186 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33136643)
1. Dynamically Masked Audiograms With Machine Learning Audiometry.
Heisey KL; Walker AM; Xie K; Abrams JM; Barbour DL
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1692-1702. PubMed ID: 33136643
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Online Machine Learning Audiometry.
Barbour DL; Howard RT; Song XD; Metzger N; Sukesan KA; DiLorenzo JC; Snyder BRD; Chen JY; Degen EA; Buchbinder JM; Heisey KL
Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):918-926. PubMed ID: 30358656
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Fast, Continuous Audiogram Estimation Using Machine Learning.
Song XD; Wallace BM; Gardner JR; Ledbetter NM; Weinberger KQ; Barbour DL
Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e326-35. PubMed ID: 26258575
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Masking and partial masking in listeners with a high-frequency hearing loss.
Smits JT; Duifhuis H
Audiology; 1982; 21(4):310-24. PubMed ID: 7103838
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.
Leong UC; Schwarz DM; Henry KS; Carney LH
Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):1009-1019. PubMed ID: 31985535
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Comodulation masking release for elderly listeners with relatively normal audiograms.
Peters RW; Hall JW
J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2674-82. PubMed ID: 7983273
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. The significance of masking for the poor hearing ear in pure tone audiometry.
Lin J; Duan X; Wen Y; Zhang J; Zou Y
Acta Otolaryngol; 2023 Nov; 143(sup1):S34-S38. PubMed ID: 38108144
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Binaural hearing, atresia, and the masking dilemma.
Lenhardt ML; Goldstein BA; Shulman A
Int Tinnitus J; 2006; 12(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 17260874
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Automated Audiometry in Quiet and Simulated Exam Room Noise for Listeners with Normal Hearing and Impaired Hearing.
Bean BN; Roberts RA; Picou EM; Angley GP; Edwards AJ
J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 34034339
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Measuring Temporal Resolution (Release of Masking) with a Hughson-Westlake Up-Down Instead of a Békèsy-Tracking Procedure.
Rhebergen KS; van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):563-71. PubMed ID: 26134723
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.
Wilson RH; McArdle R; Betancourt MB; Herring K; Lipton T; Chisolm TH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 20166311
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Some observations on the nature of the audiometric 4000 hz notch: data from 3430 veterans.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jan; 22(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21419067
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Tone-on-tone masking in subjects with normal hearing and with sensorineural hearing loss.
Chung DY
J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Dec; 24(4):506-13. PubMed ID: 7329047
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
Wilson RH
J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Comparison of growth of masking functions and speech discrimination abilities in younger and older adults.
Cheesman MF; Hepburn D; Armitage JC; Marshall K
Audiology; 1995; 34(6):321-33. PubMed ID: 8833312
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. Explainable machine learning reveals the relationship between hearing thresholds and speech-in-noise recognition in listeners with normal audiograms.
Balan JR; Rodrigo H; Saxena U; Mishra SK
J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Oct; 154(4):2278-2288. PubMed ID: 37823779
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
