nov; 35(11):1348-60. PubMed ID: 25809859
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Development of a prediction method for skin sensitization using novel cysteine and lysine derivatives.
    Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Tahara H; Kasahara T; Jimbo Y; Hioki T
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2014; 70(1):94-105. PubMed ID: 24928155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A newly developed means of HPLC-fluorescence analysis for predicting the skin sensitization potential of multi-constituent substances using ADRA.
    Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Wanibuchi S; Katsuoka Y; Kasahara T
    Toxicol In Vitro; 2019 Sep; 59():161-178. PubMed ID: 31002975
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. The underlying factors that explain why nucleophilic reagents rarely co-elute with test chemicals in the ADRA.
    Fujita M; Yamamoto Y; Wanibuchi S; Katsuoka Y; Kasahara T
    J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2019; 96():95-105. PubMed ID: 30776483
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Applicability of amino acid derivative reactivity assay for prediction of skin sensitization by combining multiple alternative methods to evaluate key events.
    Yamamoto Y; Fujita M; Wanibuchi S; Sato A; Akimoto M; Katsuoka Y; Ono A; Kasahara T
    J Toxicol Sci; 2019; 44(9):585-600. PubMed ID: 31474740
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Within- and between-laboratory reproducibility and predictive capacity of amino acid derivative reactivity assay (ADRA) using a 0.5 mg/mL test chemical solution: Results of the study for reproducibility confirmation implemented in five participating laboratories.
    Yamamoto Y; Fujita M; Watanabe S; Yamaga H; Wakabayashi K; Tahara Y; Horie N; Fujimoto K; Takeuchi K; Kamiya K; Kawakami T; Kojima K; Sozu T; Kojima H; Kasahara T; Ono A
    J Appl Toxicol; 2022 Jun; 42(6):1078-1090. PubMed ID: 35043433
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessment of commercial polymers with and without reactive groups using amino acid derivative reactivity assay based on both molar concentration approach and gravimetric approach.
    Fujita M; Nakashima N; Wanibuchi S; Yamamoto Y; Kojima H; Ono A; Kasahara T
    J Appl Toxicol; 2023 Mar; 43(3):446-457. PubMed ID: 36101970
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Oxidation of a cysteine-derived nucleophilic reagent by dimethyl sulfoxide in the amino acid derivative reactivity assay.
    Akimoto M; Yamamoto Y; Watanabe S; Yamaga H; Yoshida K; Wakabayashi K; Tahara Y; Horie N; Fujimoto K; Kusakari K; Kamiya K; Kojima K; Kawakami T; Kojima H; Ono A; Kasahara T; Fujita M
    J Appl Toxicol; 2020 Jun; 40(6):843-854. PubMed ID: 32052484
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Theoretical Validation of
    Fujimoto K; Higaki T; Abe J; Fujita M; Kawakami T
    Chem Res Toxicol; 2022 Nov; 35(11):2107-2121. PubMed ID: 36315617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [In chemico skin sensitization alternative method: development of ADRA and listing to OECD test guideline].
    Kasahara T; Fujita M
    Nihon Yakurigaku Zasshi; 2022; 157(5):345-350. PubMed ID: 36047150
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.