These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

120 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33136651)

  • 21. AMTAS: automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: validation studies.
    Margolis RH; Glasberg BR; Creeke S; Moore BC
    Int J Audiol; 2010 Mar; 49(3):185-94. PubMed ID: 20109081
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 22. Establishing transducers-dependent sensorineural acuity level normative data among young Malaysian adults.
    Zakaria MN; Ensin EG; Awang MA; Salim R; Nik Othman NA; Rashid MFN
    Med J Malaysia; 2023 Dec; 78(7):901-906. PubMed ID: 38159926
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 23. Air-radiated sound from bone vibration transducers and its implications for bone conduction audiometry.
    Shipton MS; John AJ; Robinson DW
    Br J Audiol; 1980 Aug; 14(3):86-99. PubMed ID: 7417729
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 24. Coupler output level differences resulting from repeated transducer placement.
    Frank T; Chaffinch JO; Svitko CS
    Ear Hear; 1986 Aug; 7(4):273-5. PubMed ID: 3743920
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 25. Acoustic method for calibration of audiometric bone vibrators. II. Harmonic distortion.
    Ginter SM; Margolis RH
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2013 Jul; 134(1):EL33-7. PubMed ID: 23862903
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 26. Bone Conduction Thresholds without Bone Vibrator Application Force.
    Geal-Dor M; Chordekar S; Adelman C; Sohmer H
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2015; 26(7):645-51. PubMed ID: 26218053
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 27. Effects of contralateral masking on high-frequency bone-conduction thresholds.
    McDermott JC; Fausti SA; Henry JA; Frey RH
    Audiology; 1990; 29(6):297-303. PubMed ID: 2275644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 28. Effect of bone-conduction harmonic distortions on hearing thresholds.
    Eichenauer A; Dillon H; Clinch B; Loi T
    J Acoust Soc Am; 2014 Aug; 136(2):EL96-102. PubMed ID: 25096153
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 29. Masked high-frequency bone-conduction audiometry: test reliability.
    McDermott JC; Fausti SA; Henry JA; Frey RH
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1991 Apr; 2(2):99-104. PubMed ID: 1768879
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 30. Equivalent hearing threshold levels for the RadioEar IP30 insert earphone and short-term stimuli: comparison of peak-equivalent and RMS-based measures.
    Fedtke T; Bug MU
    Int J Audiol; 2020 May; 59(5):398-402. PubMed ID: 31657255
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 31. AMBAND Bone-Conduction Headband.
    Margolis RH; Margolis JC
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2022 Apr; 33(4):214-219. PubMed ID: 35042247
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 32. Behavioral bone-conduction thresholds for infants with normal hearing.
    Hulecki LR; Small SA
    J Am Acad Audiol; 2011 Feb; 22(2):81-92. PubMed ID: 21463563
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 33. A brief communication on bone conduction artefacts.
    Bell I; Goodsell S; Thornton AR
    Br J Audiol; 1980 Aug; 14(3):73-5. PubMed ID: 7417727
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 34. Threshold of hearing by bone conduction. A contribution to international standardization.
    Richter U; Brinkmann K
    Scand Audiol; 1981; 10(4):235-7. PubMed ID: 7323673
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 35. Acoustic radiation produced by B-71, B-72, and KH 70 bone vibrators.
    Frank T; Crandell CC
    Ear Hear; 1986 Oct; 7(5):344-7. PubMed ID: 3770330
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 36. High-frequency thresholds: circumaural earphone versus insert earphone.
    Valente M; Valente M; Goebel J
    J Am Acad Audiol; 1992 Nov; 3(6):410-8. PubMed ID: 1486204
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 37. The Beltone 5b artificial mastoid: theoretical characteristics and performance measurements.
    Frank T; Richards WD
    Ear Hear; 1980; 1(6):310-8. PubMed ID: 7439564
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 38. Effects of bone oscillator coupling method, placement location, and occlusion on bone-conduction auditory steady-state responses in infants.
    Small SA; Hatton JL; Stapells DR
    Ear Hear; 2007 Feb; 28(1):83-98. PubMed ID: 17204901
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 39. High-frequency air conduction audiometry. Testing of a new low impedance circumaural transducer system in normal young persons.
    Hansen TS; Brask T; Larsen S
    Scand Audiol; 1993; 22(1):37-42. PubMed ID: 8465139
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 40. Relative effective frequency response of bone versus air conduction stimulation examined via masking.
    Durrant JD; Hyre R
    Audiology; 1993; 32(3):175-84. PubMed ID: 8489478
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Previous]   [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.