These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

190 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33136643)

  • 1. Dynamically Masked Audiograms With Machine Learning Audiometry.
    Heisey KL; Walker AM; Xie K; Abrams JM; Barbour DL
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(6):1692-1702. PubMed ID: 33136643
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. Online Machine Learning Audiometry.
    Barbour DL; Howard RT; Song XD; Metzger N; Sukesan KA; DiLorenzo JC; Snyder BRD; Chen JY; Degen EA; Buchbinder JM; Heisey KL
    Ear Hear; 2019; 40(4):918-926. PubMed ID: 30358656
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Fast, Continuous Audiogram Estimation Using Machine Learning.
    Song XD; Wallace BM; Gardner JR; Ledbetter NM; Weinberger KQ; Barbour DL
    Ear Hear; 2015; 36(6):e326-35. PubMed ID: 26258575
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. Masking and partial masking in listeners with a high-frequency hearing loss.
    Smits JT; Duifhuis H
    Audiology; 1982; 21(4):310-24. PubMed ID: 7103838
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Sensorineural Hearing Loss Diminishes Use of Temporal Envelope Cues: Evidence From Roving-Level Tone-in-Noise Detection.
    Leong UC; Schwarz DM; Henry KS; Carney LH
    Ear Hear; 2020; 41(4):1009-1019. PubMed ID: 31985535
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Pure-Tone Audiometry With Forward Pressure Level Calibration Leads to Clinically-Relevant Improvements in Test-Retest Reliability.
    Lapsley Miller JA; Reed CM; Robinson SR; Perez ZD
    Ear Hear; 2018; 39(5):946-957. PubMed ID: 29470259
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Estimates of basilar-membrane nonlinearity effects on masking of tones and speech.
    Dubno JR; Horwitz AR; Ahlstrom JB
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):2-17. PubMed ID: 17204895
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. The relationship between high-frequency pure-tone hearing loss, hearing in noise test (HINT) thresholds, and the articulation index.
    Vermiglio AJ; Soli SD; Freed DJ; Fisher LM
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2012; 23(10):779-88. PubMed ID: 23169195
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Comodulation masking release for elderly listeners with relatively normal audiograms.
    Peters RW; Hall JW
    J Acoust Soc Am; 1994 Nov; 96(5 Pt 1):2674-82. PubMed ID: 7983273
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. The significance of masking for the poor hearing ear in pure tone audiometry.
    Lin J; Duan X; Wen Y; Zhang J; Zou Y
    Acta Otolaryngol; 2023 Nov; 143(sup1):S34-S38. PubMed ID: 38108144
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Binaural hearing, atresia, and the masking dilemma.
    Lenhardt ML; Goldstein BA; Shulman A
    Int Tinnitus J; 2006; 12(2):96-100. PubMed ID: 17260874
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Automated Audiometry in Quiet and Simulated Exam Room Noise for Listeners with Normal Hearing and Impaired Hearing.
    Bean BN; Roberts RA; Picou EM; Angley GP; Edwards AJ
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Jan; 33(1):6-13. PubMed ID: 34034339
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Measuring Temporal Resolution (Release of Masking) with a Hughson-Westlake Up-Down Instead of a Békèsy-Tracking Procedure.
    Rhebergen KS; van Esch TE; Dreschler WA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015 Jun; 26(6):563-71. PubMed ID: 26134723
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Word-recognition performance in interrupted noise by young listeners with normal hearing and older listeners with hearing loss.
    Wilson RH; McArdle R; Betancourt MB; Herring K; Lipton T; Chisolm TH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2010 Feb; 21(2):90-109. PubMed ID: 20166311
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Accuracy of Mobile-Based Audiometry in the Evaluation of Hearing Loss in Quiet and Noisy Environments.
    Saliba J; Al-Reefi M; Carriere JS; Verma N; Provencal C; Rappaport JM
    Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg; 2017 Apr; 156(4):706-711. PubMed ID: 28025906
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Some observations on the nature of the audiometric 4000 hz notch: data from 3430 veterans.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Jan; 22(1):23-33. PubMed ID: 21419067
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Tone-on-tone masking in subjects with normal hearing and with sensorineural hearing loss.
    Chung DY
    J Speech Hear Res; 1981 Dec; 24(4):506-13. PubMed ID: 7329047
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Clinical experience with the words-in-noise test on 3430 veterans: comparisons with pure-tone thresholds and word recognition in quiet.
    Wilson RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011; 22(7):405-23. PubMed ID: 21993048
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Comparison of growth of masking functions and speech discrimination abilities in younger and older adults.
    Cheesman MF; Hepburn D; Armitage JC; Marshall K
    Audiology; 1995; 34(6):321-33. PubMed ID: 8833312
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. Explainable machine learning reveals the relationship between hearing thresholds and speech-in-noise recognition in listeners with normal audiograms.
    Balan JR; Rodrigo H; Saxena U; Mishra SK
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2023 Oct; 154(4):2278-2288. PubMed ID: 37823779
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 10.