These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

182 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33126132)

  • 21. Multiple syntrophic interactions drive biohythane production from waste sludge in microbial electrolysis cells.
    Liu Q; Ren ZJ; Huang C; Liu B; Ren N; Xing D
    Biotechnol Biofuels; 2016; 9():162. PubMed ID: 27489567
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of soybean curd residue for methane production: Characterizing bacterial and methanogen communities and their correlations with organic loading rate and operating temperature.
    Zhang L; Loh KC; Sarvanantharajah S; Tong YW; Wang CH; Dai Y
    Bioresour Technol; 2019 Sep; 288():121597. PubMed ID: 31176202
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Enhanced biogas production from rice straw by selective micronutrients under solid state anaerobic digestion.
    Narra M; Balasubramanian V; Kurchania A; Pathak BS; Shyam M
    Bioresour Technol; 2016 Nov; 220():666-671. PubMed ID: 27638464
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Improved biogas production from rice straw by co-digestion with kitchen waste and pig manure.
    Ye J; Li D; Sun Y; Wang G; Yuan Z; Zhen F; Wang Y
    Waste Manag; 2013 Dec; 33(12):2653-8. PubMed ID: 23790673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Anaerobic co-digestion of Chinese cabbage waste and cow manure at mesophilic and thermophilic temperatures: Digestion performance, microbial community, and biogas slurry fertility.
    Liu Y; Wang T; Xing Z; Ma Y; Nan F; Pan L; Chen J
    Bioresour Technol; 2022 Nov; 363():127976. PubMed ID: 36122849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Effect of Substrate to Inoculum Ratio on Biogas Production and Microbial Community During Hemi-Solid-State Batch Anaerobic Co-digestion of Rape Straw and Dairy Manure.
    Ma X; Jiang T; Chang J; Tang Q; Luo T; Cui Z
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2019 Nov; 189(3):884-902. PubMed ID: 31140052
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Change to biogas production in solid-state anaerobic digestion using rice straw as substrates at different temperatures.
    Liu Y; Fang J; Tong X; Huan C; Ji G; Zeng Y; Xu L; Yan Z
    Bioresour Technol; 2019 Dec; 293():122066. PubMed ID: 31557641
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Anaerobic co-digestion of table olive debittering & washing effluent, cattle manure and pig manure in batch and high volume laboratory anaerobic digesters: effect of temperature.
    Zarkadas IS; Pilidis GA
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 Apr; 102(8):4995-5003. PubMed ID: 21334877
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Volume ratios between the thermophilic and the mesophilic digesters of a temperature-phased anaerobic digestion system affect their performance and microbial communities.
    Lv W; Zhang W; Yu Z
    N Biotechnol; 2016 Jan; 33(1):245-54. PubMed ID: 26232524
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Feasibility of dry anaerobic digestion of beer lees for methane production and biochar enhanced performance at mesophilic and thermophilic temperature.
    Sun C; Liu F; Song Z; Wang J; Li Y; Pan Y; Sheng T; Li L
    Bioresour Technol; 2019 Mar; 276():65-73. PubMed ID: 30611088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Methane yield enhancement of mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of algal biomass and food waste using algal biochar: Semi-continuous operation and microbial community analysis.
    Zhang L; Li F; Kuroki A; Loh KC; Wang CH; Dai Y; Tong YW
    Bioresour Technol; 2020 Apr; 302():122892. PubMed ID: 32028149
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Inactivation of enteric indicator bacteria and system stability during dry co-digestion of food waste and pig manure.
    Jiang Y; Dennehy C; Lawlor PG; Hu Z; Zhan X; Gardiner GE
    Sci Total Environ; 2018 Jan; 612():293-302. PubMed ID: 28850849
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Upflow anaerobic solid-state (UASS) digestion of horse manure: Thermophilic vs. mesophilic performance.
    Böske J; Wirth B; Garlipp F; Mumme J; Van den Weghe H
    Bioresour Technol; 2015 Jan; 175():8-16. PubMed ID: 25459798
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Conventional mesophilic vs. thermophilic anaerobic digestion: a trade-off between performance and stability?
    Labatut RA; Angenent LT; Scott NR
    Water Res; 2014 Apr; 53():249-58. PubMed ID: 24530545
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Effects of feedstock ratio and organic loading rate on the anaerobic mesophilic co-digestion of rice straw and cow manure.
    Li D; Liu S; Mi L; Li Z; Yuan Y; Yan Z; Liu X
    Bioresour Technol; 2015; 189():319-326. PubMed ID: 25909453
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Influence of feedstock-to-inoculum ratio on performance and microbial community succession during solid-state thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of pig urine and rice straw.
    Meng L; Xie L; Kinh CT; Suenaga T; Hori T; Riya S; Terada A; Hosomi M
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Mar; 252():127-133. PubMed ID: 29310016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Ammonia inhibition on hydrogen enriched anaerobic digestion of manure under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions.
    Wang H; Zhang Y; Angelidaki I
    Water Res; 2016 Nov; 105():314-319. PubMed ID: 27639056
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Co-production of biogas and humic acid using rice straw and pig manure as substrates through solid-state anaerobic fermentation and subsequent aerobic composting.
    Ji JL; Chen F; Liu S; Yang Y; Hou C; Wang YZ
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 320():115860. PubMed ID: 35961141
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Optimization of the thermophilic anaerobic co-digestion of pig manure, agriculture waste and inorganic additive through specific methanogenic activity.
    Jiménez J; Cisneros-Ortiz ME; Guardia-Puebla Y; Morgan-Sagastume JM; Noyola A
    Water Sci Technol; 2014; 69(12):2381-8. PubMed ID: 24959998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Effects of hydraulic retention time on biohythane production via single-stage anaerobic fermentation in a two-compartment bioreactor.
    Vo TP; Lay CH; Lin CY
    Bioresour Technol; 2019 Nov; 292():121869. PubMed ID: 31400653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.