These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33126132)

  • 41. Mesophilic versus thermophilic anaerobic digestion of cattle manure: methane productivity and microbial ecology.
    Moset V; Poulsen M; Wahid R; Højberg O; Møller HB
    Microb Biotechnol; 2015 Sep; 8(5):787-800. PubMed ID: 25737010
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Biohythane production from food waste in a two-stage process: assessing the energy recovery potential.
    Ghimire A; Luongo V; Frunzo L; Lens PNL; Pirozzi F; Esposito G
    Environ Technol; 2022 Jun; 43(14):2190-2196. PubMed ID: 33357020
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Comparing mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestion of chicken manure: Microbial community dynamics and process resilience.
    Niu Q; Takemura Y; Kubota K; Li YY
    Waste Manag; 2015 Sep; 43():114-22. PubMed ID: 26054964
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Stable thermophilic anaerobic digestion of dissolved air flotation (DAF) sludge by co-digestion with swine manure.
    Creamer KS; Chen Y; Williams CM; Cheng JJ
    Bioresour Technol; 2010 May; 101(9):3020-4. PubMed ID: 20060713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Mesophilic-thermophilic-mesophilic anaerobic digestion of liquid dairy cattle manure.
    Effenberger M; Bachmaier J; Garcés G; Gronauer A; Wilderer PA; Lebuhn M
    Water Sci Technol; 2006; 53(8):253-61. PubMed ID: 16784210
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. Drivers of microbial community composition in mesophilic and thermophilic temperature-phased anaerobic digestion pre-treatment reactors.
    Pervin HM; Dennis PG; Lim HJ; Tyson GW; Batstone DJ; Bond PL
    Water Res; 2013 Dec; 47(19):7098-108. PubMed ID: 24216229
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Anaerobic Mesophilic Codigestion of Rice Straw and Chicken Manure: Effects of Organic Loading Rate on Process Stability and Performance.
    Mei Z; Liu X; Huang X; Li D; Yan Z; Yuan Y; Huang Y
    Appl Biochem Biotechnol; 2016 Jul; 179(5):846-62. PubMed ID: 26940572
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Inhibition of volatile fatty acids on methane production kinetics during dry co-digestion of food waste and pig manure.
    Jiang Y; Dennehy C; Lawlor PG; Hu Z; McCabe M; Cormican P; Zhan X; Gardiner GE
    Waste Manag; 2018 Sep; 79():302-311. PubMed ID: 30343759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Effect of pig manure to grass silage ratio on methane production in batch anaerobic co-digestion of concentrated pig manure and grass silage.
    Xie S; Lawlor PG; Frost JP; Hu Z; Zhan X
    Bioresour Technol; 2011 May; 102(10):5728-33. PubMed ID: 21444203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Effects of chlorine disinfectants on the microbial community structure and the performance of anaerobic digestion of swine manure.
    Shao Z; Guo X; Qu Q; Kang K; Su Q; Wang C; Qiu L
    Bioresour Technol; 2021 Nov; 339():125576. PubMed ID: 34303098
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Anaerobic co-digestion of kitchen waste and pig manure with different mixing ratios.
    Tian H; Duan N; Lin C; Li X; Zhong M
    J Biosci Bioeng; 2015 Jul; 120(1):51-7. PubMed ID: 25617184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Indigenous microbial capability in solid manure residues to start-up solid-phase anaerobic digesters.
    Yap SD; Astals S; Jensen PD; Batstone DJ; Tait S
    Waste Manag; 2017 Jun; 64():79-87. PubMed ID: 28302526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Microbial profiling during anaerobic digestion of cheese whey in reactors operated at different conditions.
    Treu L; Tsapekos P; Peprah M; Campanaro S; Giacomini A; Corich V; Kougias PG; Angelidaki I
    Bioresour Technol; 2019 Mar; 275():375-385. PubMed ID: 30599281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Effects of intermittent mixing mode on solid state anaerobic digestion of agricultural wastes.
    Wang Y; Zhang J; Sun Y; Yu J; Zheng Z; Li S; Cui Z; Hao J; Li G
    Chemosphere; 2020 Jun; 248():126055. PubMed ID: 32018108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Effects of dairy manure-derived biochar on psychrophilic, mesophilic and thermophilic anaerobic digestions of dairy manure.
    Jang HM; Choi YK; Kan E
    Bioresour Technol; 2018 Feb; 250():927-931. PubMed ID: 29198415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Influence of thermophilic aerobic digestion as a sludge pre-treatment and solids retention time of mesophilic anaerobic digestion on the methane production, sludge digestion and microbial communities in a sequential digestion process.
    Jang HM; Cho HU; Park SK; Ha JH; Park JM
    Water Res; 2014 Jan; 48():1-14. PubMed ID: 23871253
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Survival of multidrug-resistant bacteria in thermophilic and mesophilic anaerobic co-digestion of dairy manure and waste milk.
    Beneragama N; Iwasaki M; Lateef SA; Yamashiro T; Ihara I; Umetsu K
    Anim Sci J; 2013 May; 84(5):426-433. PubMed ID: 23607603
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Effects of inoculum source and co-digestion strategies on anaerobic digestion of residues generated in the treatment of waste vegetable oils.
    Hidalgo D; Martín-Marroquín JM
    J Environ Manage; 2014 Sep; 142():17-22. PubMed ID: 24794521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. A study of two-stage anaerobic digestion of solid potato waste using reactors under mesophilic and thermophilic conditions.
    Parawira W; Murto M; Read JS; Mattiasson B
    Environ Technol; 2007 Nov; 28(11):1205-16. PubMed ID: 18290530
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Anaerobic co-digestion of chicken manure and cardboard waste: Focusing on methane production, microbial community analysis and energy evaluation.
    Zhao S; Chen W; Luo W; Fang H; Lv H; Liu R; Niu Q
    Bioresour Technol; 2021 Feb; 321():124429. PubMed ID: 33285504
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.