These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

119 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3313486)

  • 21. Age-related slowing and the time course of semantic priming in visual word identification.
    Madden DJ; Pierce TW; Allen PA
    Psychol Aging; 1993 Dec; 8(4):490-507. PubMed ID: 8292278
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Predictors of semantic categorical flexibility in older adults.
    Maintenant C; Blaye A; Pennequin V; Paour JL
    Br J Psychol; 2013 May; 104(2):265-82. PubMed ID: 23560671
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Does the semantic content of verbal categories influence categorical perception? An ERP study.
    Maier M; Glage P; Hohlfeld A; Abdel Rahman R
    Brain Cogn; 2014 Nov; 91():1-10. PubMed ID: 25163810
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Colavita dominance effect revisited: the effect of semantic congruity.
    Stubblefield A; Jacobs LA; Kim Y; Goolkasian P
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2013 Nov; 75(8):1827-39. PubMed ID: 23943499
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Processing phonological and semantic ambiguity: evidence from semantic priming at different SOAs.
    Frost R; Bentin S
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 1992 Jan; 18(1):58-68. PubMed ID: 1532022
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Attention to Distinct Goal-relevant Features Differentially Guides Semantic Knowledge Retrieval.
    Hanson GK; Chrysikou EG
    J Cogn Neurosci; 2017 Jul; 29(7):1178-1193. PubMed ID: 28294713
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Semantic processing with bisensory stimulation.
    Lewis JL
    J Exp Psychol; 1972 Dec; 96(2):455-7. PubMed ID: 4645973
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Trial-by-trial adjustments in control triggered by incidentally encoded semantic cues.
    Blais C; Harris MB; Sinanian MH; Bunge SA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2015; 68(9):1920-30. PubMed ID: 25624095
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Heteromodal Cortical Areas Encode Sensory-Motor Features of Word Meaning.
    Fernandino L; Humphries CJ; Conant LL; Seidenberg MS; Binder JR
    J Neurosci; 2016 Sep; 36(38):9763-9. PubMed ID: 27656016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. The effects of ageing and visual noise on conceptual integration during sentence reading.
    Gao X; Levinthal BR; Stine-Morrow EA
    Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2012; 65(9):1833-47. PubMed ID: 22530620
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. Affective priming of nonaffective semantic categorization responses.
    Spruyt A; De Houwer J; Hermans D; Eelen P
    Exp Psychol; 2007; 54(1):44-53. PubMed ID: 17341014
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. What do graded effects of semantic transparency reveal about morphological processing?
    Feldman LB; Soltano EG; Pastizzo MJ; Francis SE
    Brain Lang; 2004; 90(1-3):17-30. PubMed ID: 15172521
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. Selective short-term memory deficits arise from impaired domain-general semantic control mechanisms.
    Hoffman P; Jefferies E; Ehsan S; Hopper S; Ralph MA
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2009 Jan; 35(1):137-56. PubMed ID: 19210086
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Ambiguity and synonymy effects in lexical decision, naming, and semantic categorization tasks: interactions between orthography, phonology, and semantics.
    Hino Y; Lupker SJ; Pexman PM
    J Exp Psychol Learn Mem Cogn; 2002 Jul; 28(4):686-713. PubMed ID: 12109762
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. The general/specific breakdown of semantic memory and the nature of superordinate knowledge: insights from superordinate and basic-level feature norms.
    Marques JF
    Cogn Neuropsychol; 2007 Dec; 24(8):879-903. PubMed ID: 18161500
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. Semantic congruity effects and theories of the comparison process.
    Petrusic WM
    J Exp Psychol Hum Percept Perform; 1992 Nov; 18(4):962-86. PubMed ID: 1431758
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. Symbolic control of visual attention: semantic constraints on the spatial distribution of attention.
    Gibson BS; Scheutz M; Davis GJ
    Atten Percept Psychophys; 2009 Feb; 71(2):363-74. PubMed ID: 19304625
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Organisation and evocation of the semantic knowledge: a non-abstractive approach.
    Atzeni T; Carbonnel S
    Brain Cogn; 2004 Jul; 55(2):237-9. PubMed ID: 15177786
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. Stimulus exposure time and perceptual memory.
    von Hippel W; Hawkins C
    Percept Psychophys; 1994 Nov; 56(5):525-35. PubMed ID: 7991350
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. I see/hear what you mean: semantic activation in visual word recognition depends on perceptual attention.
    Connell L; Lynott D
    J Exp Psychol Gen; 2014 Apr; 143(2):527-33. PubMed ID: 24099578
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.