These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.
4. The probable and the possible at 12 months: intuitive reasoning about the uncertain future. Cesana-Arlotti N; Téglás E; Bonatti LL Adv Child Dev Behav; 2012; 43():1-25. PubMed ID: 23205406 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
5. The Influence of Effortful Thought and Cognitive Proficiencies on the Conjunction Fallacy: Implications for Dual-Process Theories of Reasoning and Judgment. Scherer LD; Yates JF; Baker SG; Valentine KD Pers Soc Psychol Bull; 2017 Jun; 43(6):874-887. PubMed ID: 28903676 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
6. On the determinants of the conjunction fallacy: probability versus inductive confirmation. Tentori K; Crupi V; Russo S J Exp Psychol Gen; 2013 Feb; 142(1):235-255. PubMed ID: 22823498 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
7. The bright homunculus in our head: Individual differences in intuitive sensitivity to logical validity. Ghasemi O; Handley S; Howarth S Q J Exp Psychol (Hove); 2022 Mar; 75(3):508-535. PubMed ID: 34427470 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
8. Typicality and reasoning fallacies. Shafir EB; Smith EE; Osherson DN Mem Cognit; 1990 May; 18(3):229-39. PubMed ID: 2355854 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
9. The conjunction fallacy? Wolford G; Taylor HA; Beck JR Mem Cognit; 1990 Jan; 18(1):47-53. PubMed ID: 2314227 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
11. Source reliability and the conjunction fallacy. Jarvstad A; Hahn U Cogn Sci; 2011; 35(4):682-711. PubMed ID: 21564268 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
12. The conjunction fallacy and the many meanings of and. Hertwig R; Benz B; Krauss S Cognition; 2008 Sep; 108(3):740-53. PubMed ID: 18723167 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
13. Précis of bayesian rationality: The probabilistic approach to human reasoning. Oaksford M; Chater N Behav Brain Sci; 2009 Feb; 32(1):69-84; discussion 85-120. PubMed ID: 19210833 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
14. When it all falls down: the relationship between intuitive physics and spatial cognition. Mitko A; Fischer J Cogn Res Princ Implic; 2020 May; 5(1):24. PubMed ID: 32430546 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
15. Propositional reasoning: the differential contribution of "rules" to the difficulty of complex reasoning problems. Rijmen F; De Boeck P Mem Cognit; 2001 Jan; 29(1):165-75. PubMed ID: 11277459 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]
17. Can conditionals explain explanations? A modus ponens model of B because A. Sebben S; Ullrich J Cognition; 2021 Oct; 215():104812. PubMed ID: 34246085 [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]