155 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33135560)
1. Characterizing Current Attitudes and Practices for Human Subject Safety in Studies Involving Pupil Dilation.
Szpernal J; Carroll J; Spellecy R; Bachman Groth JA
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2021; 16(1-2):54-64. PubMed ID: 33135560
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. American Society of Clinical Oncology policy statement: oversight of clinical research.
American Society of Clinical Oncology
J Clin Oncol; 2003 Jun; 21(12):2377-86. PubMed ID: 12721281
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. A comparison of institutional review board professionals' and patients' views on consent for research on medical practices.
Kraft SA; Cho MK; Constantine M; Lee SS; Kelley M; Korngiebel D; James C; Kuwana E; Meyer A; Porter K; Diekema D; Capron AM; Alicic R; Wilfond BS; Magnus D
Clin Trials; 2016 Oct; 13(5):555-65. PubMed ID: 27257125
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Pupillary Dilation in Research: More than Meets the Eye.
Szpernal J; Bachman Groth JA; Wynne N; Williams V; Spellecy R; Thuruthumaly C; Carroll J
Curr Eye Res; 2022 Jul; 47(7):965-977. PubMed ID: 35499263
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
5. Institutional review boards as an instrument of assessment: research involving human subjects in the U.S.
Gray BH
Sci Technol Human Values; 1978; (25):. PubMed ID: 11663042
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
6. Researcher liability for negligence in human subject research: informed consent and researcher malpractice actions.
Jansson RL
Wash Law Rev; 2003 Feb; 78(1):229-63. PubMed ID: 15732212
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The Practice of Research Ethics in Lebanon and Qatar: Perspectives of Researchers on Informed Consent.
Nakkash R; Qutteina Y; Nasrallah C; Wright K; El-Alti L; Makhoul J; Al-Ali K
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2017 Dec; 12(5):352-362. PubMed ID: 28905673
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Moving Forward on Consent Practices in Australia.
McWhirter RE; Eckstein L
J Bioeth Inq; 2018 Jun; 15(2):243-257. PubMed ID: 29532387
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Updating protections for human subjects involved in research. Project on Informed Consent, Human Research Ethics Group.
Moreno J; Caplan AL; Wolpe PR
JAMA; 1998 Dec; 280(22):1951-8. PubMed ID: 9851484
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Common (mis)perceptions about IRB review of human subjects research.
Lynn MR; Nelson DK
Nurs Sci Q; 2005 Jul; 18(3):264-70. PubMed ID: 15976051
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Pupillary dilation: an eye-opening problem.
Classé JG
J Am Optom Assoc; 1992 Oct; 63(10):733-41. PubMed ID: 1430748
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Perspectives of IRB chairs on the informed consent process.
Kane EI; Gallo JJ
AJOB Empir Bioeth; 2017; 8(2):137-143. PubMed ID: 28949842
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. The crisis in local institutional review boards.
Sugar AM
Ann Intern Med; 2002 Mar; 136(5):410-1; author reply 410-1. PubMed ID: 11874319
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
14. Review by a local medical research ethics committee of the conduct of approved research projects, by examination of patients' case notes, consent forms, and research records and by interview.
Smith T; Moore EJ; Tunstall-Pedoe H
BMJ; 1997 May; 314(7094):1588-90. PubMed ID: 9169403
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. IRB Policies for Obtaining Informed Consent from Non-English-Speaking People.
McMillan G
Ethics Hum Res; 2020 May; 42(3):21-29. PubMed ID: 32421949
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Research involving human subjects.
Gray BH; Cooke RA; Tannenbaum AS
Science; 1978 Sep; 201(4361):1094-101. PubMed ID: 356268
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Limitations of informed consent for in utero gene transfer research: implications for investigators and institutional review boards.
Burger IM; Wilfond BS
Hum Gene Ther; 2000 May; 11(7):1057-63. PubMed ID: 10811234
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Research on Medical Practices (ROMP): Attitudes of IRB Personnel about Randomization and Informed Consent.
Porter KM; Cho MK; Kraft SA; Korngiebel DM; Constantine M; Lee SS; Kelley M; James C; Kuwana E; Meyer A; Diekema D; Capron AM; Magnus D; Wilfond BS
IRB; 2017; 39(1):10-6. PubMed ID: 30146866
[No Abstract] [Full Text] [Related]
19. Researchers' Perspectives on Informed Consent and Ethical Review of Biobank Research in South Africa: A Cross-Sectional Study.
Mwaka E; Horn L
J Empir Res Hum Res Ethics; 2019 Oct; 14(4):307-317. PubMed ID: 31378129
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Local Research Ethics Committees can audit ethical standards in research.
Berry J
J Med Ethics; 1997 Dec; 23(6):379-81. PubMed ID: 9451608
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
