These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

109 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3313154)

  • 1. Influence of geometric distortion and exposure parameters on sensitivity of digital subtraction radiography.
    Rudolph DJ; White SC; Mankovich NJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1987 Nov; 64(5):631-7. PubMed ID: 3313154
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Comparison of conventional and TACT (Tuned Aperture Computed Tomography) digital subtraction radiography in detection of pericrestal bone-gain.
    Chai-U-Dom O; Ludlow JB; Tyndall DA; Webber RL
    J Periodontal Res; 2002 Apr; 37(2):147-53. PubMed ID: 12009184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Clinical validation of a new subtraction radiography technique for periodontal bone loss detection.
    Nummikoski PV; Steffensen B; Hamilton K; Dove SB
    J Periodontol; 2000 Apr; 71(4):598-605. PubMed ID: 10807124
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Assessment of three methods of geometric image reconstruction for digital subtraction radiography.
    Queiroz PM; Oliveira ML; Tanaka JL; Soares MG; Haiter-Neto F; Ono E
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2016; 45(7):20160120. PubMed ID: 27376702
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Computer-assisted subtraction radiography in periodontal diagnosis.
    Gröndahl K
    Swed Dent J Suppl; 1987; 50():1-44. PubMed ID: 3321498
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Film-holding instruments for intraoral subtraction radiography.
    Rudolph DJ; White SC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1988 Jun; 65(6):767-72. PubMed ID: 3041341
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Digital subtraction radiography for detecting cortical and cancellous bone changes in the periapical region.
    Tyndall DA; Kapa SF; Bagnell CP
    J Endod; 1990 Apr; 16(4):173-8. PubMed ID: 2074408
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Contrast enhancement as an aid to interpretation in digital subtraction radiography.
    Reddy MS; Bruch JM; Jeffcoat MK; Williams RC
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Jun; 71(6):763-9. PubMed ID: 2062529
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Assessment of external root resorption using digital subtraction radiography.
    Kravitz LH; Tyndall DA; Bagnell CP; Dove SB
    J Endod; 1992 Jun; 18(6):275-84. PubMed ID: 1402585
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Dual-energy subtraction mammography.
    Asaga T; Masuzawa C; Yoshida A; Matsuura H
    J Digit Imaging; 1995 Feb; 8(1 Suppl 1):70-3. PubMed ID: 7734544
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Color conversion of alveolar bone density changes in digital subtraction images.
    Brägger U; Pasquali L
    J Clin Periodontol; 1989 Apr; 16(4):209-14. PubMed ID: 2654196
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Diagnosis of alveolar bone changes with digital subtraction images and conventional radiographs. An in vitro study.
    Nicopoulou-Karayianni K; Brägger U; Bürgin W; Nielsen PM; Lang NP
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1991 Aug; 72(2):251-6. PubMed ID: 1923405
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Determination of the optimal conditions for dental subtraction radiography using a storage phosphor system.
    Brettle DS; Ellwood R; Davies R
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1999 Jan; 28(1):1-5. PubMed ID: 10202471
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Measurement accuracy: a comparison of two intra-oral digital radiographic systems, RadioVisiography-S and FlashDent, with analog film.
    Scarfe WC; Norton S; Farman AG
    Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 1995 Nov; 24(4):215-20. PubMed ID: 9161164
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Calibration errors in digital subtraction radiography.
    Webber RL; Ruttimann UE; Heaven TJ
    J Periodontal Res; 1990 Sep; 25(5):268-75. PubMed ID: 2145412
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Semiautomated image registration for digital subtraction radiography.
    Byrd V; Mayfield-Donahoo T; Reddy MS; Jeffcoat MK
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 1998 Apr; 85(4):473-8. PubMed ID: 9574960
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Assessing condylar changes with digital subtraction radiography.
    Kapa SF; Tyndall DA; Zullo TG; Bagnell CR
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol; 1993 Feb; 75(2):247-52. PubMed ID: 8426725
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Optimal exposure parameters for digital radiography of the infant skull: a pilot study.
    Offiah AC; Grehan J; Hall CM; Todd-Pokropek A
    Clin Radiol; 2005 Nov; 60(11):1195-204. PubMed ID: 16223616
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Development and evaluation of digital subtraction radiography computer program.
    Lee SS; Huh YJ; Kim KY; Heo MS; Choi SC; Koak JY; Heo SJ; Han CH; Yi WJ
    Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod; 2004 Oct; 98(4):471-5. PubMed ID: 15472663
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Contrast matching techniques for digital subtraction radiography: an objective evaluation.
    Likar B; Bernard R; Pernus F
    Proc AMIA Annu Fall Symp; 1996; ():294-8. PubMed ID: 8947675
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.