232 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33134830)
1. Systematic Review and STARD Scoring of Renal Cell Carcinoma Circulating Diagnostic Biomarker Manuscripts.
Iafolla MAJ; Picardo S; Aung K; Hansen AR
JNCI Cancer Spectr; 2020 Oct; 4(5):pkaa050. PubMed ID: 33134830
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Systematic review and REMARK scoring of renal cell carcinoma prognostic circulating biomarker manuscripts.
Iafolla MAJ; Picardo S; Aung K; Hansen AR
PLoS One; 2019; 14(10):e0222359. PubMed ID: 31639128
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies on pelvic floor three-dimensional transperineal ultrasound: a systematic review.
Grob ATM; van der Vaart LR; Withagen MIJ; van der Vaart CH
Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol; 2017 Oct; 50(4):451-457. PubMed ID: 28000958
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Diagnostic DNA Methylation Biomarkers for Renal Cell Carcinoma: A Systematic Review.
Lommen K; Vaes N; Aarts MJ; van Roermund JG; Schouten LJ; Oosterwijk E; Melotte V; Tjan-Heijnen VC; van Engeland M; Smits KM
Eur Urol Oncol; 2021 Apr; 4(2):215-226. PubMed ID: 31402218
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Quality and reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in TB, HIV and malaria: evaluation using QUADAS and STARD standards.
Fontela PS; Pant Pai N; Schiller I; Dendukuri N; Ramsay A; Pai M
PLoS One; 2009 Nov; 4(11):e7753. PubMed ID: 19915664
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Emergency Ultrasound Literature and Adherence to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Criteria.
Thiessen M; Vogel JA; Byyny RL; Hopkins E; Haukoos JS; Kendall JL; Trent SA
J Emerg Med; 2020 Apr; 58(4):636-646. PubMed ID: 31708317
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Has the quality of reporting improved since it became mandatory to use the Standards for Reporting Diagnostic Accuracy?
Stahl AC; Tietz AS; Dewey M; Kendziora B
Insights Imaging; 2023 May; 14(1):85. PubMed ID: 37184759
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Quality of reporting of test accuracy studies in reproductive medicine: impact of the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) initiative.
Coppus SF; van der Veen F; Bossuyt PM; Mol BW
Fertil Steril; 2006 Nov; 86(5):1321-9. PubMed ID: 16978620
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in glaucoma using scanning laser polarimetry.
Paranjothy B; Shunmugam M; Azuara-Blanco A
J Glaucoma; 2007 Dec; 16(8):670-5. PubMed ID: 18091453
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies in diabetic retinopathy screening: a systematic review.
Zafar A; Khan GI; Siddiqui MA
Clin Exp Ophthalmol; 2008 Aug; 36(6):537-42. PubMed ID: 18954316
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Has the STARD statement improved the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies published in European Radiology?
Stahl AC; Tietz AS; Kendziora B; Dewey M
Eur Radiol; 2023 Jan; 33(1):97-105. PubMed ID: 35907025
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy (STARD) 2015 Guidelines in Acute Point-of-Care Ultrasound Research.
Prager R; Bowdridge J; Kareemi H; Wright C; McGrath TA; McInnes MDF
JAMA Netw Open; 2020 May; 3(5):e203871. PubMed ID: 32356885
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Reporting quality of diagnostic accuracy studies: a systematic review and meta-analysis of investigations on adherence to STARD.
Korevaar DA; van Enst WA; Spijker R; Bossuyt PM; Hooft L
Evid Based Med; 2014 Apr; 19(2):47-54. PubMed ID: 24368333
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Reitsma JB; Bossuyt PM; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
Radiology; 2005 May; 235(2):347-53. PubMed ID: 15770041
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Reproducibility of the STARD checklist: an instrument to assess the quality of reporting of diagnostic accuracy studies.
Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
BMC Med Res Methodol; 2006 Mar; 6():12. PubMed ID: 16539705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. The quality of diagnostic accuracy studies since the STARD statement: has it improved?
Smidt N; Rutjes AW; van der Windt DA; Ostelo RW; Bossuyt PM; Reitsma JB; Bouter LM; de Vet HC
Neurology; 2006 Sep; 67(5):792-7. PubMed ID: 16966539
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Indexing of diagnosis accuracy studies in MEDLINE and EMBASE.
Wilczynski NL; Haynes RB
AMIA Annu Symp Proc; 2007 Oct; 2007():801-5. PubMed ID: 18693947
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Adherence to the Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD): a survey of four journals in laboratory medicine.
Zheng FF; Shen WH; Gong F; Hu ZD; Lippi G; Šimundić AM; Bossuyt PMM; Plebani M; Zhang K
Ann Transl Med; 2021 Jun; 9(11):918. PubMed ID: 34350233
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Reporting Quality of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies in Laboratory Medicine: Adherence to Standards for Reporting of Diagnostic Accuracy Studies (STARD) 2015.
Jang MA; Kim B; Lee YK
Ann Lab Med; 2020 May; 40(3):245-252. PubMed ID: 31858765
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. The STARD statement for reporting diagnostic accuracy studies: application to the history and physical examination.
Simel DL; Rennie D; Bossuyt PM
J Gen Intern Med; 2008 Jun; 23(6):768-74. PubMed ID: 18347878
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
