141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33124739)
21. SD + SV4 diagnosis of left ventricular hypertrophy, a revaluation of ECG criterion by cardiac magnetic resonance imaging.
Liu D; Su H; Wu B; Zhu D; Gu G; Xie D; Cui W
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2021 Jul; 26(4):e12832. PubMed ID: 33620147
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Myocardial deformation imaging by two-dimensional speckle-tracking echocardiography for prediction of global and segmental functional changes after acute myocardial infarction: a comparison with late gadolinium enhancement cardiac magnetic resonance.
Altiok E; Tiemann S; Becker M; Koos R; Zwicker C; Schroeder J; Kraemer N; Schoth F; Adam D; Friedman Z; Marx N; Hoffmann R
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2014 Mar; 27(3):249-57. PubMed ID: 24368027
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Diagnostic Capability and Influence Factors for a New Electrocardiogram Criterion in the Diagnosis of Left Ventricular Hypertrophy in a Chinese Population.
Xia Y; Li X; Zhang H; Liu L; Fu L; Yan W; Li Q; Zhang Y; Yu M; Liu J; Fang P
Cardiology; 2020; 145(5):294-302. PubMed ID: 32289773
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Impact of hypertension on postreperfusion left ventricular recovery in patients with ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction and multivessel coronary artery disease.
Vaicekavičius E; Vasiliauskas D; Navickas R; Milvidaitė I; Unikas R; Venclovienė J; Kubilius R
Medicina (Kaunas); 2015; 51(1):38-45. PubMed ID: 25744774
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. No association between scar size and characteristics on T-wave Alternans in post-myocardial infarction patients with relatively preserved ventricular function presented with nonsustained ventricular tachycardia.
Yalın K; Gölcük E; Teker E; Yılmaz R; Dursun M; Bilge AK; Adalet K
Anadolu Kardiyol Derg; 2014 Aug; 14(5):442-7. PubMed ID: 24901022
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Comparative value of ECG-gated blood pool SPET and ECG-gated myocardial perfusion SPET in the assessment of global systolic left ventricular function.
Daou D; Vilain D; Colin P; Lebtahi R; Fourme T; Coaguila C; Benada A; Idy-Peretti I; Slama M; Le Guludec D
Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging; 2003 Jun; 30(6):859-67. PubMed ID: 12677300
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Detection of Left Ventricular Thrombus by Cardiac Magnetic Resonance in Embolic Stroke of Undetermined Source.
Takasugi J; Yamagami H; Noguchi T; Morita Y; Tanaka T; Okuno Y; Yasuda S; Toyoda K; Gon Y; Todo K; Sakaguchi M; Nagatsuka K
Stroke; 2017 Sep; 48(9):2434-2440. PubMed ID: 28818863
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. [Clinical value of left ventricular strain analysis by cardiovascular magnetic resonance in patients with coronary chronic total occlusion].
Zhang LJ; Tian JF; Yang XY; Xu L; He Y; Song XT
Zhonghua Xin Xue Guan Bing Za Zhi; 2021 Jun; 49(6):601-609. PubMed ID: 34126728
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
29. Predicting chronic left ventricular dysfunction 90 days after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: An Assessment of Pexelizumab in Acute Myocardial Infarction (APEX-AMI) Substudy.
Ezekowitz JA; Armstrong PW; Granger CB; Theroux P; Stebbins A; Kim RJ; Patel MR
Am Heart J; 2010 Aug; 160(2):272-8. PubMed ID: 20691832
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Prevalence of left ventricular systolic dysfunction in pre-dialysis and dialysis patients with preserved left ventricular ejection fraction.
Hensen LCR; Goossens K; Delgado V; Abou R; Rotmans JI; Jukema JW; Bax JJ
Eur J Heart Fail; 2018 Mar; 20(3):560-568. PubMed ID: 29164753
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Microvolt T-wave alternans and autonomic nervous system parameters can be helpful in the identification of low-arrhythmic risk patients with ischemic left ventricular systolic dysfunction.
Daniłowicz-Szymanowicz L; Kaufmann D; Rozwadowska K; Kempa M; Lewicka E; Raczak G
PLoS One; 2018; 13(5):e0196812. PubMed ID: 29723261
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Agreement of 2D transthoracic echocardiography with cardiovascular magnetic resonance imaging after ST-elevation myocardial infarction.
Hendriks T; Al Ali L; Maagdenberg CG; van Melle JP; Hummel YM; Oudkerk M; van Veldhuisen DJ; Nijveldt R; van der Horst ICC; Lipsic E; van der Harst P
Eur J Radiol; 2019 May; 114():6-13. PubMed ID: 31005178
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Deformation Analysis of Myocardial Layers Detects Early Cardiac Dysfunction after Chemotherapy in Bone Marrow Transplantation Patients: A Continuous and Additive Cardiotoxicity Process.
Paraskevaidis IA; Makavos G; Tsirigotis P; Psarogiannakopoulos P; Parissis J; Gkirkas K; Pessach I; Ikonomidis I
J Am Soc Echocardiogr; 2017 Nov; 30(11):1091-1102. PubMed ID: 28864152
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. How are ECG parameters related to cardiac magnetic resonance images? Electrocardiographic predictors of left ventricular hypertrophy and myocardial fibrosis in hypertrophic cardiomyopathy.
Dohy Z; Vereckei A; Horvath V; Czimbalmos C; Szabo L; Toth A; Suhai FI; Csecs I; Becker D; Merkely B; Vago H
Ann Noninvasive Electrocardiol; 2020 Sep; 25(5):e12763. PubMed ID: 32329134
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Evolution of QRS duration after myocardial infarction: clinical consequences.
Brembilla-Perrot B; Houriez P; Claudon O; Preiss JP; de la Chaise AT
Pacing Clin Electrophysiol; 1999 Oct; 22(10):1466-75. PubMed ID: 10588148
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Usefulness of traditional echocardiographic parameters in assessment of left ventricular function in patients with normal ejection fraction early after acute myocardial infarction: results from a large consecutive cohort.
Baron T; Flachskampf FA; Johansson K; Hedin EM; Christersson C
Eur Heart J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2016 Apr; 17(4):413-20. PubMed ID: 26139362
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Sub-acute cardiac magnetic resonance to predict irreversible reduction in left ventricular ejection fraction after ST-segment elevation myocardial infarction: A DANAMI-3 sub-study.
Alzuhairi KS; Lønborg J; Ahtarovski KA; Nepper-Christensen L; Kyhl K; Lassen JF; Sørensen R; Joshi F; Ghotbi AA; Schoos M; Goransson C; Bertelsen L; Helqvist S; Holmvang L; Jørgensen E; Pedersen F; Tilsted HH; Høfsten D; Køber L; Kelbæk H; Vejlstrup N; Engstrøm T
Int J Cardiol; 2020 Feb; 301():215-219. PubMed ID: 31748187
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Low lead one ratio predicts clinical outcomes in left bundle branch block.
Loring Z; Atwater BD; Xia X; Axelsson J; Klem I; Nijveldt R; Schelbert EB; Couderc JP; Strauss DG; Ugander M; Wieslander B
J Cardiovasc Electrophysiol; 2019 May; 30(5):709-716. PubMed ID: 30740823
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Positron emission tomography for the assessment of myocardial viability: an evidence-based analysis.
Medical Advisory Secretariat
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser; 2005; 5(16):1-167. PubMed ID: 23074467
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Ejection Fraction by Echocardiography for a Selective Use of Magnetic Resonance After Infarction.
Marcos-Garces V; Gavara J; Lopez-Lereu MP; Monmeneu JV; Rios-Navarro C; de Dios E; Perez N; Cànoves J; Gonzalez J; Minana G; Nunez J; de la Espriella R; Santas E; Moratal D; Chorro FJ; Valente F; Lorenzatti D; Rodríguez-Palomares JF; Ortiz-Pérez JT; Bodi V
Circ Cardiovasc Imaging; 2020 Dec; 13(12):e011491. PubMed ID: 33297764
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]