These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

118 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33128647)

  • 41. Cervical vertebrae anomalies in orthodontic patients: a growth-based superimpositional approach.
    Koletsis DD; Halazonetis DJ
    Eur J Orthod; 2010 Feb; 32(1):36-42. PubMed ID: 19525440
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Comparative long term post-treatment changes in hyperdivergent Class II Division 1 patients with early cervical traction treatment.
    Junkin JB; Andria LM
    Angle Orthod; 2002 Feb; 72(1):5-14. PubMed ID: 11843274
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Duration of the peak of adolescent growth spurt in class i and ii malocclusion subjects using a cervical vertebrae maturation analysis.
    Salazar-Lazo R; Arriola-Guillén LE; Flores-Mir C
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2014; 27(2):96-101. PubMed ID: 25523962
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Comparison of the Stability After Mandibular Setback With Minimal Orthodontics of Class III Patients With Different Facial Types.
    Lee YS; Kim YK; Yun PY; Larson BE; Lee NK
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2016 Jul; 74(7):1464.e1-1464.e10. PubMed ID: 27060493
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. A study of the growth changes in facial configuration.
    Chang HP; Kinoshita Z; Kawamoto T
    Eur J Orthod; 1993 Dec; 15(6):493-501. PubMed ID: 8112415
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The effect of cervical headgear on patients with high or low mandibular plane angles and the "myth" of posterior mandibular rotation.
    Haralabakis NB; Sifakakis IB
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2004 Sep; 126(3):310-7. PubMed ID: 15356494
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. Semi-longitudinal Study of the Mcnamara Cephalometric Triangle in Class II and Class III Subjects Grouped by Cervical Vertebrae Maturation Stage.
    Arriola-Guillén LE; Fitzcarrald FD; Flores-Mir C
    Acta Odontol Latinoam; 2015 Dec; 28(3):222-30. PubMed ID: 27095622
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. RELIABILITY OF VARIOUS SKELETAL INDICATORS IN ASSESSING VERTICAL FACIAL SOFT TISSUE PATTERN.
    Ahmed M; Shaikh A; Fida M
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2016; 28(1):7-13. PubMed ID: 27323552
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Assessing skeletal relationships using the cervical vertebral curvature.
    Shaikh A; Khan M; Rashna HS
    Int J Orthod Milwaukee; 2011; 22(4):27-31. PubMed ID: 22360079
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. The magnitude of angular and translational displacement of dens fractures is dependent on the sagittal alignment of the cervical spine rather than the force of injury.
    Blizzard SR; Krishnamoorthy B; Shinseki M; Betsch M; Yoo J
    Spine J; 2017 Dec; 17(12):1859-1865. PubMed ID: 28694217
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. Three-dimensional analysis of soft tissue changes in full-face view after surgical correction of skeletal class III malocclusion.
    Yuan L; Shen G; Wu Y; Jiang L; Yang Z; Liu J; Mao L; Fang B
    J Craniofac Surg; 2013 May; 24(3):725-30. PubMed ID: 23714867
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Dentoskeletal morphology in adults with Class I, Class II Division 1, or Class II Division 2 malocclusion with increased overbite.
    Uzuner FD; Aslan BI; Dinçer M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2019 Aug; 156(2):248-256.e2. PubMed ID: 31375235
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. C7 sagittal vertical axis is the determinant of the C5-C7 angle in cervical sagittal alignment.
    Matsubayashi Y; Chikuda H; Oshima Y; Taniguchi Y; Fujimoto Y; Shimizu T; Tanaka S
    Spine J; 2017 May; 17(5):622-626. PubMed ID: 27871819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. Quantitative anatomy of the second cervical vertebra.
    Doherty BJ; Heggeness MH
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 1995 Mar; 20(5):513-7. PubMed ID: 7604318
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Masseter muscle thickness in different skeletal morphology: an ultrasonographic study.
    Rani S; Ravi MS
    Indian J Dent Res; 2010; 21(3):402-7. PubMed ID: 20930353
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Sagittal spinal posture in relation to craniofacial morphology.
    Lippold C; Danesh G; Hoppe G; Drerup B; Hackenberg L
    Angle Orthod; 2006 Jul; 76(4):625-31. PubMed ID: 16808569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Change in cranio-cervical angulation following orthognathic surgery.
    Savjani D; Wertheim D; Edler R
    Eur J Orthod; 2005 Jun; 27(3):268-73. PubMed ID: 15947227
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Cephalometric evaluation of the effects of the Twin Block appliance in subjects with Class II, Division 1 malocclusion amongst different cervical vertebral maturation stages.
    Khoja A; Fida M; Shaikh A
    Dental Press J Orthod; 2016 Jun; 21(3):73-84. PubMed ID: 27409656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Morphometric analysis of cervical interlaminar space for posterior surgical approach and decompression.
    Louie PK; Perez AA; Steinhaus ME; Wright-Chisem J; Albert TJ; Kim HJ; Lafage V; Iyer S; Qureshi S; Katsuura Y
    Surg Radiol Anat; 2021 Jun; 43(6):873-879. PubMed ID: 33159550
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. Malocclusion and facial morphology is there a relationship? An epidemiologic study.
    Siriwat PP; Jarabak JR
    Angle Orthod; 1985 Apr; 55(2):127-38. PubMed ID: 3874569
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.