186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33136292)
21. Comparison between digital panoramic radiography and cone-beam computed tomography for the identification of the mandibular canal as part of presurgical dental implant assessment.
Angelopoulos C; Thomas SL; Hechler S; Parissis N; Hlavacek M
J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2008 Oct; 66(10):2130-5. PubMed ID: 18848113
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
22. Effective doses in panoramic images from conventional and CBCT equipment.
Batista WO; Navarro MV; Maia AF
Radiat Prot Dosimetry; 2012 Aug; 151(1):67-75. PubMed ID: 22171097
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
23. The influence of dental implants in periapical and panoramic radiographs and cone beam computed tomography images: a clinical study.
Felix RP; Shinkai RSA; Rockenbach MIB
Gen Dent; 2018; 66(2):e1-e6. PubMed ID: 29513241
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
24. Defining new paradigms for assessment of implant receptor sites. The use of CT/CBCT and interactive virtual treatment planning for congenitally missing lateral incisors.
Ganz SD
Compend Contin Educ Dent; 2008 Jun; 29(5):256-8, 260-2, 264-7; quiz 268, 278. PubMed ID: 18795643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
25. Automatic dental arch detection and panoramic image synthesis from CT images.
Sa-Ing V; Wangkaoom K; Thongvigitmanee SS
Annu Int Conf IEEE Eng Med Biol Soc; 2013; 2013():6099-102. PubMed ID: 24111131
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
26. Planning of dental implant size with digital panoramic radiographs, CBCT-generated panoramic images, and CBCT cross-sectional images.
Correa LR; Spin-Neto R; Stavropoulos A; Schropp L; da Silveira HE; Wenzel A
Clin Oral Implants Res; 2014 Jun; 25(6):690-5. PubMed ID: 23442085
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
27. Analysis of bite marks in foodstuffs by computer tomography (cone beam CT)--3D reconstruction.
Marques J; Musse J; Caetano C; Corte-Real F; Corte-Real AT
J Forensic Odontostomatol; 2013 Dec; 31(1):1-7. PubMed ID: 24776435
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
28. Dental radiology considerations in DVI incidents: A review.
Wood RE; Kogon SL
Forensic Sci Int; 2010 Sep; 201(1-3):27-32. PubMed ID: 20452155
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
29. Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Nasseh I; Al-Rawi W
Dent Clin North Am; 2018 Jul; 62(3):361-391. PubMed ID: 29903556
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
30. Applications of cone beam computed tomography in dental and oral medicine.
Kaeppler G
Int J Comput Dent; 2010; 13(3):203-19. PubMed ID: 20879460
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
31. Do CBCT scans alter surgical treatment plans? Comparison of preoperative surgical diagnosis using panoramic versus cone-beam CT images.
Wolff C; Mücke T; Wagenpfeil S; Kanatas A; Bissinger O; Deppe H
J Craniomaxillofac Surg; 2016 Oct; 44(10):1700-1705. PubMed ID: 27567358
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
32. Basic principles of cone beam computed tomography.
Abramovitch K; Rice DD
Dent Clin North Am; 2014 Jul; 58(3):463-84. PubMed ID: 24993919
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
33. Preoperative assessment of the mandibular canal in implant surgery: comparison of rotational panoramic radiography (OPG), computed tomography (CT) and cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) for preoperative assessment in implant surgery.
Pertl L; Gashi-Cenkoglu B; Reichmann J; Jakse N; Pertl C
Eur J Oral Implantol; 2013; 6(1):73-80. PubMed ID: 23513204
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
34. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: a useful tool for dental age estimation?
Maret D; Peters OA; Dedouit F; Telmon N; Sixou M
Med Hypotheses; 2011 May; 76(5):700-2. PubMed ID: 21345598
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
35. Optimization of X-ray Investigations in Dentistry Using Optical Coherence Tomography.
Erdelyi RA; Duma VF; Sinescu C; Dobre GM; Bradu A; Podoleanu A
Sensors (Basel); 2021 Jul; 21(13):. PubMed ID: 34283107
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
36. Evaluation of a personal identification method using the fusion function of CT images and dental radiographs.
Sakuma A; Makino Y; Saitoh H; Chiba F; Ishii N; Iwase H
Dentomaxillofac Radiol; 2015; 44(2):20140137. PubMed ID: 25270062
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
37. Influence of 2D vs 3D imaging and professional experience on dental implant treatment planning.
Fortes JH; de Oliveira-Santos C; Matsumoto W; da Motta RJG; Tirapelli C
Clin Oral Investig; 2019 Feb; 23(2):929-936. PubMed ID: 29907931
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
38. Cone-Beam Computed Tomography: A New Tool on the Horizon for Forensic Dentistry.
Issrani R; Prabhu N; Sghaireen MG; Ganji KK; Alqahtani AMA; ALJamaan TS; Alanazi AM; Alanazi SH; Alam MK; Munisekhar MS
Int J Environ Res Public Health; 2022 Apr; 19(9):. PubMed ID: 35564747
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
39. Periapical and endodontic status scale based on periapical bone lesions and endodontic treatment quality evaluation using cone-beam computed tomography.
Venskutonis T; Plotino G; Tocci L; Gambarini G; Maminskas J; Juodzbalys G
J Endod; 2015 Feb; 41(2):190-6. PubMed ID: 25498834
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
40. Radiologic techniques using CBCT and 3-D treatment planning for implant placement.
Peck JN; Conte GJ
J Calif Dent Assoc; 2008 Apr; 36(4):287-90, 292-4, 296-7. PubMed ID: 18481625
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Previous] [Next] [New Search]
