165 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33134390)
21. Proteomic profiling of triple-negative breast carcinomas in combination with a three-tier orthogonal technology approach identifies Mage-A4 as potential therapeutic target in estrogen receptor negative breast cancer.
Cabezón T; Gromova I; Gromov P; Serizawa R; Timmermans Wielenga V; Kroman N; Celis JE; Moreira JM
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2013 Feb; 12(2):381-94. PubMed ID: 23172894
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Risk and prognostic factors of breast cancer with liver metastases.
Ji L; Cheng L; Zhu X; Gao Y; Fan L; Wang Z
BMC Cancer; 2021 Mar; 21(1):238. PubMed ID: 33676449
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. Luminal subtypes predict improved survival following central nervous system metastasis in patients with surgically managed metastatic breast carcinoma.
Wiens AL; Martin SE; Bertsch EC; Vance GH; Stohler RA; Cheng L; Badve S; Hattab EM
Arch Pathol Lab Med; 2014 Feb; 138(2):175-81. PubMed ID: 24476516
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. New developments in breast cancer prognosis: molecular predictors of treatment response and survival.
Foo EM; Boost MV; Wong AS; Loo WT; Chow LW; Chow CY
Int J Biol Markers; 2013 Jun; 28(2):131-40. PubMed ID: 23709349
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Prognostic Factors for Luminal B-like Breast Cancer.
Ding NH; Liu CF; Hu C; Yuan JQ; Liao WH; Xiao Z
Curr Med Sci; 2019 Jun; 39(3):396-402. PubMed ID: 31209809
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Triple-negative breast cancer and poly(ADP-ribose) polymerase inhibitors.
Park Y; Moriyama A; Kitahara T; Yoshida Y; Urita T; Kato R
Anticancer Agents Med Chem; 2012 Jul; 12(6):672-7. PubMed ID: 22263793
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Histological grade provides significant prognostic information in addition to breast cancer subtypes defined according to St Gallen 2013.
Ehinger A; Malmström P; Bendahl PO; Elston CW; Falck AK; Forsare C; Grabau D; Rydén L; Stål O; Fernö M;
Acta Oncol; 2017 Jan; 56(1):68-74. PubMed ID: 27762648
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Stage IV breast cancer: a population-based study about prognostic factors according to HER2 and HR status.
Bertaut A; Mounier M; Desmoulins I; Guiu S; Beltjens F; Darut-Jouve A; Ponnelle T; Arnould L; Arveux P
Eur J Cancer Care (Engl); 2015 Nov; 24(6):920-8. PubMed ID: 25757548
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Factors influencing the hormone receptor and HER2 levels in breast cancer: a population-based analysis.
Tas F
Onkologie; 2012; 35(3):95-8. PubMed ID: 22414972
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Upregulated WTAP expression appears to both promote breast cancer growth and inhibit lymph node metastasis.
Wang CQ; Tang CH; Wang Y; Huang BF; Hu GN; Wang Q; Shao JK
Sci Rep; 2022 Jan; 12(1):1023. PubMed ID: 35046505
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Prognostic values of negative estrogen or progesterone receptor expression in patients with luminal B HER2-negative breast cancer.
Park C; Park K; Kim J; Sin Y; Park I; Cho H; Yang K; Bae BN; Kim KW; Ahn S; Gwak G
World J Surg Oncol; 2016 Sep; 14(1):244. PubMed ID: 27619909
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Prediction of Recurrence and Survival for Triple-Negative Breast Cancer (TNBC) by a Protein Signature in Tissue Samples.
Campone M; Valo I; Jézéquel P; Moreau M; Boissard A; Campion L; Loussouarn D; Verriele V; Coqueret O; Guette C
Mol Cell Proteomics; 2015 Nov; 14(11):2936-46. PubMed ID: 26209610
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Interleukin 8 in progression of hormone-dependent early breast cancer.
Milovanovic J; Todorovic-Rakovic N; Vujasinovic T; Abu Rabi Z
J Biosci; 2017 Jun; 42(2):265-274. PubMed ID: 28569250
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
34. Correlation between p53 and epidermal growth factor receptor expression in breast cancer classification.
Wang XZ; Liu Q; Sun JJ; Zuo WS; Hu DW; Ma SG; Mu DB; Yu ZY
Genet Mol Res; 2015 Apr; 14(2):4282-90. PubMed ID: 25966200
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Triple-negative phenotype is of adverse prognostic value in patients treated with dose-dense sequential adjuvant chemotherapy: a translational research analysis in the context of a Hellenic Cooperative Oncology Group (HeCOG) randomized phase III trial.
Skarlos P; Christodoulou C; Kalogeras KT; Eleftheraki AG; Bobos M; Batistatou A; Valavanis C; Tzaida O; Timotheadou E; Kronenwett R; Wirtz RM; Kostopoulos I; Televantou D; Koutselini E; Papaspirou I; Papadimitriou CA; Pectasides D; Gogas H; Aravantinos G; Pavlidis N; Arapantoni P; Skarlos DV; Fountzilas G
Cancer Chemother Pharmacol; 2012 Feb; 69(2):533-46. PubMed ID: 21901395
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Clinical subtypes and prognosis of pregnancy-associated breast cancer: results from the Korean Breast Cancer Society Registry database.
Bae SY; Kim SJ; Lee J; Lee ES; Kim EK; Park HY; Suh YJ; Kim HK; You JY; Jung SP
Breast Cancer Res Treat; 2018 Nov; 172(1):113-121. PubMed ID: 30088177
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Lapatinib combined with letrozole versus letrozole and placebo as first-line therapy for postmenopausal hormone receptor-positive metastatic breast cancer.
Johnston S; Pippen J; Pivot X; Lichinitser M; Sadeghi S; Dieras V; Gomez HL; Romieu G; Manikhas A; Kennedy MJ; Press MF; Maltzman J; Florance A; O'Rourke L; Oliva C; Stein S; Pegram M
J Clin Oncol; 2009 Nov; 27(33):5538-46. PubMed ID: 19786658
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Everolimus plus Exemestane for Hormone Receptor-Positive Advanced Breast Cancer: A PAM50 Intrinsic Subtype Analysis of BOLERO-2.
Prat A; Brase JC; Cheng Y; Nuciforo P; Paré L; Pascual T; Martínez D; Galván P; Vidal M; Adamo B; Hortobagyi GN; Baselga J; Ciruelos E
Oncologist; 2019 Jul; 24(7):893-900. PubMed ID: 30679318
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Vimentin as a poor prognostic factor for triple-negative breast cancer.
Yamashita N; Tokunaga E; Kitao H; Hisamatsu Y; Taketani K; Akiyoshi S; Okada S; Aishima S; Morita M; Maehara Y
J Cancer Res Clin Oncol; 2013 May; 139(5):739-46. PubMed ID: 23354842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Characterization of breast cancer subtypes by quantitative assessment of biological parameters: relationship with clinicopathological characteristics, biological features and prognosis.
Del Casar JM; Martín A; García C; Corte MD; Alvarez A; Junquera S; González LO; Bongera M; García-Muñiz JL; Allende MT; Vizoso F
Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol; 2008 Dec; 141(2):147-52. PubMed ID: 18768247
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
