116 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33129626)
1. Adaptive Proton Therapy for Pediatric Patients: Improving the Quality of the Delivered Plan With On-Treatment MRI.
Acharya S; Wang C; Quesada S; Gargone MA; Ates O; Uh J; Krasin MJ; Merchant TE; Hua CH
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2021 Jan; 109(1):242-251. PubMed ID: 33129626
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Intra-fractional per-beam adaptive workflow to mitigate the need for a rotating gantry during MRI-guided proton therapy.
Guerreiro F; Svensson S; Seravalli E; Traneus E; Raaymakers BW
Phys Med Biol; 2021 Sep; 66(18):. PubMed ID: 34298523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Feasibility of automated proton therapy plan adaptation for head and neck tumors using cone beam CT images.
Kurz C; Nijhuis R; Reiner M; Ganswindt U; Thieke C; Belka C; Parodi K; Landry G
Radiat Oncol; 2016 Apr; 11():64. PubMed ID: 27129305
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Retrospective study comparing MR-guided radiation therapy (MRgRT) setup strategies for prostate treatment: repositioning vs. replanning.
Kim JI; Park JM; Choi CH; An HJ; Kim YJ; Kim JH
Radiat Oncol; 2019 Aug; 14(1):139. PubMed ID: 31387593
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Adaptive Proton Therapy for Pediatric Parameningeal Rhabdomyosarcoma: On-Treatment Anatomic Changes and Timing to Replanning.
Uh J; Jordan JA; Pappo AS; Krasin MJ; Hua C
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2023 Apr; 35(4):245-254. PubMed ID: 36764878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. A Monte-Carlo study to assess the effect of 1.5 T magnetic fields on the overall robustness of pencil-beam scanning proton radiotherapy plans for prostate cancer.
Kurz C; Landry G; Resch AF; Dedes G; Kamp F; Ganswindt U; Belka C; Raaymakers BW; Parodi K
Phys Med Biol; 2017 Oct; 62(21):8470-8482. PubMed ID: 29047455
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Feasibility of dynamic adaptive passive scattering proton therapy with computed tomography image guidance in the lung.
Moriya S; Tachibana H; Hotta K; Nakamura N; Sakae T; Akimoto T
Med Phys; 2017 Sep; 44(9):4474-4481. PubMed ID: 28665491
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Daily Adaptive Proton Therapy: Is it Appropriate to Use Analytical Dose Calculations for Plan Adaption?
Nenoff L; Matter M; Jarhall AG; Winterhalter C; Gorgisyan J; Josipovic M; Persson GF; Munck Af Rosenschold P; Weber DC; Lomax AJ; Albertini F
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2020 Jul; 107(4):747-755. PubMed ID: 32275996
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Prospective MRI-based imaging study to assess feasibility of proton therapy for post-prostatectomy radiation.
Swisher-McClure S; Yin L; Rosen M; Batra S; Berman AT; Both S; Vapiwala N
Acta Oncol; 2016 Jul; 55(7):828-33. PubMed ID: 27145164
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Dosimetric Evaluation of Incorporating Patient Geometric Variations Into Adaptive Plan Optimization Through Probabilistic Treatment Planning in Head and Neck Cancers.
Liu Q; Liang J; Zhou D; Krauss DJ; Chen PY; Yan D
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2018 Jul; 101(4):985-997. PubMed ID: 29976511
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Highly Conformal Craniospinal Radiotherapy Techniques Can Underdose the Cranial Clinical Target Volume if Leptomeningeal Extension through Skull Base Exit Foramina is not Contoured.
Noble DJ; Ajithkumar T; Lambert J; Gleeson I; Williams MV; Jefferies SJ
Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol); 2017 Jul; 29(7):439-447. PubMed ID: 28318880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Comparing proton treatment plans of pediatric brain tumors in two pencil beam scanning nozzles with different spot sizes.
Kralik JC; Xi L; Solberg TD; Simone CB; Lin L
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2015 Nov; 16(6):41-50. PubMed ID: 26699553
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Dose uncertainties in IMPT for oropharyngeal cancer in the presence of anatomical, range, and setup errors.
Kraan AC; van de Water S; Teguh DN; Al-Mamgani A; Madden T; Kooy HM; Heijmen BJ; Hoogeman MS
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2013 Dec; 87(5):888-96. PubMed ID: 24351409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Plan-library supported automated replanning for online-adaptive intensity-modulated proton therapy of cervical cancer.
Jagt TZ; Breedveld S; van Haveren R; Nout RA; Astreinidou E; Heijmen BJM; Hoogeman MS
Acta Oncol; 2019 Oct; 58(10):1440-1445. PubMed ID: 31271076
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
15. Feasibility and robustness of dose painting by numbers in proton therapy with contour-driven plan optimization.
Barragán AM; Differding S; Janssens G; Lee JA; Sterpin E
Med Phys; 2015 Apr; 42(4):2006-17. PubMed ID: 25832091
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Head and Neck Margin Reduction With Adaptive Radiation Therapy: Robustness of Treatment Plans Against Anatomy Changes.
van Kranen S; Hamming-Vrieze O; Wolf A; Damen E; van Herk M; Sonke JJ
Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys; 2016 Nov; 96(3):653-60. PubMed ID: 27681762
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Potential proton and photon dose degradation in advanced head and neck cancer patients by intratherapy changes.
Stützer K; Jakobi A; Bandurska-Luque A; Barczyk S; Arnsmeyer C; Löck S; Richter C
J Appl Clin Med Phys; 2017 Nov; 18(6):104-113. PubMed ID: 28921843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Feasibility of MRI-only treatment planning for proton therapy in brain and prostate cancers: Dose calculation accuracy in substitute CT images.
Koivula L; Wee L; Korhonen J
Med Phys; 2016 Aug; 43(8):4634. PubMed ID: 27487880
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Adaptive radiation therapy for pediatric head and neck malignancies: Dosimetric implications.
Laskar S; Pandit P; Mallik S; Tike P; Chaudhari S; Khanna N; Vora T
Pract Radiat Oncol; 2015; 5(2):e87-94. PubMed ID: 25413402
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. MRI-guided proton therapy planning: accounting for an inline MRI fringe field.
Burigo LN; Oborn BM
Phys Med Biol; 2019 Nov; 64(21):215015. PubMed ID: 31509819
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
