These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

112 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33128647)

  • 61. Comparison between sheep and human cervical spines: an anatomic, radiographic, bone mineral density, and biomechanical study.
    Kandziora F; Pflugmacher R; Scholz M; Schnake K; Lucke M; Schröder R; Mittlmeier T
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 May; 26(9):1028-37. PubMed ID: 11337621
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 62. Morphometric analysis of cervical vertebrae in relation to mandibular growth.
    Gray S; Bennani H; Kieser JA; Farella M
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2016 Jan; 149(1):92-8. PubMed ID: 26718383
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 63. Cross-sectional human mandibular morphology as assessed in vivo by cone-beam computed tomography in patients with different vertical facial dimensions.
    Swasty D; Lee J; Huang JC; Maki K; Gansky SA; Hatcher D; Miller AJ
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Apr; 139(4 Suppl):e377-89. PubMed ID: 21435546
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 64. Cervical vertebrae anomalies in patients with class III skeletal malocclusion.
    Meibodi SE; Parhiz H; Motamedi MH; Fetrati A; Meibodi EM; Meshkat A
    J Craniovertebr Junction Spine; 2011 Jul; 2(2):73-6. PubMed ID: 23125492
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 65. Association between morphology of the first cervical vertebra, head posture, and craniofacial structures.
    Huggare J
    Eur J Orthod; 1991 Dec; 13(6):435-40. PubMed ID: 1817068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 66. Photographic Assessment of Cephalometric Measurements in Skeletal Class II Cases: A Comparative Study.
    Mehta P; Sagarkar RM; Mathew S
    J Clin Diagn Res; 2017 Jun; 11(6):ZC60-ZC64. PubMed ID: 28764295
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 67. Effect of Maxillary Posterior Space Discrepancy on the Molars and Overbite in Class II Malocclusions with Different Vertical Patterns.
    Golfeshan F; Khandadash S; Salehi P; Afsa M
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Apr; 21(4):438-444. PubMed ID: 32584283
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 68. Changes in Cervical Lordosis and Cervicovertebral Morphology in Different Ages with the Possibility of Estimating Skeletal Maturity.
    Lazić E; Glišić B; Stamenković Z; Nedeljković N
    Srp Arh Celok Lek; 2015; 143(11-12):662-8. PubMed ID: 26946759
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 69. Components of adult Class III malocclusion.
    Ellis E; McNamara JA
    J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 1984 May; 42(5):295-305. PubMed ID: 6585502
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 70. Comparison of cervical sagittal parameters among patients with neck pain and healthy controls: a comparative cross-sectional study.
    Jouibari MF; Le Huec JC; Ranjbar Hameghavandi MH; Moghadam N; Farahbakhsh F; Khadivi M; Rostami M; Kordi R
    Eur Spine J; 2019 Oct; 28(10):2319-2324. PubMed ID: 31444609
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 71. Reference structures for assessment of frontal head posture.
    Zepa I; Huggare J
    Eur J Orthod; 1998 Dec; 20(6):694-9. PubMed ID: 9926636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 72. Computed tomography evaluation of mandibular incisor bony support in untreated patients.
    Gracco A; Luca L; Bongiorno MC; Siciliani G
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2010 Aug; 138(2):179-87. PubMed ID: 20691359
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 73. [Study of the incisive alveolar structure in different vertical facial types between osteal Class III malocclusion and normal occlusion].
    Guo XX; Wang CL; Wei FL; Xu LY; Kou B
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2005 Dec; 14(6):593-6. PubMed ID: 16400486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 74. An evaluation of the Pi analysis in the assessment of anteroposterior jaw relationship.
    Kumar S; Valiathan A; Gautam P; Chakravarthy K; Jayaswal P
    J Orthod; 2012 Dec; 39(4):262-9. PubMed ID: 23269690
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 75. FACIAL SOFT TISSUE ANALYSIS AMONG VARIOUS VERTICAL FACIAL PATTERNS.
    Jeelani W; Fida M; Shaikh A
    J Ayub Med Coll Abbottabad; 2016; 28(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 27323557
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 76. Characterization of Sagittal Spine Alignment With Reference to the Gravity Line and Vertebral Slopes: An Analysis of Different Roussouly Curves.
    Hey HWD; Tan KA; Thadani VN; Liu GK; Wong HK
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2020 May; 45(9):E481-E488. PubMed ID: 32282653
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 77. Reliability of cephalograms derived of cone beam computed tomography versus lateral cephalograms to estimate cervical vertebrae maturity in a Peruvian population: A retrospective study.
    Echevarría-Sánchez G; Arriola-Guillén LE; Malpartida-Carrillo V; Tinedo-López PL; Palti-Menendez R; Guerrero ME
    Int Orthod; 2020 Jun; 18(2):258-265. PubMed ID: 32014428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 78. Cervical vertebrae maturation method morphologic criteria: poor reproducibility.
    Nestman TS; Marshall SD; Qian F; Holton N; Franciscus RG; Southard TE
    Am J Orthod Dentofacial Orthop; 2011 Aug; 140(2):182-8. PubMed ID: 21803255
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 79. The location of the pedicle and pars interarticularis in the axis.
    Ebraheim NA; Fow J; Xu R; Yeasting RA
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2001 Feb; 26(4):E34-7. PubMed ID: 11224898
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 80. Craniofacial features as assessed by lateral cephalometric measurements in children with Down syndrome.
    Allareddy V; Ching N; Macklin EA; Voelz L; Weintraub G; Davidson E; Prock LA; Rosen D; Brunn R; Skotko BG
    Prog Orthod; 2016 Dec; 17(1):35. PubMed ID: 27722998
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.