These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
157 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3312887)
1. Medical lasers and the law. Norton ML; Norton EV Leg Med; 1986; ():134-47. PubMed ID: 3312887 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
2. Potential liability for institutional review boards and bioethics committees. Reider A Home Care Econ; 1987; 1(4):119-21. PubMed ID: 10285379 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Protection of human subjects; informed consent; standards for institutional review boards for clinical investigations--FDA. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1991 Jun; 56(117):28025-9. PubMed ID: 10112215 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The IRB as deputy sheriff: proposed FDA regulation of the institutional review board. Huff TA Clin Res; 1979 Apr; 27(2):103-8. PubMed ID: 10241072 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions. Jansson RL Wash Law Rev; 2003 Feb; 78(1):229-63. PubMed ID: 15732212 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Expert testimony: a perspective from the trenches. Hawkins TS J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):126-30. PubMed ID: 17411781 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Expert testimony: a contrary perspective from the trenches. Berlin L J Am Coll Radiol; 2005 Feb; 2(2):131-2. PubMed ID: 17411782 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
8. Protection of human subjects; informed consent; standards for institutional review boards for clinical investigations--FDA. Proposed rule. Fed Regist; 1988 Nov; 53(218):45678-82. PubMed ID: 10290533 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Medical devices; procedures for investigational device exemptions--Food and Drug Administration. Final rule. Fed Regist; 1980 Jan; 45(13):3732-59. PubMed ID: 10248822 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. [Pioneer interventions in surgery and their legal background]. Deutsch E Zentralbl Chir; 1992; 117(10):569-74. PubMed ID: 1441783 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
11. Legal liability for medical innovation. Epstein RA Spec Law Dig Health Care (Mon); 1989 May; (123):7-27. PubMed ID: 10292879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
12. Professional liability. Mandell MS R I Med J (1976); 1984 Jun; 67(6):279-81. PubMed ID: 6588448 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Bioethical malpractice: risk and responsibilities in human research. Noah BA J Health Care Law Policy; 2004; 7(2):175-241. PubMed ID: 15573441 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Task force 5: Expert testimony and opinions. Bonow RO; Zipes DP; Anderson JL; Cheitlin MD; Goldstein LB; Grant AO; Faxon D; Lima JA; Robertson RM J Am Coll Cardiol; 2004 Oct; 44(8):1747-9. PubMed ID: 15489119 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Institutional review boards and bioethics committees: their role in ensuring ethical home care research. Cary AH Home Care Econ; 1987; 1(4):113-8. PubMed ID: 10285378 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
17. Challenges in human subject protection. Nightingale SL Food Drug Law J; 1995; 50(4):493-501. PubMed ID: 10343016 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. Institutional Review Board policies and procedures provide protection for human research subjects and hospitals. Reynolds MB Health Care Law Newsl; 1992 Sep; 7(9):7-11. PubMed ID: 10123075 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Protection of human subjects: Institutional Review Board; report and recommendations of National Commission for the Protection of Human Subjects of Biomedical and Behavioral Research. Fed Regist; 1978 Nov; 43(231):56173-98. PubMed ID: 10239683 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
20. [Psychiatry and the law in German-speaking countries]. Dittmann V Psychiatr Prax; 1993 Sep; 20(5):165. PubMed ID: 8248439 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]