These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

147 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33129051)

  • 41. Dispositional factors account for age differences in self-reported mind-wandering.
    Nicosia J; Balota D
    Psychol Aging; 2021 Jun; 36(4):421-432. PubMed ID: 34124919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 42. Effects of task complexity and age-differences on task-related functional connectivity of attentional networks.
    O'Connell MA; Basak C
    Neuropsychologia; 2018 Jun; 114():50-64. PubMed ID: 29655800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 43. Mind-wandering in healthy aging and early stage Alzheimer's disease.
    Gyurkovics M; Balota DA; Jackson JD
    Neuropsychology; 2018 Jan; 32(1):89-101. PubMed ID: 28627905
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 44. Similarities and differences between mind-wandering and external distraction: a latent variable analysis of lapses of attention and their relation to cognitive abilities.
    Unsworth N; McMillan BD
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2014 Jul; 150():14-25. PubMed ID: 24793128
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 45. Concurrent prospective memory task increases mind wandering during online reading for difficult but not easy texts.
    Schurer T; Opitz B; Schubert T
    Mem Cognit; 2023 Jan; 51(1):221-233. PubMed ID: 35233743
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 46. The contribution of attentional lapses to individual differences in visual working memory capacity.
    Adam KC; Mance I; Fukuda K; Vogel EK
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2015 Aug; 27(8):1601-16. PubMed ID: 25811710
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 47. The influence of thought probes on performance: Does the mind wander more if you ask it?
    Wiemers EA; Redick TS
    Psychon Bull Rev; 2019 Feb; 26(1):367-373. PubMed ID: 30225780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 48. Influence of content and intensity of thought on behavioral and pupil changes during active mind-wandering, off-focus, and on-task states.
    Jubera-García E; Gevers W; Van Opstal F
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2020 Jun; 82(3):1125-1135. PubMed ID: 31515772
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 49. Age-related changes in the temporal focus and self-referential content of spontaneous cognition during periods of low cognitive demand.
    Irish M; Goldberg ZL; Alaeddin S; O'Callaghan C; Andrews-Hanna JR
    Psychol Res; 2019 Jun; 83(4):747-760. PubMed ID: 30291418
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 50. Self-Reported Stickiness of Mind-Wandering Affects Task Performance.
    van Vugt MK; Broers N
    Front Psychol; 2016; 7():732. PubMed ID: 27242636
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 51. A multimodal analysis of sustained attention in younger and older adults.
    Robison MK; Diede NT; Nicosia J; Ball BH; Bugg JM
    Psychol Aging; 2022 May; 37(3):307-325. PubMed ID: 35446084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 52. Using ecological momentary assessments to evaluate extant measures of mind wandering.
    Ostojic-Aitkens D; Brooker B; Miller CJ
    Psychol Assess; 2019 Jun; 31(6):817-827. PubMed ID: 30742460
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 53. Experience sampling of the degree of mind wandering distinguishes hidden attentional states.
    Zanesco AP; Denkova E; Witkin JE; Jha AP
    Cognition; 2020 Dec; 205():104380. PubMed ID: 32863021
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 54. [Inhibition and resource capacity during normal aging: a confrontation of the dorsal-ventral and frontal models in a modified version of negative priming].
    Martin S; Brouillet D; Guerdoux E; Tarrago R
    Encephale; 2006; 32(2 Pt 1):253-62. PubMed ID: 16910627
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 55. Divided attention in younger and older adults: effects of strategy and relatedness on memory performance and secondary task costs.
    Naveh-Benjamin M; Craik FI; Guez J; Kreuger S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2005 May; 31(3):520-37. PubMed ID: 15910135
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 56. Can research participants comment authoritatively on the validity of their self-reports of mind wandering and task engagement? A replication and extension of Seli, Jonker, Cheyne, Cortes, and Smilek (2015).
    Meier ME
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 2018 Oct; 44(10):1567-1585. PubMed ID: 30035559
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 57. Age-related differences in reallocating cognitive resources when dealing with interruptions.
    Arnau S; Wascher E; Küper K
    Neuroimage; 2019 May; 191():292-302. PubMed ID: 30798011
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 58. Daydreaming style moderates the relation between working memory and mind wandering: Integrating two hypotheses.
    Marcusson-Clavertz D; Cardeña E; Terhune DB
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2016 Mar; 42(3):451-464. PubMed ID: 26371497
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 59. Mind wandering and the attention network system.
    Gonçalves ÓF; Rêgo G; Oliveira-Silva P; Leite J; Carvalho S; Fregni F; Amaro E; Boggio PS
    Acta Psychol (Amst); 2017 Jan; 172():49-54. PubMed ID: 27886519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 60. The neurotic wandering mind: An individual differences investigation of neuroticism, mind-wandering, and executive control.
    Robison MK; Gath KI; Unsworth N
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2017 Apr; 70(4):649-663. PubMed ID: 26821933
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 8.