These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

179 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33134389)

  • 1. Monolithic and Minimally Veneered Zirconia Complications as Implant-Supported Restorative Material: A Retrospective Clinical Study up to 5 Years.
    Diéguez-Pereira M; Chávarri-Prado D; Estrada-Martínez A; Pérez-Pevida E; Brizuela-Velasco A
    Biomed Res Int; 2020; 2020():8821068. PubMed ID: 33134389
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Prosthetic complications with monolithic or micro-veneered implant-supported zirconia single-unit, multiple-unit, and complete-arch prostheses on titanium base abutments: A single center retrospective study with mean follow-up period of 72.35 months.
    Saponaro PC; Karasan D; Donmez MB; Johnston WM; Yilmaz B
    Clin Implant Dent Relat Res; 2023 Feb; 25(1):99-106. PubMed ID: 36321480
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Screw-retained ceramic-veneered/monolithic zirconia partial implant-supported fixed dental prostheses: A 5 to 10-year retrospective study on survival and complications.
    Zhang Y; Luo J; Di P; Chen B; Li J; Yu Z; Lin Y
    J Prosthodont; 2024 Mar; 33(3):221-230. PubMed ID: 37302066
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Rehabilitation of edentulous jaws with zirconia complete-arch fixed implant-supported prostheses: An up to 4-year retrospective clinical study.
    Tischler M; Patch C; Bidra AS
    J Prosthet Dent; 2018 Aug; 120(2):204-209. PubMed ID: 29559219
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. A systematic review and meta-analysis evaluating the survival, the failure, and the complication rates of veneered and monolithic all-ceramic implant-supported single crowns.
    Pjetursson BE; Sailer I; Latyshev A; Rabel K; Kohal RJ; Karasan D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2021 Oct; 32 Suppl 21(Suppl 21):254-288. PubMed ID: 34642991
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Consecutive case series of monolithic and minimally veneered zirconia restorations on teeth and implants: up to 68 months.
    Moscovitch M
    Int J Periodontics Restorative Dent; 2015; 35(3):315-23. PubMed ID: 25909519
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns Supported by Narrow or Standard Diameter Titanium-zirconium Implants in Posterior Sites: One-year Results of a Randomized Controlled Trial.
    Alsabeeha NHM; Amir-Rad F; Ma S; Shah M; Hannawi H; Tawse-Smith A; Duncan WJ; Baqain ZH; Atieh MA
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2024 May; 0(0):1-23. PubMed ID: 38728047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Systematic review evaluating the influence of the prosthetic material and prosthetic design on the clinical outcomes of implant-supported multi-unit fixed dental prosthesis in the posterior area.
    Pjetursson BE; Sailer I; Merino-Higuera E; Spies BC; Burkhardt F; Karasan D
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2023 Sep; 34 Suppl 26():86-103. PubMed ID: 37750526
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Monolithic Lithium Disilicate Full-Contour Crowns Bonded on CAD/CAM Zirconia Complete-Arch Implant Bridges With 3 to 5 Years of Follow-Up.
    Pozzi A; Tallarico M; Barlattani A
    J Oral Implantol; 2015 Aug; 41(4):450-8. PubMed ID: 24188105
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Full-arch implant-supported rehabilitations: A prospective study comparing porcelain-veneered zirconia frameworks to monolithic zirconia.
    Caramês J; Marques D; Malta Barbosa J; Moreira A; Crispim P; Chen A
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2019 Jan; 30(1):68-78. PubMed ID: 30521106
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Ceramic-Veneered Zirconia Frameworks in Full-Arch Implant Rehabilitations: A 6-Month to 5-Year Retrospective Cohort Study.
    Mendez Caramês JM; Sola Pereira da Mata AD; da Silva Marques DN; de Oliveira Francisco HC
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2016; 31(6):1407-1414. PubMed ID: 27861668
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Metal-free materials for fixed prosthodontic restorations.
    Poggio CE; Ercoli C; Rispoli L; Maiorana C; Esposito M
    Cochrane Database Syst Rev; 2017 Dec; 12(12):CD009606. PubMed ID: 29261853
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. A systematic review of the survival and complication rates of zirconia-ceramic and metal-ceramic multiple-unit fixed dental prostheses.
    Sailer I; Strasding M; Valente NA; Zwahlen M; Liu S; Pjetursson BE
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2018 Oct; 29 Suppl 16():184-198. PubMed ID: 30328185
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Short-term complications of implant-supported and combined tooth-implant-supported fixed dental prostheses.
    Rammelsberg P; Schwarz S; Schroeder C; Bermejo JL; Gabbert O
    Clin Oral Implants Res; 2013 Jul; 24(7):758-62. PubMed ID: 22568699
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Digital workflow in full-arch implant rehabilitation with segmented minimally veneered monolithic zirconia fixed dental prostheses: 2-year clinical follow-up.
    Papaspyridakos P; Kang K; DeFuria C; Amin S; Kudara Y; Weber HP
    J Esthet Restor Dent; 2018 Jan; 30(1):5-13. PubMed ID: 28792115
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Complications and patient-centered outcomes with an implant-supported monolithic zirconia fixed dental prosthesis: 1 year results.
    Limmer B; Sanders AE; Reside G; Cooper LF
    J Prosthodont; 2014 Jun; 23(4):267-75. PubMed ID: 24393461
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Retrospective Cohort Evaluation of Full-Arch Zirconia Implant-Supported Fixed Prostheses.
    Al-Tarawneh S; Thalji G; Shonberg D; Fayz L; Cooper L
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Implants; 2023; 38(2):381-390. PubMed ID: 37083903
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. EAO Position Paper: Material Selection for Implant-Supported Restorations.
    Pjetursson BE; Fehmer V; Sailer I
    Int J Prosthodont; 2022; 35(1):7-16. PubMed ID: 35230351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Has zirconia made a material difference in implant prosthodontics? A review.
    Sadowsky SJ
    Dent Mater; 2020 Jan; 36(1):1-8. PubMed ID: 31500904
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Clinical Results and Technical Complications of Posterior Implant-Supported Modified Monolithic Zirconia Single Crowns and Short-Span Fixed Dental Prostheses: A 2-Year Pilot Study.
    Cheng CW; Chien CH; Chen CJ; Papaspyridakos P
    J Prosthodont; 2018 Feb; 27(2):108-114. PubMed ID: 29086467
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 9.