These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

141 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33126587)

  • 1. The Separative Performance of Modules with Polymeric Membranes for a Hybrid Adsorptive/Membrane Process of CO
    Janusz-Cygan A; Jaschik J; Wojdyła A; Tańczyk M
    Membranes (Basel); 2020 Oct; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 33126587
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Upgrading Biogas from Small Agricultural Sources into Biomethane by Membrane Separation.
    Janusz-Cygan A; Jaschik J; Tańczyk M
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Nov; 11(12):. PubMed ID: 34940438
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Data concerning adsorption equilibria of carbon dioxide, nitrogen and oxygen over a zeolite molecular sieve 13X for the modelling of carbon dioxide capture from gaseous mixtures by adsorptive processes.
    Jaschik M; Tanczyk M; Jaschik J; Janusz-Cygan A
    Data Brief; 2020 Jun; 30():105638. PubMed ID: 32420427
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. New hybrid membrane vacuum swing adsorption process for CO
    Zarghampoor MH; Soleimani M; Mozaffarian M; Ravanchi MT
    Environ Sci Pollut Res Int; 2022 Dec; 29(60):90820-90834. PubMed ID: 35876995
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Recent Progress in the Engineering of Polymeric Membranes for CO
    Han Y; Yang Y; Ho WSW
    Membranes (Basel); 2020 Nov; 10(11):. PubMed ID: 33238418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Evaluation of polymeric membranes' performance during laboratory-scale experiments, regarding the CO
    Koutsiantzi C; Mitrakas M; Zouboulis A; Kellartzis I; Stavropoulos G; Kikkinides ES
    Chemosphere; 2022 Jul; 299():134224. PubMed ID: 35339525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. CO
    Hassanpouryouzband A; Yang J; Tohidi B; Chuvilin E; Istomin V; Bukhanov B; Cheremisin A
    Environ Sci Technol; 2018 Apr; 52(7):4324-4330. PubMed ID: 29513532
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Multicomponent Spiral Wound Membrane Separation Model for CO
    Abdul Latif AA; Lau KK; Low SC; Azeem B
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Aug; 11(9):. PubMed ID: 34564471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Poly(ionic liquid)/Ionic Liquid Ion-Gels with High "Free" Ionic Liquid Content: Platform Membrane Materials for CO2/Light Gas Separations.
    Cowan MG; Gin DL; Noble RD
    Acc Chem Res; 2016 Apr; 49(4):724-32. PubMed ID: 27046045
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Numerical Simulation and Optimization of 4-Component LDG Separation in the Steelmaking Industry Using Polysulfone Hollow Fiber Membranes.
    Jeon JY; Park BR; Kim JH
    Membranes (Basel); 2022 Jan; 12(1):. PubMed ID: 35054623
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Impacts of Green Synthesis Process on Asymmetric Hybrid PDMS Membrane for Efficient CO
    Zhuang GL; Wu CF; Wey MY; Tseng HH
    Membranes (Basel); 2021 Jan; 11(1):. PubMed ID: 33467589
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Prediction of MOF Performance in Vacuum Swing Adsorption Systems for Postcombustion CO
    Burns TD; Pai KN; Subraveti SG; Collins SP; Krykunov M; Rajendran A; Woo TK
    Environ Sci Technol; 2020 Apr; 54(7):4536-4544. PubMed ID: 32091203
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Cycle development and design for CO2 capture from flue gas by vacuum swing adsorption.
    Zhang J; Webley PA
    Environ Sci Technol; 2008 Jan; 42(2):563-9. PubMed ID: 18284163
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Tool for optimization of energy consumption of membrane-based carbon capture.
    Zach B; Pluskal J; Šomplák R; Jadrný J; Šyc M
    J Environ Manage; 2022 Oct; 320():115913. PubMed ID: 36056498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Synthesis and Characterization of Hybrid Metal Zeolitic Imidazolate Framework Membrane for Efficient H
    Chang PH; Lee YT; Peng CH
    Materials (Basel); 2020 Nov; 13(21):. PubMed ID: 33172108
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. High-Throughput Screening of MOF Adsorbents and Membranes for H
    Avci G; Velioglu S; Keskin S
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2018 Oct; 10(39):33693-33706. PubMed ID: 30193065
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Dual-Channel, Molecular-Sieving Core/Shell ZIF@MOF Architectures as Engineered Fillers in Hybrid Membranes for Highly Selective CO
    Song Z; Qiu F; Zaia EW; Wang Z; Kunz M; Guo J; Brady M; Mi B; Urban JJ
    Nano Lett; 2017 Nov; 17(11):6752-6758. PubMed ID: 29072837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. CO
    Chuah CY; Lee J; Song J; Bae TH
    Membranes (Basel); 2020 Jul; 10(7):. PubMed ID: 32709044
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Database for CO
    Altintas C; Avci G; Daglar H; Nemati Vesali Azar A; Velioglu S; Erucar I; Keskin S
    ACS Appl Mater Interfaces; 2018 May; 10(20):17257-17268. PubMed ID: 29722965
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Tailor-Made Modification of Commercial Ceramic Membranes for Environmental and Energy-Oriented Gas Separation Applications.
    Grekou TK; Koutsonikolas DE; Karagiannakis G; Kikkinides ES
    Membranes (Basel); 2022 Mar; 12(3):. PubMed ID: 35323782
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.