These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

287 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33129819)

  • 1. Comparisons of Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios: Predicting Functional Results of Coronary Revascularization Using Longitudinal Vessel Interrogation.
    Omori H; Kawase Y; Mizukami T; Tanigaki T; Hirata T; Kikuchi J; Ota H; Sobue Y; Miyake T; Kawamura I; Okubo M; Kamiya H; Hirakawa A; Kawasaki M; Nakagawa M; Tsuchiya K; Suzuki Y; Ito T; Terashima M; Kondo T; Suzuki T; Escaned J; Matsuo H
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Nov; 13(22):2688-2698. PubMed ID: 33129819
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prevalence of myocardial perfusion scintigraphy derived ischemia in coronary lesions with discordant fractional flow reserve and non-hyperemic pressure ratios.
    Higashioka D; Shiono Y; Emori H; Khalifa AKM; Takahata M; Wada T; Fujita S; Kashiwagi M; Shimamura K; Kuroi A; Tanimoto T; Kubo T; Akasaka T; Tanaka A
    Int J Cardiol; 2022 Jun; 357():20-25. PubMed ID: 35219745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Coronary Flow Variations Following Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Affect Diastolic Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios More Than the Whole Cycle Ratios.
    Aetesam-Ur-Rahman M; Zhao TX; Paques K; Oliveira J; Khialani B; Kyranis S; Braganza DM; Clarke SC; Bennett MR; West NEJ; Hoole SP
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2022 May; 11(9):e023554. PubMed ID: 35470686
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Pre-Angioplasty Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio Pullback Predicts Hemodynamic Outcome In Humans With Coronary Artery Disease: Primary Results of the International Multicenter iFR GRADIENT Registry.
    Kikuta Y; Cook CM; Sharp ASP; Salinas P; Kawase Y; Shiono Y; Giavarini A; Nakayama M; De Rosa S; Sen S; Nijjer SS; Al-Lamee R; Petraco R; Malik IS; Mikhail GW; Kaprielian RR; Wijntjens GWM; Mori S; Hagikura A; Mates M; Mizuno A; Hellig F; Lee K; Janssens L; Horie K; Mohdnazri S; Herrera R; Krackhardt F; Yamawaki M; Davies J; Takebayashi H; Keeble T; Haruta S; Ribichini F; Indolfi C; Mayet J; Francis DP; Piek JJ; Di Mario C; Escaned J; Matsuo H; Davies JE
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Apr; 11(8):757-767. PubMed ID: 29673507
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Physiological and Clinical Assessment of Resting Physiological Indexes.
    Lee JM; Choi KH; Park J; Hwang D; Rhee TM; Kim J; Park J; Kim HY; Jung HW; Cho YK; Yoon HJ; Song YB; Hahn JY; Nam CW; Shin ES; Doh JH; Hur SH; Koo BK
    Circulation; 2019 Feb; 139(7):889-900. PubMed ID: 30586749
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Agreement Between iFR and Other Non-Hyperaemic Pressure Ratios in Severe Aortic Stenosis.
    Comella A; Chan J; Thakkar HV; Kim J; Michail M; Nicholls SJ; Gooley R; Ko B; Cameron JD; Brown AJ
    Cardiovasc Revasc Med; 2022 Aug; 41():47-52. PubMed ID: 35131173
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Pre-angioplasty instantaneous wave-free ratio pullback provides virtual intervention and predicts hemodynamic outcome for serial lesions and diffuse coronary artery disease.
    Nijjer SS; Sen S; Petraco R; Escaned J; Echavarria-Pinto M; Broyd C; Al-Lamee R; Foin N; Foale RA; Malik IS; Mikhail GW; Sethi AS; Al-Bustami M; Kaprielian RR; Khan MA; Baker CS; Bellamy MF; Hughes AD; Mayet J; Francis DP; Di Mario C; Davies JE
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2014 Dec; 7(12):1386-96. PubMed ID: 25459526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Prognostic impact of resting full-cycle ratio and diastolic non-hyperemic pressure ratios in patients with deferred revascularization.
    Halbach M; Ameskamp C; Mauri V; Ernst A; Lake P; Nienaber S; Baldus S; Adam M; Wienemann H
    Clin Res Cardiol; 2023 Sep; 112(9):1220-1230. PubMed ID: 36602599
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Real world validation of the nonhyperemic index of coronary artery stenosis severity-Resting full-cycle ratio-RE-VALIDATE.
    Kumar G; Desai R; Gore A; Rahim H; Maehara A; Matsumura M; Kirtane A; Jeremias A; Ali Z
    Catheter Cardiovasc Interv; 2020 Jul; 96(1):E53-E58. PubMed ID: 31631521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Validation of resting full-cycle ratio and diastolic pressure ratio with [
    Dahdal J; Bakker F; Svanerud J; Danad I; Driessen RS; Raijmakers PG; Harms HJ; Lammertsma AA; van de Hoef TP; Appelman Y; van Royen N; Knaapen P; de Waard GA
    Heart Vessels; 2024 Apr; 39(4):299-309. PubMed ID: 38367040
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Changes in post-PCI physiology based on anatomical vessel location: a DEFINE PCI substudy.
    Matsumura M; Maehara A; Davis JE; Kumar G; Sharp A; Samady H; Seto AH; Cohen D; Patel MR; Ali ZA; Stone GW; Jeremias A
    EuroIntervention; 2023 Dec; 19(11):e903-e912. PubMed ID: 38031488
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Long-Term Clinical Outcomes of Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios: Resting Full-Cycle Ratio, Diastolic Pressure Ratio, and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio.
    Lee JM; Lee SH; Hwang D; Rhee TM; Choi KH; Kim J; Park J; Kim HY; Jung HW; Cho YK; Yoon HJ; Song YB; Hahn JY; Nam CW; Shin ES; Doh JH; Hur SH; Koo BK
    J Am Heart Assoc; 2020 Sep; 9(18):e016818. PubMed ID: 32914672
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Diagnostic performance of quantitative flow ratio in non-ST elevation acute coronary syndromes in comparison to non-hyperemic pressure ratios: a prospective study.
    Liontou C; Kalogera V; Oikonomou D; Stalikas D; Pappas L; Triantafyllou K
    Int J Cardiovasc Imaging; 2023 Dec; 39(12):2567-2574. PubMed ID: 37882959
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Discordance Between Resting and Hyperemic Indices of Coronary Stenosis Severity: The VERIFY 2 Study (A Comparative Study of Resting Coronary Pressure Gradient, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve in an Unselected Population Referred for Invasive Angiography).
    Hennigan B; Oldroyd KG; Berry C; Johnson N; McClure J; McCartney P; McEntegart MB; Eteiba H; Petrie MC; Rocchiccioli P; Good R; Lindsay MM; Hood S; Watkins S
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2016 Nov; 9(11):. PubMed ID: 27834663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Clinical Outcome of Lesions With Discordant Results Among Different Invasive Physiologic Indices　- Resting Distal Coronary to Aortic Pressure Ratio, Resting Full-Cycle Ratio, Diastolic Pressure Ratio, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio, and Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Lee JM; Rhee TM; Choi KH; Park J; Hwang D; Kim J; Park J; Kim HY; Jung HW; Cho YK; Yoon HJ; Song YB; Hahn JY; Nam CW; Shin ES; Doh JH; Hur SH; Koo BK
    Circ J; 2019 Oct; 83(11):2210-2221. PubMed ID: 31484836
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Diagnostic performances of Nonhyperemic Pressure Ratios and Coronary Angiography-Based Fractional Flow Reserve against conventional Wire-Based Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Li W; Takahashi T; Sehatbakhsh S; Parikh MA; Garcia-Garcia HM; Fearon WF; Kobayashi Y
    Coron Artery Dis; 2024 Mar; 35(2):83-91. PubMed ID: 38088790
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Fractional Flow Reserve and Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio as Predictors of the Placebo-Controlled Response to Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Stable Single-Vessel Coronary Artery Disease.
    Al-Lamee R; Howard JP; Shun-Shin MJ; Thompson D; Dehbi HM; Sen S; Nijjer S; Petraco R; Davies J; Keeble T; Tang K; Malik IS; Cook C; Ahmad Y; Sharp ASP; Gerber R; Baker C; Kaprielian R; Talwar S; Assomull R; Cole G; Keenan NG; Kanaganayagam G; Sehmi J; Wensel R; Harrell FE; Mayet J; Thom SA; Davies JE; Francis DP
    Circulation; 2018 Oct; 138(17):1780-1792. PubMed ID: 29789302
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Reclassification of Treatment Strategy With Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio and Fractional Flow Reserve: A Substudy From the iFR-SWEDEHEART Trial.
    Andell P; Berntorp K; Christiansen EH; Gudmundsdottir IJ; Sandhall L; Venetsanos D; Erlinge D; Fröbert O; Koul S; Reitan C; Götberg M
    JACC Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Oct; 11(20):2084-2094. PubMed ID: 30336812
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Validation of Resting Diastolic Pressure Ratio Calculated by a Novel Algorithm and Its Correlation With Distal Coronary Artery Pressure to Aortic Pressure, Instantaneous Wave-Free Ratio, and Fractional Flow Reserve.
    Ligthart J; Masdjedi K; Witberg K; Mastik F; van Zandvoort L; Lemmert ME; Wilschut J; Diletti R; de Jaegere P; Zijlstra F; Kardys I; Van Mieghem NM; Daemen J
    Circ Cardiovasc Interv; 2018 Dec; 11(12):e006911. PubMed ID: 30562091
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Non-hyperaemic pressure ratios to guide percutaneous coronary intervention.
    Michail M; Thakur U; Mehta O; Ramzy JM; Comella A; Ihdayhid AR; Cameron JD; Nicholls SJ; Hoole SP; Brown AJ
    Open Heart; 2020 Oct; 7(2):. PubMed ID: 33004619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 15.