214 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33136785)
1. Midface Morphology and Growth in Syndromic Craniosynostosis Patients Following Frontofacial Monobloc Distraction.
Tonello C; Cevidanes LHS; Ruellas ACO; Alonso N
J Craniofac Surg; 2021 Jan-Feb 01; 32(1):87-91. PubMed ID: 33136785
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
2. Three-dimensional image analysis of facial skeletal changes after monobloc and bipartition distraction.
Ponniah AJT; Witherow H; Richards R; Evans R; Hayward R; Dunaway D
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2008 Jul; 122(1):225-231. PubMed ID: 18594409
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
3. Comparison of Internal and External Distraction in Frontofacial Monobloc Advancement: A Three-Dimensional Quantification.
Rickart AJ; van de Lande LS; O' Sullivan E; Bloch K; Arnaud E; Schievano S; Jeelani NUO; Paternoster G; Khonsari R; Dunaway DJ
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2023 Sep; 152(3):612-622. PubMed ID: 36847681
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
4. Craniosynostosis: Monobloc Distraction with Internal Device and Its Variant for Infants with Severe Syndromic Craniosynostosis.
Paternoster G; Haber SE; Khonsari RH; James S; Arnaud E
Clin Plast Surg; 2021 Jul; 48(3):497-506. PubMed ID: 34051901
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. Fronto-facial monobloc distraction in syndromic craniosynostosis. Three-dimensional evaluation of treatment outcome and facial growth.
Ko EW; Chen PK; Tai IC; Huang CS
Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2012 Jan; 41(1):20-7. PubMed ID: 22094394
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. Reossification of cranium and zygomatic arch after monobloc frontofacial distraction advancement for syndromic craniosynostosis.
Oyama A; Arnaud E; Marchac D; Renier D
J Craniofac Surg; 2009 Sep; 20 Suppl 2():1905-9. PubMed ID: 19816373
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. Complications in 54 frontofacial distraction procedures in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis.
Goldstein JA; Paliga JT; Taylor JA; Bartlett SP
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Jan; 26(1):124-8. PubMed ID: 25569391
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Long-Term Follow-Up on Bone Stability and Complication Rate after Monobloc Advancement in Syndromic Craniosynostosis.
Raposo-Amaral CE; Denadai R; Zanco GL; Ghizoni E; Raposo-Amaral CA
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2020 Apr; 145(4):1025-1034. PubMed ID: 32221227
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. Monobloc Frontofacial or Le Fort III Distraction Osteogenesis in Syndromic Craniosynostosis: Three-Dimensional Evaluation of Treatment Outcome and the Need for Central Distraction.
Hu CH; Wu CT; Ko EW; Chen PK
J Craniofac Surg; 2017 Jul; 28(5):1344-1349. PubMed ID: 28538077
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
10. Frontofacial Monobloc Advancement With Internal Distraction: Surgical Technique and Osteotomy Guide.
Ferreira Junior TA; Fontoura RR; Marques do Nascimento L; Alcântara MT; Capuchinho-Júnior GA; Alonso N; Matushita H; Costa BS; Faraj de Lima FB
Oper Neurosurg (Hagerstown); 2022 Jul; 23(1):e33-e41. PubMed ID: 35383710
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Frontofacial monobloc advancement using gradual bone distraction method.
Kamoshima Y; Sawamura Y; Yoshino M; Kawashima K
J Pediatr Surg; 2008 Oct; 43(10):1944-8. PubMed ID: 18926239
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. Soft-tissue volumetric changes following monobloc distraction procedure: analysis using digital three-dimensional photogrammetry system (3dMD).
Chan FC; Kawamoto HK; Federico C; Bradley JP
J Craniofac Surg; 2013 Mar; 24(2):416-20. PubMed ID: 23524705
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Monobloc Differential Distraction Osteogenesis.
Polley JW; Figueroa AA; Girotto JA; Dietze-Fiedler ML
J Craniofac Surg; 2022 Jan-Feb 01; 33(1):270-275. PubMed ID: 34967523
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. LeFort III Versus Monobloc Frontofacial Advancement: A Comparative Analysis of Soft Tissue Changes.
Wagner CS; Cho DY; Villavisanis DF; Kumar S; Salinero LK; Barrero CE; Swanson JW; Bartlett SP; Taylor JA
J Craniofac Surg; 2024 Jan-Feb 01; 35(1):194-198. PubMed ID: 37934807
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Midface distraction following Le Fort III and monobloc osteotomies: problems and solutions.
Gosain AK; Santoro TD; Havlik RJ; Cohen SR; Holmes RE
Plast Reconstr Surg; 2002 May; 109(6):1797-808. PubMed ID: 11994576
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
16. Evaluation of maxillary permanent molars in patients with syndromic craniosynostosis after monobloc osteotomy and midface advancement with rigid external distraction (RED).
Sant'Anna EF; de A Cury-Saramago A; Figueroa AA; Polley JW
Cleft Palate Craniofac J; 2010 Mar; 47(2):109-15. PubMed ID: 20210632
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Respiratory outcome of midface advancement with distraction: a comparison between Le Fort III and frontofacial monobloc.
Mathijssen I; Arnaud E; Marchac D; Mireau E; Morisseau-Durand MP; Guérin P; Renier D
J Craniofac Surg; 2006 Jul; 17(4):642-4. PubMed ID: 16877907
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
18. Subcranial Midface Advancement in Patients with Syndromic Craniosynostosis.
Massenburg BB; Susarla SM; Kapadia HP; Hopper RA
Oral Maxillofac Surg Clin North Am; 2022 Aug; 34(3):467-475. PubMed ID: 35787822
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
19. Family of Crouzon Syndrome Represents the Evolution of the Frontofacial Monobloc Advancement Technique: From Immediate Movement to Monobloc Distraction to Monobloc Bipartition Distraction.
Raposo-Amaral CE; Denadai R; Ghizoni E; Buzzo CL; Raposo-Amaral CA
J Craniofac Surg; 2015 Sep; 26(6):1940-3. PubMed ID: 26267562
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
20. [Frontofacial monobloc advancement using the Rigid External Distraction (RED-II) system].
Kamoshima Y; Sawamura Y; Iwasaki M; Iwasaki Y; Kawashima K
No Shinkei Geka; 2007 Aug; 35(8):781-6. PubMed ID: 17695776
[TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
[Next] [New Search]
