These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

191 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33125441)

  • 21. Biomechanical performance of Ti-PEEK dental implants in bone: An in-silico analysis.
    Ouldyerou A; Merdji A; Aminallah L; Roy S; Mehboob H; Özcan M
    J Mech Behav Biomed Mater; 2022 Oct; 134():105422. PubMed ID: 36037710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Biomechanics of Different Types of PEEK as Implant Materials for Implant-Retained Mandibular Overdentures.
    Hassan NA; Elkhadem AH; Elkerdawy MW; Osman RB
    Eur J Prosthodont Restor Dent; 2022 May; 30(2):113-120. PubMed ID: 34304396
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Influence of Alveolar Bone Loss and Different Alloys on the Biomechanical Behavior of Internal-and External-Connection Implants: A Three-Dimensional Finite Element Analysis.
    Tsouknidas A; Lympoudi E; Michalakis K; Giannopoulos D; Michailidis N; Pissiotis A; Fytanidis D; Kugiumtzis D
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2015; 30(3):e30-42. PubMed ID: 26009924
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Evaluation of the effect of an offset implant configuration in the posterior maxilla with external hexagon implant platform: A 3-dimensional finite element analysis.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DAF; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CAA; Pellizzer EP
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 Sep; 118(3):363-371. PubMed ID: 28222876
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Combining Intraoral and Face Scans for the Design and Fabrication of Computer-Assisted Design/Computer-Assisted Manufacturing (CAD/CAM) Polyether-Ether-Ketone (PEEK) Implant-Supported Bars for Maxillary Overdentures.
    Mangano F; Mangano C; Margiani B; Admakin O
    Scanning; 2019; 2019():4274715. PubMed ID: 31531155
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Finite element analysis of implant-supported prosthesis with pontic and cantilever in the posterior maxilla.
    de Souza Batista VE; Verri FR; Almeida DA; Santiago Junior JF; Lemos CA; Pellizzer EP
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2017 May; 20(6):663-670. PubMed ID: 28349769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. A photoelastic and strain gauge comparison of two attachments for obturator prostheses.
    Goiato MC; Matheus HR; de Medeiros RA; Dos Santos DM; Bitencourt SB; Pesqueira AA
    J Prosthet Dent; 2017 May; 117(5):685-689. PubMed ID: 27881311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Biomechanical investigation of maxillary implant-supported full-arch prostheses produced with different framework materials: a finite elements study.
    Topcu Ersöz MB; Mumcu E
    J Adv Prosthodont; 2022 Dec; 14(6):346-359. PubMed ID: 36685790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Assessment of stress/strain in dental implants and abutments of alternative materials compared to conventional titanium alloy-3D non-linear finite element analysis.
    Tretto PHW; Dos Santos MBF; Spazzin AO; Pereira GKR; Bacchi A
    Comput Methods Biomech Biomed Engin; 2020 Jun; 23(8):372-383. PubMed ID: 32116034
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses, part II: photoelastic imaging.
    Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; da Silva EV; Haddad MF; Moreno A; Zahoui A; dos Santos DM
    J Biomed Opt; 2014 Jun; 19(6):066012. PubMed ID: 24972360
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Biomechanical analysis of inclined and cantilever design with different implant framework materials in mandibular complete-arch implant restorations.
    Yu W; Li X; Ma X; Xu X
    J Prosthet Dent; 2022 May; 127(5):783.e1-783.e10. PubMed ID: 35305832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Stress analysis in oral obturator prostheses: imaging photoelastic.
    Pesqueira AA; Goiato MC; dos Santos DM; Haddad MF; Andreotti AM; Moreno A
    J Biomed Opt; 2013 Jun; 18(6):061203. PubMed ID: 23143194
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Impact of dental and zygomatic implants on stress distribution in maxillary defects: a 3-dimensional finite element analysis study.
    Korkmaz FM; Korkmaz YT; Yaluğ S; Korkmaz T
    J Oral Implantol; 2012 Oct; 38(5):557-67. PubMed ID: 20925533
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Comparison of Stress Distribution Among Standard Dental Implants Placed in Grafted Bone, Zygomatic Implants, and Subperiosteal Implants in the Atrophic Edentulous Maxilla: 3D Finite Element Analysis.
    Keleş HG; Karaca Ç
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):347-356. PubMed ID: 37083910
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Stress distribution in bone around an implant-supported three-unit fixed dental prosthesis using two different computer-aided designing/computer-aided milling provisional crown materials: Milled polymethylmethacrylate and milled polyetheretherketone - A finite element analysis.
    Barua SL; Poduval TS; Rani S; Jain N; Thakur S
    Dent Res J (Isfahan); 2023; 20():33. PubMed ID: 37180686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Stress behavior of an anterior single implant restored with high-performance polymer abutments under immediate and delayed loading: A 3D FEA study.
    Diken Turksayar AA; Donmez MB
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Feb; 32(2):132-138. PubMed ID: 36007157
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Does a PEEK Femoral TKA Implant Preserve Intact Femoral Surface Strains Compared With CoCr? A Preliminary Laboratory Study.
    Rankin KE; Dickinson AS; Briscoe A; Browne M
    Clin Orthop Relat Res; 2016 Nov; 474(11):2405-2413. PubMed ID: 27020431
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Biomechanical effects of different materials for an occlusal device on implant-supported rehabilitation in a tooth clenching situation. A 3D finite element analysis.
    Andrade CS; de Abreu Costa L; Menechelli LG; Lemos CAA; Okamoto R; Verri FR; de Souza Batista VE
    J Prosthodont; 2023 Sep; ():. PubMed ID: 37675950
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Photoelastic stress analysis of different attachment systems on implant-retained and conventional palatal obturator prostheses.
    do Prado Ribeiro P; Goiato MC; Pellizzer EP; Pesqueira AA; Haddad MF; Alves-Rezende MC; dos Santos DM
    J Craniofac Surg; 2011 Mar; 22(2):523-6. PubMed ID: 21403545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. [Three-dimensional finite element analysis of four-implants supported mandibular overdentures using two different attachments].
    Jiang MY; Wen J; Xu SS; Liu TS; Sun HQ
    Zhonghua Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2019 Jan; 54(1):41-45. PubMed ID: 30630258
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.