These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

194 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33136637)

  • 1. Classification of Hearing Aids Into Feature Profiles Using Hierarchical Latent Class Analysis Applied to a Large Dataset of Hearing Aids.
    Lansbergen S; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1619-1634. PubMed ID: 33136637
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Classification of Hearing Aids Into Feature Profiles Using Hierarchical Latent Class Analysis Applied to a Large Dataset of Hearing Aids.
    Lansbergen S; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2020 Apr; ():. PubMed ID: 32287084
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Exploring Factors That Contribute to the Success of Rehabilitation With Hearing Aids.
    Lansbergen SE; Versfeld N; Dreschler WA
    Ear Hear; 2023 Nov-Dec 01; 44(6):1514-1525. PubMed ID: 37792897
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Hearing aids in the real world: typical automatic behavior of expansion, directionality, and noise management.
    Banerjee S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jan; 22(1):34-48. PubMed ID: 21419068
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Telecoil-mode hearing aid compatibility performance requirements for wireless and cordless handsets: magnetic signal levels.
    Julstrom S; Kozma-Spytek L; Isabelle S
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Sep; 22(8):515-27. PubMed ID: 22031676
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Personal amplification for school-age children with auditory processing disorders.
    Kuk F; Jackson A; Keenan D; Lau CC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2008 Jun; 19(6):465-80. PubMed ID: 19253780
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. High-frequency audibility: the effects of audiometric configuration, stimulus type, and device.
    Kimlinger C; McCreery R; Lewis D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Feb; 26(2):128-37. PubMed ID: 25690773
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Tracking of Noise Tolerance to Measure Hearing Aid Benefit.
    Kuk F; Seper E; Lau CC; Korhonen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2017 Sep; 28(8):698-707. PubMed ID: 28906241
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Effects of Directional Microphone and Noise Reduction on Subcortical and Cortical Auditory-Evoked Potentials in Older Listeners With Hearing Loss.
    Slugocki C; Kuk F; Korhonen P
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(5):1282-1293. PubMed ID: 32058351
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Differences in Word and Phoneme Recognition in Quiet, Sentence Recognition in Noise, and Subjective Outcomes between Manufacturer First-Fit and Hearing Aids Programmed to NAL-NL2 Using Real-Ear Measures.
    Valente M; Oeding K; Brockmeyer A; Smith S; Kallogjeri D
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2018 Sep; 29(8):706-721. PubMed ID: 30222541
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Noise reduction results of an adaptive filtering technique for dual-microphone behind-the-ear hearing aids.
    Maj JB; Wouters J; Moonen M
    Ear Hear; 2004 Jun; 25(3):215-29. PubMed ID: 15179113
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. The Effects of Extended Input Dynamic Range on Laboratory and Field-Trial Evaluations in Adult Hearing Aid Users.
    Plyler PN; Easterday M; Behrens T
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2019; 30(7):634-648. PubMed ID: 30403956
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Experiments with classroom FM amplification.
    Boothroyd A; Iglehart F
    Ear Hear; 1998 Jun; 19(3):202-17. PubMed ID: 9657595
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Accuracy of predicted ear canal speech levels using the VIOLA input/output-based fitting strategy.
    Cox RM; Flamme GA
    Ear Hear; 1998 Apr; 19(2):139-48. PubMed ID: 9562536
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Sentence recognition in noise and perceived benefit of noise reduction on the receiver and transmitter sides of a BICROS hearing aid.
    Oeding K; Valente M
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2013; 24(10):980-91. PubMed ID: 24384083
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Effects of venting on wind noise levels measured at the eardrum.
    Chung K
    Ear Hear; 2013; 34(4):470-81. PubMed ID: 23403807
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Transitioning hearing aid users with severe and profound loss to a new gain/frequency response: benefit, perception, and acceptance.
    Convery E; Keidser G
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Mar; 22(3):168-80. PubMed ID: 21545769
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Predictability of speech-in-noise performance from real ear measures of directional hearing AIDS.
    Dhar S; Humes LE; Calandruccio L; Barlow NN; Hipskind N
    Ear Hear; 2004 Apr; 25(2):147-58. PubMed ID: 15064660
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. How Individuals Shape Their Acoustic Environment: Implications for Hearing Aid Comparison in Ecological Momentary Assessment.
    Borschke I; Jürgens T; Schinkel-Bielefeld N
    Ear Hear; 2024 Jul-Aug 01; 45(4):985-998. PubMed ID: 38514463
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Effect of maximum power output and noise reduction on speech recognition in noise.
    Kuk F; Peeters H; Lau C; Korhonen P
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 May; 22(5):265-73. PubMed ID: 21756842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.