These tools will no longer be maintained as of December 31, 2024. Archived website can be found here. PubMed4Hh GitHub repository can be found here. Contact NLM Customer Service if you have questions.


BIOMARKERS

Molecular Biopsy of Human Tumors

- a resource for Precision Medicine *

117 related articles for article (PubMed ID: 3313817)

  • 1. Comparison of lingual sulcus depth obtained with three impression materials.
    Jooste CH; Bradshaw D; Jooste N
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1987 May; 42(5):241-4. PubMed ID: 3313817
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 2. [Mixed impressions (alginate and zinc oxide eugenol) in posterior bilaterally edentulous patients].
    Braun AA; de Vargas HM; Weigert F; Mazzaquatro W
    Rev Gaucha Odontol; 1975; 23(4):283-90. PubMed ID: 802326
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 3. Impression technique for RPDs. A comparison between two methods.
    Gunne J; Högström J; Nilson H
    Swed Dent J; 1990; 14(5):225-31. PubMed ID: 2264016
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 4. A comparative study of oral vestibular sulcus reproduction.
    Glantz PO; Owall B
    Odontol Revy; 1972; 23(3):355-62. PubMed ID: 4563097
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 5. Reproducibility of the border outline of working impressions of the edentulous mandible obtained by the Slack-Herbst method.
    Krysinski Z; Prylinski M
    J Nihon Univ Sch Dent; 1986 Jun; 28(2):139-45. PubMed ID: 3531429
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 6. Immediate denture impression technique using zinc-oxide and eugenol and rubber base impression material.
    Chaney SA
    Dent J; 1977 Mar; 43(3):130-1. PubMed ID: 323026
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 7. A double alginate mandibular impression technique.
    Thomas CJ
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1979 Nov; 34(11):781-2. PubMed ID: 399394
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 8. Pressure generated on a simulated oral analog by impression materials in custom trays of different designs.
    Masri R; Driscoll CF; Burkhardt J; Von Fraunhofer A; Romberg E
    J Prosthodont; 2002 Sep; 11(3):155-60. PubMed ID: 12237795
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 9. Impression materials for recording the denture bearing mucosa.
    Koran A
    Dent Clin North Am; 1980 Jan; 24(1):97-111. PubMed ID: 6987107
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 10. Extension of zinc oxide-eugenol paste impressions.
    Owall B
    Sven Tandlak Tidskr; 1971 Oct; 64(10):673-9. PubMed ID: 4950176
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 11. The reproducibility of an edentulous mandibular impression in the lingual flange area.
    Jooste CH; Reyneke HS; Hamman CA
    J Dent Assoc S Afr; 1984 Jun; 39(6):389-2. PubMed ID: 6388035
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 12. Management of the flabby ridge: using contemporary materials to solve an old problem.
    Lynch CD; Allen PF
    Br Dent J; 2006 Mar; 200(5):258-61. PubMed ID: 16528326
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 13. Impression materials for complete and partial denture prosthodontics.
    Christensen GJ
    Dent Clin North Am; 1984 Apr; 28(2):223-37. PubMed ID: 6373404
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 14. Fabrication of a custom-made impression tray for making preliminary impressions of edentulous mandibles.
    Sofou AM; Diakoyianni-Mordohai I; Pissiotis AL; Emmanuel I
    Quintessence Int; 1998 Aug; 29(8):513-6. PubMed ID: 9807132
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 15. [Dental impression materials and complete denture prosthesis].
    Ogolnik R
    Rev Odontostomatol (Paris); 1973; 20(3):223-6. PubMed ID: 4533353
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 16. [Dimensional accuracy of partially edentulous arch in relation to impression material].
    Biffar R; Pfaller I
    Quintessenz; 1990 Jun; 41(6):1047-55. PubMed ID: 2204087
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 17. [Shreinemakers's method in bite registration of toothless lower arch].
    Doual ; Hannebique ; Jonas
    Rev Stomatoodontol Nord Fr; 1972; 27(105):43-6. PubMed ID: 4565593
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 18. Modified fluid wax impression for a severely resorbed edentulous mandibular ridge.
    Tan KM; Singer MT; Masri R; Driscoll CF
    J Prosthet Dent; 2009 Apr; 101(4):279-82. PubMed ID: 19328281
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

  • 19. Selected prosthodontic adaptation process for the aged.
    Arnold PD; Klein RA; Klein J
    J N J Dent Assoc; 1975; 47(1):13-6. PubMed ID: 801016
    [No Abstract]   [Full Text] [Related]  

  • 20. [Microbiological findings on Vikopres paste after functional impressions of the upper jaw].
    Teodosijević M; Nanusević O; Joković B; Miljković Z; Draganjac M
    Vojnosanit Pregl; 1996; 53(4):297-300. PubMed ID: 9229945
    [TBL] [Abstract][Full Text] [Related]  

    [Next]    [New Search]
    of 6.