These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
146 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33124715)
41. Skin sensitization quantitative QSAR models based on mechanistic structural alerts. Chayawan ; Selvestrel G; Baderna D; Toma C; Caballero Alfonso AY; Gamba A; Benfenati E Toxicology; 2022 Feb; 468():153111. PubMed ID: 35093427 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. A convenient fluorometric test method for skin sensitization using glutathione Kim GH; Cha DH; Nepal MR; Jeong TC J Toxicol Environ Health A; 2021 Oct; 84(19):783-799. PubMed ID: 34196263 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
43. In chemico assessment of potential sensitizers: Stability and direct peptide reactivity of 24 fragrance ingredients. Avonto C; Wang YH; Chittiboyina AG; Vukmanovic S; Khan IA J Appl Toxicol; 2019 Feb; 39(2):398-408. PubMed ID: 30325045 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Mechanistic assessment of peptide reactivity assay to predict skin allergens with Kathon CG isothiazolinones. Mutschler J; Giménez-Arnau E; Foertsch L; Gerberick GF; Lepoittevin JP Toxicol In Vitro; 2009 Apr; 23(3):439-46. PubMed ID: 19444925 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. Rapid and simple kinetics screening assay for electrophilic dermal sensitizers using nitrobenzenethiol. Chipinda I; Ajibola RO; Morakinyo MK; Ruwona TB; Simoyi RH; Siegel PD Chem Res Toxicol; 2010 May; 23(5):918-25. PubMed ID: 20402462 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Pre-validation study of spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) as a modified Seo JA; Cho SA; Park CE; Seo DH; Choi M; An S; Kim BH Toxicol Res; 2022 Oct; 38(4):531-544. PubMed ID: 36277359 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. A review of substances found positive in 1 of 3 in vitro tests for skin sensitization. Kolle SN; Natsch A; Gerberick GF; Landsiedel R Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Aug; 106():352-368. PubMed ID: 31112722 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. The modified IL-8 Luc assay, an in vitro skin sensitisation test, can significantly improve the false-negative judgment of lipophilic sensitizers with logK Kimura Y; Fujimura C; Aiba S Arch Toxicol; 2021 Feb; 95(2):749-758. PubMed ID: 33068120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
49. Prediction of skin sensitization potency using machine learning approaches. Zang Q; Paris M; Lehmann DM; Bell S; Kleinstreuer N; Allen D; Matheson J; Jacobs A; Casey W; Strickland J J Appl Toxicol; 2017 Jul; 37(7):792-805. PubMed ID: 28074598 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
50. Binary test battery with KeratinoSens™ and h-CLAT as part of a bottom-up approach for skin sensitization hazard prediction. Otsubo Y; Nishijo T; Miyazawa M; Saito K; Mizumachi H; Sakaguchi H Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2017 Aug; 88():118-124. PubMed ID: 28602621 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Peptide reactivity assays for skin sensitisation - scope and limitations. Roberts DW Crit Rev Toxicol; 2022 Jul; 52(6):420-430. PubMed ID: 36542542 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Prediction of skin sensitization potency sub-categories using peptide reactivity data. Wareing B; Urbisch D; Kolle SN; Honarvar N; Sauer UG; Mehling A; Landsiedel R Toxicol In Vitro; 2017 Dec; 45(Pt 1):134-145. PubMed ID: 28882705 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. High-throughput screening (HTS)-based spectrophotometric direct peptide reactivity assay (Spectro-DPRA) to predict human skin sensitization potential. Cho SA; An S; Park JH Toxicol Lett; 2019 Oct; 314():27-36. PubMed ID: 31295538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. The GARD assay for assessment of chemical skin sensitizers. Johansson H; Albrekt AS; Borrebaeck CA; Lindstedt M Toxicol In Vitro; 2013 Apr; 27(3):1163-9. PubMed ID: 23032079 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. REACH alternative testing strategy for skin sensitization in practice: Fact or fiction? Barentsen HM; Jonis SU; Pelgrom SMGJ; Rijk JCW; Westerink WMA; Paulussen JJC Regul Toxicol Pharmacol; 2019 Aug; 106():292-302. PubMed ID: 31112721 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. Skin sensitization, false positives and false negatives: experience with guinea pig assays. Basketter DA; Kimber I J Appl Toxicol; 2010 Jul; 30(5):381-6. PubMed ID: 20583317 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
58. A chemical dataset for evaluation of alternative approaches to skin-sensitization testing. Gerberick GF; Ryan CA; Kern PS; Dearman RJ; Kimber I; Patlewicz GY; Basketter DA Contact Dermatitis; 2004 May; 50(5):274-88. PubMed ID: 15209809 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. Investigation of surface plasmon resonance biosensor for skin sensitizers studies. Achilleos C; Tailhardat M; Courtellemont P; Varlet BL; Dupont D Toxicol In Vitro; 2009 Mar; 23(2):308-18. PubMed ID: 19073248 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
60. Application of BALB/c mouse in the local lymph node assay:BrdU-ELISA for the prediction of the skin sensitizing potential of chemicals. Hou F; Xing C; Li B; Cheng J; Chen W; Zhang M J Pharmacol Toxicol Methods; 2015; 72():53-8. PubMed ID: 25600862 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]