These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
152 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3312887)
41. Developing regulations for research involving adults who lack decision-making capacity. Fleischman AR Trans Am Clin Climatol Assoc; 1999; 110():131-43; discussion 143-5. PubMed ID: 10344013 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
42. [Effect of criminal justice on civil rights apprehension]. Deutsch E Z Arztl Fortbild Qualitatssich; 1998 Oct; 92(8-9):634-8. PubMed ID: 9885175 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
44. An even safer safety net. Prentice E Hastings Cent Rep; 1997; 27(3):46. PubMed ID: 11644996 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
45. Media watch. Thier SL West J Med; 1999 Jul; 171(1):53-4. PubMed ID: 10483348 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
46. Nontherapeutic research on subjects unable to grant consent. Frank S; Agich GJ Clin Res; 1985 Oct; 33(4):459-64. PubMed ID: 4053504 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
47. Cancer nursing and the law. The theory of a medical malpractice case. Gargaro WJ Cancer Nurs; 1985 Dec; 8(6):341-2. PubMed ID: 3854969 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
48. [Informed consent after enlightenment by medical student]. Wienke A; Sailer R Laryngorhinootologie; 2014 Oct; 93(10):686-7. PubMed ID: 25302597 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
49. Promoting medical research without sacrificing patient autonomy: legal and ethical issues raised by the waiver of informed consent for emergency research. Carnahan SJ Oklahoma Law Rev; 1999; 52(4):565-91. PubMed ID: 12666673 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
50. Critical care research and informed consent. Saver RS North Carol Law Rev; 1996 Nov; 75(1):205-71. PubMed ID: 11768416 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
51. Courts, committees, and caring. Veatch RM Am Med News; 1980 May; 23(20):suppl 1-2, 11-3. PubMed ID: 10246552 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
53. Non-therapeutic medical research involving human subjects. Bloom MJ Syracuse Law Rev; 1973; 24():1067-1099. PubMed ID: 11664224 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
54. Defendant-researcher claims that federal regulations on informed consent are too vague. Maloney DM Hum Res Rep; 2002 Nov; 17(11):8. PubMed ID: 12708414 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
55. New standards for clinical research. Hecht A FDA Consum; 1978 Nov; 12(9):16-9. PubMed ID: 10308752 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
56. Informed consent. Victor MG Med Trial Tech Q; 1980; 27(2):138-75. PubMed ID: 6927796 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
58. Tales of informed consent: four years on an institutional review board. Bartolo Health Matrix Clevel; 1992; 2(2):193-245. PubMed ID: 10124879 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
59. [Preventable treatment errors in gynecology and obstetrics. From the practice of an expert commission]. Cyran W Gynakologe; 1994 Aug; 27(4):256-9. PubMed ID: 7959312 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
60. More tales from institutional review boards. Neuhauser D Health Matrix Clevel; 1994; 4(1):153-8. PubMed ID: 10142174 [No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related] [Previous] [Next] [New Search]