161 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33133663)
1. Comparison of ureteric stent removal procedures using reusable and single-use flexible cystoscopes following ureteroscopy and lasertripsy: a micro cost analysis.
Pietropaolo A; Hughes T; Tear L; Somani BK
Cent European J Urol; 2020; 73(3):342-348. PubMed ID: 33133663
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Single-Use Grasper Integrated Flexible Cystoscope for Stent Removal: A Micro-Costing Analysis-Based Comparison.
Beebe SC; Jenkins LC; Posid T; Knudsen BE; Sourial MW
J Endourol; 2020 Aug; 34(8):816-820. PubMed ID: 32600072
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
3. Single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal versus reusable instruments: a prospective, comparative study of functionality, risk of infection, and costs.
Oderda M; Asimakopoulos A; Batetta V; Bosio A; Dalmasso E; Morra I; Vercelli E; Gontero P
World J Urol; 2023 Nov; 41(11):3175-3180. PubMed ID: 37783843
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. The impact of single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal on hospital costs and work organization: A multicentric evaluation.
Oderda M; Amato A; de la Rosette J; Doizi S; Estrade V; Falcone M; Grey B; Knudsen B; Olsburgh J; Pietropaolo A; Rukin N; Sedigh O; Saeed A; Somani BK; Gontero P
Urologia; 2023 Nov; 90(4):670-677. PubMed ID: 37154464
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Outcomes and Cost Evaluation Related to a Single-Use, Disposable Ureteric Stent Removal System: a Systematic Review of the Literature.
Hughes T; Pietropaolo A; Jones P; Oderda M; Gontero P; Somani BK
Curr Urol Rep; 2021 Jun; 22(8):41. PubMed ID: 34128107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Single-Use Versus Reusable Cystoscope for Ureteral Stent Removal: A Comparative Study of Perceived Pain and Procedure Times.
Panach-Navarrete J; Lloret-Durà MA; Sánchez-Gimeno S; Murcia-Díez E; Martínez-Jabaloyas JM
Arch Esp Urol; 2023 Feb; 76(1):65-69. PubMed ID: 36914421
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. A micro-costing analysis of outpatient flexible cystoscopy: implications for adoption of single-use flexible cystoscopes.
Su ZT; Huang MM; Matlaga BR; Hutfless S; Koo K
World J Urol; 2021 Nov; 39(11):4275-4281. PubMed ID: 34019137
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The new grasper-integrated single use flexible cystoscope for double J stent removal: evaluation of image quality, flow and flexibility.
Talso M; Emiliani E; Baghdadi M; Orosa A; Servian P; Barreiro A; Proietti S; Traxer O
World J Urol; 2017 Aug; 35(8):1277-1283. PubMed ID: 27987031
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Efficacy of the novel, innovative, single-use grasper integrated flexible cystoscope for ureteral stent removal: a systematic review.
Adam A; Lawrentschuk N; Bhattu AS; Nagdee J
ANZ J Surg; 2021 Dec; 91(12):2599-2605. PubMed ID: 33991161
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Reusable vs. single-use cystoscope for removal of double-j stent: a prospective randomized comparison and cost analysis.
Alkhamees M; Alothman A; Alzughaibi M; AlAsker A; Ghazwani Y; Masuadi E; Alshohayeb I; Hamri SB
Eur Rev Med Pharmacol Sci; 2022 Jun; 26(12):4268-4273. PubMed ID: 35776026
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Cost-effectiveness analysis of a single-use digital flexible cystoscope for double J removal.
Oderda M; Antolini J; Falcone M; Lacquaniti S; Fasolis G
Urologia; 2020 Feb; 87(1):29-34. PubMed ID: 31282294
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Environmental Impact of Flexible Cystoscopy: A Comparative Analysis Between Carbon Footprint of Isiris
Jahrreiss V; Sarrot P; Davis NF; Somani B
J Endourol; 2024 Apr; 38(4):386-394. PubMed ID: 38185843
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
13. Cost and Environmental Impact of Disposable Flexible Cystoscopes Compared to Reusable Devices.
Boucheron T; Lechevallier E; Gondran-Tellier B; Michel F; Bastide C; Martin N; Baboudjian M
J Endourol; 2022 Oct; 36(10):1317-1321. PubMed ID: 35703325
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Impact of ureteric stent removal by string on patient's quality of life and on complications at post-ureteroscopy for urolithiasis: a controlled trial.
Inoue T; Okada S; Hamamoto S; Yoshida T; Murota T; Matsuda T;
BJU Int; 2019 Aug; 124(2):314-320. PubMed ID: 30447045
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Disposable Cystoscopes Do Not Decrease Post Renal Transplant Stent Removal Symptomatic Infection Rates.
Qosja N; Geldmaker LE; Tiwari V; Fuqua TR; Baird BA; Haehn DA; Ball CT; Wadei HM; Thiel DD
Urology; 2024 Jun; ():. PubMed ID: 38908562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. A prospective and randomized comparison of rigid ureteroscopic to flexible cystoscopic retrieval of ureteral stents.
Lai D; Chen M; Zha S; Wan S
BMC Urol; 2017 Apr; 17(1):31. PubMed ID: 28431538
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Prospective Randomized Trial of Single-Use
Johnson BA; Raman JD; Best SL; Lotan Y
J Endourol; 2023 Oct; 37(10):1139-1144. PubMed ID: 37565290
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
18. The grasper-integrated disposable flexible cystoscope is comparable to the reusable, flexible cystoscope for the detection of bladder cancer.
Seyam RM; Zeitouni OM; Alsibai TM; AlAyoub AJ; Al-Qassab OM; AlDeiry MA; Zino AO; Hulwi HS; Mokhtar AA; Shahbaz M; Junejo NN; Alotaibi MF; Alzahrani HM; Alothman KI; Alkhateeb SS; Al-Hussain TO; Altaweel WM
Sci Rep; 2020 Aug; 10(1):13495. PubMed ID: 32778771
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Micro-cost analysis of single-use vs. reusable cystoscopy in a single-payer healthcare system.
Kim J; Gao B; Bhojani N; Zorn KC; Chughtai B; Elterman DS
Can Urol Assoc J; 2022 Oct; 16(10):346-350. PubMed ID: 35621291
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Disposable versus Reusable Cystoscopes: A Micro-Costing Value Analysis in High-Volume and Low-Volume Urology Practices.
Young JA; Garden EB; Al-Alao O; Deoraj D; Small AC; Hruby G; Grotas AB; Palese MA
Urol Pract; 2021 Jul; 8(4):466-471. PubMed ID: 37145468
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
