These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. Chaperone-Bound Clients: The Importance of Being Dynamic. Hiller S Trends Biochem Sci; 2019 Jun; 44(6):517-527. PubMed ID: 30611607 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. A molecular mechanism of chaperone-client recognition. He L; Sharpe T; Mazur A; Hiller S Sci Adv; 2016 Nov; 2(11):e1601625. PubMed ID: 28138538 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Competition between protein folding and aggregation with molecular chaperones in crowded solutions: insight from mesoscopic simulations. Kinjo AR; Takada S Biophys J; 2003 Dec; 85(6):3521-31. PubMed ID: 14645047 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The interactions of molecular chaperones with client proteins: why are they so weak? Arhar T; Shkedi A; Nadel CM; Gestwicki JE J Biol Chem; 2021 Nov; 297(5):101282. PubMed ID: 34624315 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Protein folding and unfolding by Escherichia coli chaperones and chaperonins. Gottesman ME; Hendrickson WA Curr Opin Microbiol; 2000 Apr; 3(2):197-202. PubMed ID: 10745003 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Molecular Insight into the Extracellular Chaperone Serum Albumin in Modifying the Folding Free Energy Landscape of Client Proteins. Jin Y; Yu G; Yuwen T; Gao D; Wang G; Zhou Y; Jiang B; Zhang X; Li C; He L; Liu M J Phys Chem Lett; 2022 Mar; 13(12):2711-2717. PubMed ID: 35311276 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. CHIP: a co-chaperone for degradation by the proteasome. Edkins AL Subcell Biochem; 2015; 78():219-42. PubMed ID: 25487024 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Chaperones and chaperone-substrate complexes: Dynamic playgrounds for NMR spectroscopists. Burmann BM; Hiller S Prog Nucl Magn Reson Spectrosc; 2015 Apr; 86-87():41-64. PubMed ID: 25919198 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Protein solubility and folding enhancement by interaction with RNA. Choi SI; Han KS; Kim CW; Ryu KS; Kim BH; Kim KH; Kim SI; Kang TH; Shin HC; Lim KH; Kim HK; Hyun JM; Seong BL PLoS One; 2008 Jul; 3(7):e2677. PubMed ID: 18628952 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Common Patterns in Chaperone Interactions with a Native Client Protein. He L; Hiller S Angew Chem Int Ed Engl; 2018 May; 57(20):5921-5924. PubMed ID: 29498447 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Protein-Protein Interactions in the Molecular Chaperone Network. Freilich R; Arhar T; Abrams JL; Gestwicki JE Acc Chem Res; 2018 Apr; 51(4):940-949. PubMed ID: 29613769 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Conformational states bound by the molecular chaperones GroEL and secB: a hidden unfolding (annealing) activity. Zahn R; Perrett S; Fersht AR J Mol Biol; 1996 Aug; 261(1):43-61. PubMed ID: 8760501 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Frustrated Interfaces Facilitate Dynamic Interactions between Native Client Proteins and Holdase Chaperones. He L; Hiller S Chembiochem; 2019 Nov; 20(22):2803-2806. PubMed ID: 31063619 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Binding and folding: in search of intramolecular chaperone-like building block fragments. Ma B; Tsai CJ; Nussinov R Protein Eng; 2000 Sep; 13(9):617-27. PubMed ID: 11054456 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related] [Next] [New Search]