These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

138 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33130132)

  • 21. Radiological adjacent-segment degeneration in L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison between dynamic stabilization and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Kuo CH; Huang WC; Wu JC; Tu TH; Fay LY; Wu CL; Cheng H
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2018 Sep; 29(3):250-258. PubMed ID: 29856306
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Analysis of Cost and 30-Day Outcomes in Single-Level Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Less Invasive, Stand-Alone Lateral Transpsoas Interbody Fusion.
    Hartman C; Hemphill C; Godzik J; Walker CT; Wewel JT; Turner JD; Uribe JS
    World Neurosurg; 2019 Feb; 122():e1037-e1040. PubMed ID: 30414525
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. TLIF for symptomatic disc degeneration: a retrospective study of 100 patients.
    Mura PP; Costaglioli M; Piredda M; Caboni S; Casula S
    Eur Spine J; 2011 May; 20 Suppl 1(Suppl 1):S57-60. PubMed ID: 21461695
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Long-term durability of minimal invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: a clinical and radiographic follow-up.
    Rouben D; Casnellie M; Ferguson M
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2011 Jul; 24(5):288-96. PubMed ID: 20975594
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Cost-effectiveness of minimally invasive versus open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for degenerative spondylolisthesis associated low-back and leg pain over two years.
    Parker SL; Adogwa O; Bydon A; Cheng J; McGirt MJ
    World Neurosurg; 2012 Jul; 78(1-2):178-84. PubMed ID: 22120269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. [Comparison of clinical efficacies of single segment transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with cage versus autogenous morselized bone for degenerative lumbar spinal stenosis: a prospective randomized controlled study].
    Liu P; Liu X; Qiao X; Du W; Luo D; Zheng X
    Zhonghua Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Sep; 94(35):2731-5. PubMed ID: 25533977
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Dynamic stabilization for L4-5 spondylolisthesis: comparison with minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with more than 2 years of follow-up.
    Kuo CH; Chang PY; Wu JC; Chang HK; Fay LY; Tu TH; Cheng H; Huang WC
    Neurosurg Focus; 2016 Jan; 40(1):E3. PubMed ID: 26721577
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. The surgical technique of minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Lawton CD; Smith ZA; Barnawi A; Fessler RG
    J Neurosurg Sci; 2011 Sep; 55(3):259-64. PubMed ID: 21968588
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Time Course Observation of Outcomes between Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion and Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Lin GX; Park CK; Hur JW; Kim JS
    Neurol Med Chir (Tokyo); 2019 Jun; 59(6):222-230. PubMed ID: 31068542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion with expandable versus static interbody devices: radiographic assessment of sagittal segmental and pelvic parameters.
    Hawasli AH; Khalifeh JM; Chatrath A; Yarbrough CK; Ray WZ
    Neurosurg Focus; 2017 Aug; 43(2):E10. PubMed ID: 28760032
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Comparison of adjacent segment disease after minimally invasive or open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion.
    Yee TJ; Terman SW; La Marca F; Park P
    J Clin Neurosci; 2014 Oct; 21(10):1796-801. PubMed ID: 24880486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Minimally invasive posterior transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion: One-year postoperative morbidity, clinical and radiological results of a prospective multicenter study of 182 cases.
    Giorgi H; Prébet R; Delhaye M; Aurouer N; Mangione P; Blondel B; Tropiano P; Fuentes S; Parent HF;
    Orthop Traumatol Surg Res; 2015 Oct; 101(6 Suppl):S241-5. PubMed ID: 26372185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Percutaneous endoscopic lumbar discectomy and minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for massive lumbar disc herniation.
    Liu C; Zhou Y
    Clin Neurol Neurosurg; 2019 Jan; 176():19-24. PubMed ID: 30476700
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Minimally invasive transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion (TLIF): technical feasibility and initial results.
    Schwender JD; Holly LT; Rouben DP; Foley KT
    J Spinal Disord Tech; 2005 Feb; 18 Suppl():S1-6. PubMed ID: 15699793
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Iliac Crest Bone Graft for Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Prospective Analysis of Inpatient Pain, Narcotics Consumption, and Costs.
    Haws BE; Khechen B; Narain AS; Hijji FY; Cardinal KL; Guntin JA; Singh K
    Spine (Phila Pa 1976); 2018 Sep; 43(18):1307-1312. PubMed ID: 29462060
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Reduced Acute Care Costs With the ERAS® Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion Compared With Conventional Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion.
    Wang MY; Chang HK; Grossman J
    Neurosurgery; 2018 Oct; 83(4):827-834. PubMed ID: 28945854
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Minimally invasive lateral interbody fusion for the treatment of rostral adjacent-segment lumbar degenerative stenosis without supplemental pedicle screw fixation.
    Wang MY; Vasudevan R; Mindea SA
    J Neurosurg Spine; 2014 Dec; 21(6):861-6. PubMed ID: 25303619
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Radiographic Analysis of One-level Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion (MI-TLIF) With Unilateral Pedicle Screw Fixation for Lumbar Degenerative Diseases.
    Shen X; Wang L; Zhang H; Gu X; Gu G; He S
    Clin Spine Surg; 2016 Feb; 29(1):E1-8. PubMed ID: 24189485
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Full-Endoscopic Posterior Lumbar Interbody Fusion Via an Interlaminar Approach Versus Minimally Invasive Transforaminal Lumbar Interbody Fusion: A Preliminary Retrospective Study.
    Li Y; Dai Y; Wang B; Li L; Li P; Xu J; Jiang B; Lü G
    World Neurosurg; 2020 Dec; 144():e475-e482. PubMed ID: 32891847
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Is minimally invasive superior than open transforaminal lumbar interbody fusion for single-level degenerative lumbar diseases: a meta-analysis.
    Li A; Li X; Zhong Y
    J Orthop Surg Res; 2018 Sep; 13(1):241. PubMed ID: 30236132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.