These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
110 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3312804)
41. [Digital subtraction ventriculography in determining global and regional left ventricular parameters compared to left catheterization cardiography]. Eichstädt H; Langer M; Felix R Radiologe; 1984 Jun; 24(6):277-85. PubMed ID: 6382430 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
42. Television-computer dimensional analysis interface with special application to left ventricular cineangiograms. Covvey HD; Adelman AG; Felderhof CH; Taylor KW; Wigle ED Comput Biol Med; 1972 Nov; 2(3):221-33. PubMed ID: 4668648 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
43. Digital angiography in the pediatric patient with congenital heart disease: comparison with standard methods. Levin AR; Goldberg HL; Borer JS; Rothenberg LN; Nolan FA; Engle MA; Cohen B; Skelly NT; Carter J Circulation; 1983 Aug; 68(2):374-84. PubMed ID: 6345022 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. Digital subtraction angiography in the evaluation of left ventricular function and wall motion in man. O'Connor MK; Quigley PJ; Gearty GF Eur Heart J; 1984 Aug; 5(8):652-9. PubMed ID: 6207025 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
45. [Determination of global left ventricular functional parameters with intraventricular digital subtraction angiography in coronary disease]. Rother T; Krosse B; Neugebauer A; Duck HJ; Gosch D Z Gesamte Inn Med; 1988 Apr; 43(7):171-6. PubMed ID: 3291433 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
46. Validation of geometric methods for estimating segmental myocardial motion of the left ventricle at cineangiography. Lipton MJ; Ringertz HG; Davis PL; Carlsson E Acta Radiol Diagn (Stockh); 1981; 22(6):681-5. PubMed ID: 7347120 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
47. Comparative angiographic right and left ventricular volumes. Pietras RJ; Kondos GT; Kaplan D; Lam W Am Heart J; 1985 Feb; 109(2):321-6. PubMed ID: 3966348 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
48. [Ejection fraction of the left ventricle obtained by radioisotopic angiocardiography. Correlation with values provided by conventional ventriculography]. Ascer E; Pimentel Filho WA; Fernandes Martins LR; Marioni Filho H; Queiroga Filho AF; Alonso G; Germek OA; Thom AF; Sousa JE Arq Bras Cardiol; 1983 Feb; 40(2):83-6. PubMed ID: 6625948 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Digital subtraction angiography: a review of cardiac applications. Mancini GB; Higgins CB Prog Cardiovasc Dis; 1985; 28(2):111-41. PubMed ID: 3898224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. [Determination of the right ventricular ejection fraction from the exponential decrease in the thermodilution curve--a comparison with biplanar cineventriculography]. Unterberg R; Gruber HP; Ickrath O; Voelker W; Karsch KR Z Kardiol; 1989 May; 78(5):313-9. PubMed ID: 2735092 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Use of intravenous digital subtraction ventriculography in the evaluation of left ventricle volumes and ejection fraction. Perondi R; Gregorini L; Pomidossi G; Saino A; Alessio P; Zanchetti A; Mancia G Eur Heart J; 1991 Mar; 12(3):363-7. PubMed ID: 2040319 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
52. Harmonic subtraction for evaluating right ventricle ejection fraction from planar equilibrium radionuclide angiography. Bonta DV; Aarsvold JN; Grant SF; Alazraki NP Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2017 Nov; 33(11):1857-1862. PubMed ID: 28516314 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
53. Left ventricle evaluation by digital video subtraction angiocardiography. Engels PH; Ludwig JW; Verhoeven LA Radiology; 1982 Aug; 144(3):471-4. PubMed ID: 7048415 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
54. [Morphometric and densitometric assessment of left ventricular function in the digital subtraction angiocardiogram]. Franken T; Christ F; Becher H; Thurn P Rofo; 1985 Sep; 143(3):268-74. PubMed ID: 2996062 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
55. Quantitation of left ventricular dimensions and function by digital video subtraction angiography. Higgins CB; Norris SL; Gerber KH; Slutsky RA; Ashburn WL; Baily N Radiology; 1982 Aug; 144(3):461-9. PubMed ID: 7048414 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
56. Evaluation of the densitometric method of ejection fraction by direct digital subtraction left ventriculography. Shiba K; Nanki M; Hori H; Sakamoto N Cathet Cardiovasc Diagn; 1991 May; 23(1):61-6. PubMed ID: 1863965 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
57. [A quantitative evaluation of left ventricular function by digital subtraction angiography without contrast medium: time-activity curve and Fourier analysis]. Ikeda H; Shibao K; Ohkita Y; Sugi K; Toshima H; Koga Y; Utsu F Kokyu To Junkan; 1985 Dec; 33(12):1495-500. PubMed ID: 3914020 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Prospective comparison of exercise digital subtraction and exercise first pass radionuclide ventriculography. Detrano R; Yiannikas J; Simpfendorfer C; Underwood DA; Salcedo EE; Rollins M Clin Cardiol; 1986 Sep; 9(9):417-22. PubMed ID: 3530570 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
59. [Application of data processing. b. Digital subtraction angiography]. Takamiya M; Ohta M; Kozuka T Nihon Rinsho; 1984 Dec; 42(12):2764-9. PubMed ID: 6397637 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. Comparison of single and biplane ventriculography for determination of left ventricular volume and ejection fraction. Brogan WC; Glamann B; Lange RA; Hillis LD Am J Cardiol; 1992 Apr; 69(12):1079-82. PubMed ID: 1561982 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]