These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

149 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33125555)

  • 1. Architecture distortion score (ADS) in malignancy risk stratification of architecture distortion on contrast-enhanced digital mammography.
    Goh Y; Chan CW; Pillay P; Lee HS; Pan HB; Hung BH; Quek ST; Chou CP
    Eur Radiol; 2021 May; 31(5):2657-2666. PubMed ID: 33125555
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Clinical evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast enhanced tomosynthesis--Comparison to contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
    Chou CP; Lewin JM; Chiang CL; Hung BH; Yang TL; Huang JS; Liao JB; Pan HB
    Eur J Radiol; 2015 Dec; 84(12):2501-8. PubMed ID: 26456307
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Digital breast tomosynthesis and contrast-enhanced dual-energy digital mammography alone and in combination compared to 2D digital synthetized mammography and MR imaging in breast cancer detection and classification.
    Petrillo A; Fusco R; Vallone P; Filice S; Granata V; Petrosino T; Rosaria Rubulotta M; Setola SV; Mattace Raso M; Maio F; Raiano C; Siani C; Di Bonito M; Botti G
    Breast J; 2020 May; 26(5):860-872. PubMed ID: 31886607
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Detection of mammographically occult architectural distortion on digital breast tomosynthesis screening: initial clinical experience.
    Partyka L; Lourenco AP; Mainiero MB
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2014 Jul; 203(1):216-22. PubMed ID: 24951218
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Impact of background parenchymal enhancement levels on the diagnosis of contrast-enhanced digital mammography in evaluations of breast cancer: comparison with contrast-enhanced breast MRI.
    Yuen S; Monzawa S; Gose A; Yanai S; Yata Y; Matsumoto H; Ichinose Y; Tashiro T; Yamagami K
    Breast Cancer; 2022 Jul; 29(4):677-687. PubMed ID: 35220511
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Which clinical, radiological, histological, and molecular parameters are associated with the absence of enhancement of known breast cancers with Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM)?
    Bicchierai G; Amato F; Vanzi B; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Di Naro F; Bianchi S; Cirone D; Cozzi D; Miele V; Nori J
    Breast; 2020 Dec; 54():15-24. PubMed ID: 32889303
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Preoperative loco-regional staging of invasive lobular carcinoma with contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM).
    Amato F; Bicchierai G; Cirone D; Depretto C; Di Naro F; Vanzi E; Scaperrotta G; Bartolotta TV; Miele V; Nori J
    Radiol Med; 2019 Dec; 124(12):1229-1237. PubMed ID: 31773458
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography Screening for Intermediate-Risk Women With a History of Lobular Neoplasia.
    Hogan MP; Amir T; Sevilimedu V; Sung J; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Jun; 216(6):1486-1491. PubMed ID: 33787291
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comparison of False-Positive Versus True-Positive Findings on Contrast-Enhanced Digital Mammography.
    Amir T; Hogan MP; Jacobs S; Sevilimedu V; Sung J; Jochelson MS
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2022 May; 218(5):797-808. PubMed ID: 34817195
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Contrast Enhanced Digital Mammography (CEDM) Helps to Safely Reduce Benign Breast Biopsies for Low to Moderately Suspicious Soft Tissue Lesions.
    Zuley ML; Bandos AI; Abrams GS; Ganott MA; Gizienski TA; Hakim CM; Kelly AE; Nair BE; Sumkin JH; Waheed U; Gur D
    Acad Radiol; 2020 Jul; 27(7):969-976. PubMed ID: 31495761
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Malignant Outcomes of Architectural Distortion on Tomosynthesis: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.
    Choudhery S; Johnson MP; Larson NB; Anderson T
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2021 Aug; 217(2):295-303. PubMed ID: 32966111
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comparison of contrast-enhanced digital mammography and contrast-enhanced digital breast tomosynthesis for lesion assessment.
    Huang H; Scaduto DA; Liu C; Yang J; Zhu C; Rinaldi K; Eisenberg J; Liu J; Hoernig M; Wicklein J; Vogt S; Mertelmeier T; Fisher PR; Zhao W
    J Med Imaging (Bellingham); 2019 Jul; 6(3):031407. PubMed ID: 30766895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Dual-energy contrast-enhanced digital mammography: initial clinical results.
    Dromain C; Thibault F; Muller S; Rimareix F; Delaloge S; Tardivon A; Balleyguier C
    Eur Radiol; 2011 Mar; 21(3):565-74. PubMed ID: 20839001
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Evaluation of contrast-enhanced digital mammography (CEDM) in the preoperative staging of breast cancer: Large-scale single-center experience.
    Bicchierai G; Tonelli P; Piacenti A; De Benedetto D; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Bianchi S; Cirone D; Kaur Gill M; Miele V; Nori J
    Breast J; 2020 Jul; 26(7):1276-1283. PubMed ID: 31999029
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical utility of contrast-enhanced spectral mammography as an adjunct for tomosynthesis-detected architectural distortion.
    Patel BK; Naylor ME; Kosiorek HE; Lopez-Alvarez YM; Miller AM; Pizzitola VJ; Pockaj BA
    Clin Imaging; 2017; 46():44-52. PubMed ID: 28723585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Digital tomosynthesis spot view in architectural distortions: outcomes in management and radiation dose.
    Fiaschetti V; Ubaldi N; De Fazio S; Ricci A; Maspes F; Cossu E
    Radiol Med; 2023 Jan; 128(1):35-48. PubMed ID: 36534241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Contrast-enhanced mammography in the management of breast architectural distortions and avoidance of unnecessary biopsies.
    Bellini C; Pugliese F; Bicchierai G; Amato F; De Benedetto D; Di Naro F; Boeri C; Vanzi E; Migliaro G; Incardona L; Tommasi C; Orzalesi L; Miele V; Nori J
    Breast Cancer; 2024 Sep; 31(5):851-857. PubMed ID: 38811515
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Performance of Dual-Energy Contrast-enhanced Digital Mammography for Screening Women at Increased Risk of Breast Cancer.
    Sung JS; Lebron L; Keating D; D'Alessio D; Comstock CE; Lee CH; Pike MC; Ayhan M; Moskowitz CS; Morris EA; Jochelson MS
    Radiology; 2019 Oct; 293(1):81-88. PubMed ID: 31453765
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of digital mammography and digital breast tomosynthesis in the detection of architectural distortion.
    Dibble EH; Lourenco AP; Baird GL; Ward RC; Maynard AS; Mainiero MB
    Eur Radiol; 2018 Jan; 28(1):3-10. PubMed ID: 28710582
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Pathologic Outcomes in Single Versus Multiple Areas of Architectural Distortion on Digital Breast Tomosynthesis.
    Wang LC; Philip M; Bhole S; Rao S; Gupta D; Schacht D; Friedewald SM; Anders R
    AJR Am J Roentgenol; 2023 Jan; 220(1):50-62. PubMed ID: 35895298
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.