These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

89 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3313151)

  • 1. Spatial summation and the cortical magnification of perimetric profiles.
    Wild JM; Wood JM; Flanagan JG
    Ophthalmologica; 1987; 195(2):88-96. PubMed ID: 3313151
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. The cortical representation of gradient-adapted multiple-stimulus perimetry.
    Wild JM; Wood JM; Barnes DA
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 1986; 6(4):401-5. PubMed ID: 3627801
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Perimetric profiles and cortical representation.
    Wood JM; Wild JM; Drasdo N; Crews SJ
    Ophthalmic Res; 1986; 18(5):301-8. PubMed ID: 3808596
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A cortical pooling model of spatial summation for perimetric stimuli.
    Pan F; Swanson WH
    J Vis; 2006 Oct; 6(11):1159-71. PubMed ID: 17209726
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatiotemporal summation of perimetric stimuli in healthy observers.
    Montesano G; Mulholland PJ; Garway-Heath DF; Evans J; Ometto G; Crabb DP
    J Vis; 2023 Apr; 23(4):2. PubMed ID: 37014658
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Some concepts on the use of three-dimensional isometric plots for the representation of differential sensitivity.
    Wild JM; Wood JM; Worthington FM; Crews SJ
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1987 Apr; 65(4):423-32. PubMed ID: 3319465
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Investigating the linkage between mesopic spatial summation and variations in retinal ganglion cell density across the central visual field.
    Hunter AML; Anderson RS; Redmond T; Garway-Heath DF; Mulholland PJ
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2023 Sep; 43(5):1179-1189. PubMed ID: 37118942
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Do Intense Perimetric Stimuli Saturate the Healthy Visual System?
    Anderson AJ; McKendrick AM; Turpin A
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2016 Nov; 57(14):6397-6404. PubMed ID: 27893100
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Cortical magnification factor and contrast sensitivity to luminance-modulated chromatic gratings.
    Rovamo J
    Acta Physiol Scand; 1983 Dec; 119(4):365-71. PubMed ID: 6666617
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Standard Automated Perimetry: Determining Spatial Summation and Its Effect on Contrast Sensitivity Across the Visual Field.
    Khuu SK; Kalloniatis M
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Jun; 56(6):3565-76. PubMed ID: 26047043
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Scaling the structure--function relationship for clinical perimetry.
    Harwerth RS; Carter-Dawson L; Smith EL; Crawford ML
    Acta Ophthalmol Scand; 2005 Aug; 83(4):448-55. PubMed ID: 16029269
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Stimulus configuration and the format of the normal sensitivity gradient.
    Flanagan JG; Wild JM; Wood JM
    Doc Ophthalmol; 1988 Aug; 69(4):371-83. PubMed ID: 3060338
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The Effect of Age on the Temporal Summation of Achromatic Perimetric Stimuli.
    Mulholland PJ; Redmond T; Garway-Heath DF; Zlatkova MB; Anderson RS
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2015 Oct; 56(11):6467-72. PubMed ID: 26447980
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Assessing spatial and temporal properties of perimetric stimuli for resistance to clinical variations in retinal illumination.
    Swanson WH; Dul MW; Horner DG; Liu T; Tran I
    Invest Ophthalmol Vis Sci; 2014 Jan; 55(1):353-9. PubMed ID: 24370832
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Equating spatial summation in visual field testing reveals greater loss in optic nerve disease.
    Kalloniatis M; Khuu SK
    Ophthalmic Physiol Opt; 2016 Jul; 36(4):439-52. PubMed ID: 27197562
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Linearity can account for the similarity among conventional, frequency-doubling, and gabor-based perimetric tests in the glaucomatous macula.
    Sun H; Dul MW; Swanson WH
    Optom Vis Sci; 2006 Jul; 83(7):455-65. PubMed ID: 16840860
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Spatial scaling factors explain eccentricity effects on face ERPs.
    Rousselet GA; Husk JS; Bennett PJ; Sekuler AB
    J Vis; 2005 Nov; 5(10):755-63. PubMed ID: 16441183
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Dissociation of summation and peak latencies in visual processing: an MEG study on stimulus eccentricity.
    Zhou B; Bao Y; Sander T; Trahms L; Pöppel E
    Neurosci Lett; 2010 Oct; 483(2):101-4. PubMed ID: 20674677
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Evaluation of stimulus velocity in automated kinetic perimetry in young healthy participants.
    Hirasawa K; Shoji N; Okada A; Takano K; Tomioka S
    Vision Res; 2014 May; 98():83-8. PubMed ID: 24705075
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Parallel rarebits: a novel, large-scale visual field screening method.
    Lin SR; Fijalkowski N; Lin BR; Li F; Singh K; Chang RT
    Clin Exp Optom; 2014 Nov; 97(6):528-33. PubMed ID: 25331077
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 5.