These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

127 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 33136913)

  • 1. Comparison of Glenoid Fossa Morphology Between Different Sagittal Skeletal Pattern Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
    Khademi B; Karandish M; Paknahad M; Farmani S
    J Craniofac Surg; 2020; 31(8):e789-e792. PubMed ID: 33136913
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Cone-beam CT evaluation of temporomandibular joint in skeletal class Ⅱ female adolescents with different vertical patterns].
    Zhou J; Liu Y
    Beijing Da Xue Xue Bao Yi Xue Ban; 2020 Dec; 53(1):109-119. PubMed ID: 33550344
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Improved Visualization and Assessment of Condylar Position in the Glenoid Fossa for Different Occlusions: A CBCT Study.
    Kaur A; Natt AS; Mehra SK; Maheshwari K; Singh G; Kaur A
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2016 Aug; 17(8):679-86. PubMed ID: 27659088
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. The Correlation Between Morphologic Characteristics of Condyle and Glenoid Fossa with Different Sagittal Patterns of Jaw Assessed by Cone-Beam Computed Tomography.
    Kariminasab N; Dalili Kajan Z; Hajian-Tilaki A
    Turk J Orthod; 2022 Dec; 35(4):268-275. PubMed ID: 36594548
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Spatial analysis of condyle position according to sagittal skeletal relationship, assessed by cone beam computed tomography.
    Arieta-Miranda JM; Silva-Valencia M; Flores-Mir C; Paredes-Sampen NA; Arriola-Guillen LE
    Prog Orthod; 2013 Oct; 14():36. PubMed ID: 24325842
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Assessment of thickness of roof of the glenoid fossa in dentate, edentulous, and partially edentulous subjects using cone beam computed tomography (CBCT) - a retrospective study.
    Chandran Kana Veettil A; Mariyappa Shantha A; Timmasandra Ashwathappa D; Sailaja Choudary A; Lingaiah U
    J Stomatol Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2022 Oct; 123(5):e279-e284. PubMed ID: 35545193
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. Dimensional and Positional Associations between the Mandibular Condyle and Glenoid Fossa: A Three-dimensional Cone-beam Computed Tomography-based Study.
    Almashraqi AA
    J Contemp Dent Pract; 2020 Oct; 21(10):1075-1083. PubMed ID: 33686026
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Temporomandibular Joint Osseous Morphology of Class I and Class II Malocclusions in the Normal Skeletal Pattern: A Cone-Beam Computed Tomography Study.
    Fan XC; Ma LS; Chen L; Singh D; Rausch-Fan X; Huang XF
    Diagnostics (Basel); 2021 Mar; 11(3):. PubMed ID: 33803644
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Three-dimensional bone remodelling of glenoid fossa in patients with skeletal Class III malocclusion after bimaxillary orthognathic surgery.
    Shi Y; Luo S; Wang H; Yao Q; Shi Y; Cheng J
    Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg; 2024 Feb; 53(2):133-140. PubMed ID: 37442687
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Comprehensive positional and morphological assessments of the temporomandibular joint in adolescents with skeletal Class III malocclusion: a retrospective CBCT study.
    Chen Y; Li L; Li Y; Luo N; Dai H; Zhou J
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Feb; 23(1):78. PubMed ID: 36750919
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. Evaluation of structural skeletal asymmetry of the glenoid fossa in adult patients with unilateral posterior crossbite using surface-to-surface matching on CBCT images.
    Muraglie S; Leonardi R; Aboulazm K; Stumpo C; Loreto C; Grippaudo C
    Angle Orthod; 2020 May; 90(3):376-382. PubMed ID: 33378428
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Comprehensive three-dimensional positional and morphological assessment of the temporomandibular joint in skeletal Class II patients with mandibular retrognathism in different vertical skeletal patterns.
    Al-Hadad SA; ALyafrusee ES; Abdulqader AA; Al-Gumaei WS; Al-Mohana RAAM; Ren L
    BMC Oral Health; 2022 Apr; 22(1):149. PubMed ID: 35484618
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. The crown-root morphology of central incisors in different skeletal malocclusions assessed with cone-beam computed tomography.
    Wang XM; Ma LZ; Wang J; Xue H
    Prog Orthod; 2019 May; 20(1):20. PubMed ID: 31111270
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. [Evaluations of the morphology and position of condyle and fossa of adolescent temporomandibular joint with Class Ⅱsubdivision malocclusions].
    Ding YF; Song LJ
    Shanghai Kou Qiang Yi Xue; 2020 Dec; 29(6):656-660. PubMed ID: 33778837
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. Differences in mandibular condyle and glenoid fossa morphology in relation to vertical and sagittal skeletal patterns: A cone-beam computed tomography study.
    Noh KJ; Baik HS; Han SS; Jang W; Choi YJ
    Korean J Orthod; 2021 Mar; 51(2):126-134. PubMed ID: 33678628
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. Evaluation of condyle-fossa relationships in adolescents with various skeletal patterns using cone-beam computed tomography.
    Chae JM; Park JH; Tai K; Mizutani K; Uzuka S; Miyashita W; Seo HY
    Angle Orthod; 2020 Mar; 90(2):224-232. PubMed ID: 31638857
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. Comparative cone-beam computed tomography evaluation of temporomandibular joint position and morphology in female patients with skeletal class II malocclusion.
    Lin M; Xu Y; Wu H; Zhang H; Wang S; Qi K
    J Int Med Res; 2020 Feb; 48(2):300060519892388. PubMed ID: 31878826
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Evaluation of condyle position in patients with Angle Class I, II, and III malocclusion using cone-beam computed tomography panoramic reconstructions.
    Akbulut A; Kılınç DD
    Oral Radiol; 2019 Jan; 35(1):43-50. PubMed ID: 30484184
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Tridimensional assessment of the mandibular angle in patients with different skeletal patterns by cone-beam computed tomography scans: a retrospective study.
    Miranda-Viana M; Moreira GM; de Souza LM; Nejaim Y; Haiter-Neto F; Freitas DQ
    BMC Oral Health; 2023 Jun; 23(1):361. PubMed ID: 37271800
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Comparative study of the condylar positions in different sagittal skeletal facial types with cone-beam computed tomography].
    Du L; Zhao Q; Tian M; Heng C; Cui X; Li Q
    Hua Xi Kou Qiang Yi Xue Za Zhi; 2014 Aug; 32(4):382-5. PubMed ID: 25241542
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 7.