BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

122 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33133277)

  • 1. Screening Strategy Modification Based on Personalized Breast Cancer Risk Stratification and its Implementation in the National Guidelines - Pilot Study.
    Krajc M; Gareth Evans D; Blatnik A; Lokar K; Žagar T; Tomšič S; Žgajnar J; Zadnik V
    Zdr Varst; 2020 Dec; 59(4):211-218. PubMed ID: 33133277
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Breast cancer risk assessment and risk distribution in 3,491 Slovenian women invited for screening at the age of 50; a population-based cross-sectional study.
    Jarm K; Zadnik V; Birk M; Vrhovec M; Hertl K; Klanecek Z; Studen A; Sval C; Krajc M
    Radiol Oncol; 2023 Sep; 57(3):337-347. PubMed ID: 37665745
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Breast cancer risk prediction using Tyrer-Cuzick algorithm with an 18-SNPs polygenic risk score in a European population with below-average breast cancer incidence.
    Oblak T; Škerl P; Narang BJ; Blagus R; Krajc M; Novaković S; Žgajnar J
    Breast; 2023 Dec; 72():103590. PubMed ID: 37857130
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Breast cancer risk based on adapted IBIS prediction model in Slovenian women aged 40-49 years - could it be better?
    Oblak T; Zadnik V; Krajc M; Lokar K; Zgajnar J
    Radiol Oncol; 2020 Jul; 54(3):335-340. PubMed ID: 32614783
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Performance of the IBIS/Tyrer-Cuzick model of breast cancer risk by race and ethnicity in the Women's Health Initiative.
    Kurian AW; Hughes E; Simmons T; Bernhisel R; Probst B; Meek S; Caswell-Jin JL; John EM; Lanchbury JS; Slavin TP; Wagner S; Gutin A; Rohan TE; Shadyab AH; Manson JE; Lane D; Chlebowski RT; Stefanick ML
    Cancer; 2021 Oct; 127(20):3742-3750. PubMed ID: 34228814
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Estimating the Cost of 3 Risk Prediction Strategies for Potential Use in the United Kingdom National Breast Screening Program.
    Wright SJ; Eden M; Ruane H; Byers H; Evans DG; Harvie M; Howell SJ; Howell A; French D; Payne K
    MDM Policy Pract; 2023; 8(1):23814683231171363. PubMed ID: 37152662
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Breast cancer risk assessment across the risk continuum: genetic and nongenetic risk factors contributing to differential model performance.
    Quante AS; Whittemore AS; Shriver T; Strauch K; Terry MB
    Breast Cancer Res; 2012 Nov; 14(6):R144. PubMed ID: 23127309
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Practical problems with clinical guidelines for breast cancer prevention based on remaining lifetime risk.
    Quante AS; Whittemore AS; Shriver T; Hopper JL; Strauch K; Terry MB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2015 Jul; 107(7):. PubMed ID: 25956172
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. An integrated breast cancer risk assessment and management model based on fuzzy cognitive maps.
    Subramanian J; Karmegam A; Papageorgiou E; Papandrianos N; Vasukie A
    Comput Methods Programs Biomed; 2015 Mar; 118(3):280-97. PubMed ID: 25697987
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The impact of using weight estimated from mammographic images
    Nair KP; Harkness EF; Gadde S; Lim YY; Maxwell AJ; Moschidis E; Foden P; Cuzick J; Brentnall A; Evans DG; Howell A; Astley SM
    Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng; 2017 Mar; 10134():. PubMed ID: 34925706
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Integrating Clinical and Polygenic Factors to Predict Breast Cancer Risk in Women Undergoing Genetic Testing.
    Hughes E; Tshiaba P; Wagner S; Judkins T; Rosenthal E; Roa B; Gallagher S; Meek S; Dalton K; Hedegard W; Adami CA; Grear DF; Domchek SM; Garber J; Lancaster JM; Weitzel JN; Kurian AW; Lanchbury JS; Gutin A; Robson ME
    JCO Precis Oncol; 2021; 5():. PubMed ID: 34036224
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Performance of the Gail and Tyrer-Cuzick breast cancer risk assessment models in women screened in a primary care setting with the FHS-7 questionnaire.
    Vianna FSL; Giacomazzi J; Oliveira Netto CB; Nunes LN; Caleffi M; Ashton-Prolla P; Camey SA
    Genet Mol Biol; 2019; 42(1 suppl 1):232-237. PubMed ID: 31170278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A Case-Control Study to Add Volumetric or Clinical Mammographic Density into the Tyrer-Cuzick Breast Cancer Risk Model.
    Brentnall AR; Cohn WF; Knaus WA; Yaffe MJ; Cuzick J; Harvey JA
    J Breast Imaging; 2019 Jun; 1(2):99-106. PubMed ID: 31423486
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. 10-year performance of four models of breast cancer risk: a validation study.
    Terry MB; Liao Y; Whittemore AS; Leoce N; Buchsbaum R; Zeinomar N; Dite GS; Chung WK; Knight JA; Southey MC; Milne RL; Goldgar D; Giles GG; McLachlan SA; Friedlander ML; Weideman PC; Glendon G; Nesci S; Andrulis IL; John EM; Phillips KA; Daly MB; Buys SS; Hopper JL; MacInnis RJ
    Lancet Oncol; 2019 Apr; 20(4):504-517. PubMed ID: 30799262
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Validation of the International Breast Cancer Intervention Study (IBIS) model in the High Risk Ontario Breast Screening Program: A retrospective cohort study.
    Brooks JD; Mah A; Christensen RAG; Arneja J; Eisen A; Chiarelli AM
    Genet Med; 2023 Jun; 25(6):100820. PubMed ID: 36919844
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Breast cancer pathology and stage are better predicted by risk stratification models that include mammographic density and common genetic variants.
    Evans DGR; Harkness EF; Brentnall AR; van Veen EM; Astley SM; Byers H; Sampson S; Southworth J; Stavrinos P; Howell SJ; Maxwell AJ; Howell A; Newman WG; Cuzick J
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2019 Jul; 176(1):141-148. PubMed ID: 30941651
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Evaluation of the Tyrer-Cuzick (International Breast Cancer Intervention Study) model for breast cancer risk prediction in women with atypical hyperplasia.
    Boughey JC; Hartmann LC; Anderson SS; Degnim AC; Vierkant RA; Reynolds CA; Frost MH; Pankratz VS
    J Clin Oncol; 2010 Aug; 28(22):3591-6. PubMed ID: 20606088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Comparing 5-Year and Lifetime Risks of Breast Cancer using the Prospective Family Study Cohort.
    MacInnis RJ; Knight JA; Chung WK; Milne RL; Whittemore AS; Buchsbaum R; Liao Y; Zeinomar N; Dite GS; Southey MC; Goldgar D; Giles GG; Kurian AW; ; Andrulis IL; John EM; Daly MB; Buys SS; Phillips KA; Hopper JL; Terry MB
    J Natl Cancer Inst; 2021 Jun; 113(6):785-791. PubMed ID: 33301022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Breast cancer risk assessment in a mammography screening program and participation in the IBIS-II chemoprevention trial.
    Loehberg CR; Jud SM; Haeberle L; Heusinger K; Dilbat G; Hein A; Rauh C; Dall P; Rix N; Heinrich S; Buchholz S; Lex B; Reichler B; Adamietz B; Schulz-Wendtland R; Beckmann MW; Fasching PA
    Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2010 May; 121(1):101-10. PubMed ID: 20306293
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20.
    ; ; . PubMed ID:
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.